kulawrKutafin Law ReviewKutafin Law Review2713-05252713-0533MSAL10.17803/2313-5395.2021.1.15.068-084kulawr-117Research ArticleARTICLESBioethics and Biolaw as Bioeconomy RegulatorsMokhovA. A.

Alexander A. Mokhov - Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of Medical Law, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL).

Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya St., 9, Moscow, 125993.

aamokhov@msal.ruKutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)Russian Federation202130042021816884Copyright © Mokhov A.A., 20212021Mokhov A.A.Mokhov A.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/117

The paper deals with the ethical and legal principles (foundations) of economy that have been important and required to a various extent at different stages in history. Advances in science and technology, emergence of modern biotechnologies, including the genetic ones, as well as shifts to new technological paradigms, on the one hand, make the emerging economy drift towards bioeconomy, and, on the other hand, increase the need for legal and ethical regulators. In view of the above, bioethics and biolaw begin to play an increasingly active role at the new stage of human civilization development. In Russia, the phenomena of bioethics and biolaw are at the initial stage of their institutionalization, they become more and more appealing due to the intensification of public debates, as well as due to an increase in the number of conflicts caused by the attempts to implement and broadly apply the achievements of biology, medicine and other sciences about life in daily practice.

Economybioeconomyethicsbioethicslawbiolawtechnologiesconflictsthe concept of four “BIOs”regulationbiopoliticsSupported by the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Topic: Legal Regulation of Accelerated Development of Genetic Technologies: Research and Methodology Framework; No 730000Ф.99.1.БВ16АА02001).ReferencesAlekseev, S., (1966). The Mechanism of Legal Regulation in a Socialist State. Yuridicheskaya literatura, p. 187. (In Russ.).Alekseev, S., (1966). The Mechanism of Legal Regulation in a Socialist State. Yuridicheskaya literatura, p. 187. (In Russ.).Bakshtanovskii, V. and Sogomonov, I., (2007). Applied Ethics: Idea, Foundation, Way of Existence. Voprosy filosofii, 9, pp. 45-48. (In Russ.).Bakshtanovskii, V. and Sogomonov, I., (2007). Applied Ethics: Idea, Foundation, Way of Existence. Voprosy filosofii, 9, pp. 45-48. (In Russ.).Bbsrc.ukri.org. (2015). BBSRC, Biotech Britain. [online] Available at: https://bbsrc.ukri.org/documents/capital-economics-biotech-britain-july-2015/ [Accessed 10.12.2020].Bbsrc.ukri.org. (2015). BBSRC, Biotech Britain. [online] Available at: https://bbsrc.ukri.org/documents/capital-economics-biotech-britain-july-2015/ [Accessed 10.12.2020].BECOTEPS. The European Bioeconomy in 2030 — Delivering Sustainable Growth by addressing the Grand Societal Challenges. (n.d.). [ebook] Available at: http://www.plantetp.org/images/stories/stories/documents_pdf/brochure_web.pdf [Accessed 10.12.2020].BECOTEPS. The European Bioeconomy in 2030 — Delivering Sustainable Growth by addressing the Grand Societal Challenges. (n.d.). [ebook] Available at: http://www.plantetp.org/images/stories/stories/documents_pdf/brochure_web.pdf [Accessed 10.12.2020].Brunori, G., (2013). Biomass, Biovalue and Sustainability: Some Thoughts on the Definition of the Bioeconomy. EuroChoices, 12(1), pp. 48-52.Brunori, G., (2013). Biomass, Biovalue and Sustainability: Some Thoughts on the Definition of the Bioeconomy. EuroChoices, 12(1), pp. 48-52.Gutnik, O., (2017). The Institute of the Independence of the Court in Criminal Proceedings in the Russian Federation. Lex russica, 4, pp. 67-73. (In Russ.).Gutnik, O., (2017). The Institute of the Independence of the Court in Criminal Proceedings in the Russian Federation. Lex russica, 4, pp. 67-73. (In Russ.).Ivashkovsky, S., (2011). Economy and Ethics: the History of Difficult Relations. Ekonomicheskaya politika, 3, pp. 114-141. (In Russ.).Ivashkovsky, S., (2011). Economy and Ethics: the History of Difficult Relations. Ekonomicheskaya politika, 3, pp. 114-141. (In Russ.).Luk'yanov, A., (2008). Bioethics with Basics of Biolaw. Moscow: Nauchnyy mir. (In Russ.).Luk'yanov, A., (2008). Bioethics with Basics of Biolaw. Moscow: Nauchnyy mir. (In Russ.).Mateescu, I., Popescu, S., Paun, L., Roata, G., Bancila, A. and Oancea, A., (2011). Bioeconomy. What is bioeconomy? How will bioeconomy develop the next two decades. Studia Universitatis «Vasile Goldiş», Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii, 21, pp. 451-456. (In Eng.).Mateescu, I., Popescu, S., Paun, L., Roata, G., Bancila, A. and Oancea, A., (2011). Bioeconomy. What is bioeconomy? How will bioeconomy develop the next two decades. Studia Universitatis «Vasile Goldiş», Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii, 21, pp. 451-456. (In Eng.).Mokhov, A., (2020). The Concept of Four “Bios” in Law and Legislation. Aktualnye problemy rossiiskogo prava, 15(8), pp. 146-154. (In Russ.).Mokhov, A., (2020). The Concept of Four “Bios” in Law and Legislation. Aktualnye problemy rossiiskogo prava, 15(8), pp. 146-154. (In Russ.).Mokhov, A., (2020). The Council of the President of the Russian Federation on Ethics. Aktualnye problemy rossiiskogo prava, 15(12), pp. 23-31. (In Russ.).Mokhov, A., (2020). The Council of the President of the Russian Federation on Ethics. Aktualnye problemy rossiiskogo prava, 15(12), pp. 23-31. (In Russ.).Ponkin, I. and Ponkina, A., (2014). Bioethics as a science and as a lex biomedica. Pravo i obrazovanie, 7, pp. 80-93. (In Russ.).Ponkin, I. and Ponkina, A., (2014). Bioethics as a science and as a lex biomedica. Pravo i obrazovanie, 7, pp. 80-93. (In Russ.).Potter, V., (2002). Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Kiev: Vadim Karpenko. (In Russ.).Potter, V., (2002). Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Kiev: Vadim Karpenko. (In Russ.).Schwab, K., (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: Eksmo, p. 138. (In Russ.).Schwab, K., (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: Eksmo, p. 138. (In Russ.).Sedova, N., (2005). The Legal Status of Bioethics in Present-Day Russia. Medical Law, 1, pp. 11-15. (In Russ.).Sedova, N., (2005). The Legal Status of Bioethics in Present-Day Russia. Medical Law, 1, pp. 11-15. (In Russ.).Semina, T., (2021). Medical Ethics: Bioethics — the Path to the Future. Moscow: Kanon, ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», p. 240. (In Russ.).Semina, T., (2021). Medical Ethics: Bioethics — the Path to the Future. Moscow: Kanon, ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», p. 240. (In Russ.).Siluyanova, I., (2008). The Chosen Ones. The Vocation of a Medical Practitioner. Moscow: Forma Т, p. 256. (In Russ.).Siluyanova, I., (2008). The Chosen Ones. The Vocation of a Medical Practitioner. Moscow: Forma Т, p. 256. (In Russ.).Valiev, R., (2016). The Legal Nature and Classification Identity of the Norms of Law Enforcement Ethics. Russian Law Journal, 5, pp. 19-28. (In Russ.).Valiev, R., (2016). The Legal Nature and Classification Identity of the Norms of Law Enforcement Ethics. Russian Law Journal, 5, pp. 19-28. (In Russ.).Zakharova, M.V., (2020). The Rosie effect or the dialectics of the social and the biological in the evolution of the legal map of the world in the 21st century. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 4, pp. 50-56. (In Russ.).Zakharova, M.V., (2020). The Rosie effect or the dialectics of the social and the biological in the evolution of the legal map of the world in the 21st century. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 4, pp. 50-56. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.