kulawrKutafin Law ReviewKutafin Law Review2713-05252713-0533MSAL10.17803/2313-5395.2022.1.19.073-098kulawr-157Research ArticleRESEARCH ARTICLESRejecting the Medical Model of Disability in Belarusian Sports Law: A Long Way to Nowhere?https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5617-4961HaurylchankaYu.

Yuliya Haurylchanka, Holder of an Advanced Doctorate in Law, Full Professor, Department of Economic Law

8 Leningradskaya ulitsa, Minsk 220030

hauryyuliya@gmail.comBelarusian State UniversityBelarus202205042022917398Copyright © Haurylchanka Y., 20222022Haurylchanka Y.Haurylchanka Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/157

The article deals with the Belarusian legislation and international legal acts in order to answer the question whether the rejection of the medical model of disability is implemented in Belarusian sports law. The author studies the concept of a disabled person, models of disability and legal regulation of adaptive sports from the point of view of sports law and human rights. It is proved that despite the declaration of non-discrimination of persons with disabilities, the problems associated with the medical model of disability remain very relevant in Belarus. The Belarusian legislation uses the concept of formal equality, but it is supplemented by victimization of disability and objectification of persons with disabilities. The emphasis is shifted to the charity nature of medical care, which brings us back to the medical model. The article argues the importance of adopting a Draft Law on Adaptive Physical Culture and Adaptive Sports to eliminate the existing shortcomings of the legal regulation of sports for persons with disabilities. The author also emphasizes that equalization of opportunities in sports should be defined much wider than providing sports facilities, ensuring equal conditions and opportunities for the development of adaptive movement in relation to the conditions and opportunities for the development of non-disabled sports and non-disabled physical culture. Equalization of opportunities should include a freedom of adaptability as a key category and one of the basic principles of the adaptive movement.

disabled personperson with a disabilitymedical model of disabilitysocial mode of disabilityBelarussports lawadaptive lawReferencesArnardóttir, O.M., (2014). The Differences that Make a Difference: Recent Developments on the Discrimination Grounds and the Margin of Appreciation under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 14(4), pp. 647–670, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu025.Arnardóttir, O.M., (2014). The Differences that Make a Difference: Recent Developments on the Discrimination Grounds and the Margin of Appreciation under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 14(4), pp. 647–670, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu025.Arstein-Kerslake, A., (2017). Restoring Voice to People with Cognitive Disabilities: Realizing the Right to Equal Recognition before the Law. London: Cambridge University Press.Arstein-Kerslake, A., (2017). Restoring Voice to People with Cognitive Disabilities: Realizing the Right to Equal Recognition before the Law. London: Cambridge University Press.Arstein-Kerslake, A., Maker, Y., Flynn, E., Ward, O., Bell, R., and Degener, T., (2020). Introducing a Human Rights-based Disability Research Methodology. Human Rights Law Review, 20(3), pp. 412–432.Arstein-Kerslake, A., Maker, Y., Flynn, E., Ward, O., Bell, R., and Degener, T., (2020). Introducing a Human Rights-based Disability Research Methodology. Human Rights Law Review, 20(3), pp. 412–432.Blockmans, I.G., (2019). Encounters with the White Coat: Confessions of a Sexuality and Disability Researcher in a Wheelchair in Becoming. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(2), pp. 170–179.Blockmans, I.G., (2019). Encounters with the White Coat: Confessions of a Sexuality and Disability Researcher in a Wheelchair in Becoming. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(2), pp. 170–179.Burns, J.K., (2009). Mental health and inequity: A human rights approach to inequality, discrimination, and mental disability. Health and Human Rights, 11(2), pp. 19–31.Burns, J.K., (2009). Mental health and inequity: A human rights approach to inequality, discrimination, and mental disability. Health and Human Rights, 11(2), pp. 19–31.Campbell, F.K., (2009). Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Campbell, F.K., (2009). Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.De Vos, M., (2020). The European Court of Justice and the march towards substantive equality in European Union anti-discrimination law. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 20(1), pp. 62–87, https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229120927947.De Vos, M., (2020). The European Court of Justice and the march towards substantive equality in European Union anti-discrimination law. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 20(1), pp. 62–87, https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229120927947.Degener, T., (2017). A Human Rights Model of Disability. In: Blank, P., and Flynn, E., eds. Routledge Handbook on Disability Law and Human Rights. Abingdon: Routledge.Degener, T., (2017). A Human Rights Model of Disability. In: Blank, P., and Flynn, E., eds. Routledge Handbook on Disability Law and Human Rights. Abingdon: Routledge.Díaz, S.R. and Ferreira, M.A.V., (2010). From dis-ability to functional diversity: An exercise of dis-normalization. Revista Internacional de Sociologia, 68(2), pp. 289–309, doi: 10.3989/ris.2008.05.22.Díaz, S.R. and Ferreira, M.A.V., (2010). From dis-ability to functional diversity: An exercise of dis-normalization. Revista Internacional de Sociologia, 68(2), pp. 289–309, doi: 10.3989/ris.2008.05.22.Domínguez, A.I. and Luna, B.G., (2019). Disability in the Spanish press: From the paradigm of rehabilitation to the paradigm of personal autonomy. Communication and Society, 32(1), pp. 77–90, doi: 10.15581/003.32.1.77-90.Domínguez, A.I. and Luna, B.G., (2019). Disability in the Spanish press: From the paradigm of rehabilitation to the paradigm of personal autonomy. Communication and Society, 32(1), pp. 77–90, doi: 10.15581/003.32.1.77-90.Favalli, S. and Ferri, D., (2016). Tracing the Boundaries between Disability and Sickness in the European Union: Squaring the Circle? European Journal of Health Law, 23, pp. 5–35, doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341392.Favalli, S. and Ferri, D., (2016). Tracing the Boundaries between Disability and Sickness in the European Union: Squaring the Circle? European Journal of Health Law, 23, pp. 5–35, doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341392.Favalli, S., (2018). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights and in the Council of Europe Disability Strategy 2017-2023: “from Zero to Hero.” Human Rights Law Review, 18(3), pp. 517-538, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy026.Favalli, S., (2018). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights and in the Council of Europe Disability Strategy 2017-2023: “from Zero to Hero.” Human Rights Law Review, 18(3), pp. 517-538, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy026.Fredman, S., (2016). Emerging from the Shadows: Substantive Equality and Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 16(2), pp. 273–301.Fredman, S., (2016). Emerging from the Shadows: Substantive Equality and Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 16(2), pp. 273–301.Gabel, S. and Peters, S., (2004). Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability. Journal Disability & Society, 19(6), pp. 585–600, doi: 10.1080/0968759042000252515.Gabel, S. and Peters, S., (2004). Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability. Journal Disability & Society, 19(6), pp. 585–600, doi: 10.1080/0968759042000252515.Ganterer, J. and More, R., (2019). Different bodies: Normality and embodiments of disability and gender. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 70(1), pp. 160–173.Ganterer, J. and More, R., (2019). Different bodies: Normality and embodiments of disability and gender. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 70(1), pp. 160–173.Kanter, A.S., (2003). The Globalisation of Disability Rights Law. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 30, pp. 241–247.Kanter, A.S., (2003). The Globalisation of Disability Rights Law. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 30, pp. 241–247.Kayess, R. and French, P., (2008). Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Human Rights Law Review, 8(1), pp. 1–34. Available at: https://library.bsu.by:3116/10.1093/hrlr/ngm044 [Accessed 01.06.2021].Kayess, R. and French, P., (2008). Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Human Rights Law Review, 8(1), pp. 1–34. Available at: https://library.bsu.by:3116/10.1093/hrlr/ngm044 [Accessed 01.06.2021].Lawson, A. and Beckett, A.E., (2020). The social and human rights models of disability: towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Human Rights. 25(2), pp. 348–379, https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533.Lawson, A. and Beckett, A.E., (2020). The social and human rights models of disability: towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Human Rights. 25(2), pp. 348–379, https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533.Mabbett, D.H., (2005). Some are More Equal than Others: Definitions of Disability in Social Policy and Discrimination Law in Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 34(2), pp. 215–233, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404008554.Mabbett, D.H., (2005). Some are More Equal than Others: Definitions of Disability in Social Policy and Discrimination Law in Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 34(2), pp. 215–233, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404008554.Marcellini, A., (2018). The extraordinary development of sport for people with dis/abilities. What does it all mean? Alter, 12(2), pp. 94-104, doi: 10.1016/j.alter.2018.04.005.Marcellini, A., (2018). The extraordinary development of sport for people with dis/abilities. What does it all mean? Alter, 12(2), pp. 94-104, doi: 10.1016/j.alter.2018.04.005.Marks, D., (2009). Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19 (3), doi: 10.3109/09638289709166831.Marks, D., (2009). Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19 (3), doi: 10.3109/09638289709166831.Mégret, F., (2008). The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights? Human Rights Quarterly, 30(2), pp. 1–28. Available at: https://library.bsu.by:3607/article/237738.Mégret, F., (2008). The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights? Human Rights Quarterly, 30(2), pp. 1–28. Available at: https://library.bsu.by:3607/article/237738.Mswela, M., (2018). Does Albinism Fit Within the Legal Definition of Disability in the Employment Context? A Comparative Analysis of the Judicial Interpretation of Disability under the SA and the US Non-Discrimination Laws. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 21, pp. 1–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a1684.Mswela, M., (2018). Does Albinism Fit Within the Legal Definition of Disability in the Employment Context? A Comparative Analysis of the Judicial Interpretation of Disability under the SA and the US Non-Discrimination Laws. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 21, pp. 1–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a1684.Panaccio, C.-M., (2020). Apologia for a general doctrine of substantive equality and discrimination. Jurisprudence, 11(2), pp. 213224, doi: 10.1080/20403313.2020.1715110.Panaccio, C.-M., (2020). Apologia for a general doctrine of substantive equality and discrimination. Jurisprudence, 11(2), pp. 213224, doi: 10.1080/20403313.2020.1715110.Perlin, M., (2013). “There Must be Some Way Out of Here”: Why the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is Potentially the Best Weapon in the Fight Against Sanism. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 20(3), pp. 462–476.Perlin, M., (2013). “There Must be Some Way Out of Here”: Why the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is Potentially the Best Weapon in the Fight Against Sanism. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 20(3), pp. 462–476.Quinn, G. and Degener, T., (2002). The Moral Authority for Change: Human Rights Values and the World Wide Process of Disability Reform. Human Rights and Disability, 13(14).Quinn, G. and Degener, T., (2002). The Moral Authority for Change: Human Rights Values and the World Wide Process of Disability Reform. Human Rights and Disability, 13(14).Quinn, G. and Flynn, E., (2012). Transatlantic Borrowings: The Past and Future of EU Non-Discrimination Law and Policy on the Ground of Disability. American Journal of Comparative Law, 60(1), pp. 23–48.Quinn, G. and Flynn, E., (2012). Transatlantic Borrowings: The Past and Future of EU Non-Discrimination Law and Policy on the Ground of Disability. American Journal of Comparative Law, 60(1), pp. 23–48.Rakhmatov, A.A., (2016). The Olympic movement as a means of socialization of people with disabilities. Education and Upbringing, 2, p. 7.Rakhmatov, A.A., (2016). The Olympic movement as a means of socialization of people with disabilities. Education and Upbringing, 2, p. 7.Razuvaeva, T., Gut, Y., Lokteva, A., and Pchelkina. E., (2019). The problem of psychological rehabilitation of persons with disorders of the musculoskeletal system acquired in adulthood. Behavioral Sciences, 9(12), pp. 31–42, doi: 10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2021.2.3.Razuvaeva, T., Gut, Y., Lokteva, A., and Pchelkina. E., (2019). The problem of psychological rehabilitation of persons with disorders of the musculoskeletal system acquired in adulthood. Behavioral Sciences, 9(12), pp. 31–42, doi: 10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2021.2.3.Reel, K. and Davidson, S., (2018). Sexuality in rehabilitation: Supporting Canadian practitioners conceptually towards client enablement. Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 1(3), pp. 35–48, doi: 10.7202/1058250ar.Reel, K. and Davidson, S., (2018). Sexuality in rehabilitation: Supporting Canadian practitioners conceptually towards client enablement. Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 1(3), pp. 35–48, doi: 10.7202/1058250ar.Sanmiquel-Molinero, L. and Pujol-Tarrés, J., (2020). Putting emotions to work: The role of affective disablism and ableism in the constitution of the dis/abled subject. Disability and Society, 35(4), pp. 542–569.Sanmiquel-Molinero, L. and Pujol-Tarrés, J., (2020). Putting emotions to work: The role of affective disablism and ableism in the constitution of the dis/abled subject. Disability and Society, 35(4), pp. 542–569.Shakespeare, T. and Watson, N., (2002). The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology? In: Barnartt, S.N. and Altman, B.M., eds. Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where we are and where we need to go (Research in Social Science and Disability). Vol. 2. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X.Shakespeare, T. and Watson, N., (2002). The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology? In: Barnartt, S.N. and Altman, B.M., eds. Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where we are and where we need to go (Research in Social Science and Disability). Vol. 2. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X.Shakespeare, T., Cooper, H., Bezmez, D., and Poland, F., (2018). Rehabilitation as a disability equality issue: A conceptual shift for disability studies? Social Inclusion, 6(1), pp. 61–72, doi: 10.17645/si.v6i1.1175.Shakespeare, T., Cooper, H., Bezmez, D., and Poland, F., (2018). Rehabilitation as a disability equality issue: A conceptual shift for disability studies? Social Inclusion, 6(1), pp. 61–72, doi: 10.17645/si.v6i1.1175.Stein, M.A. and Lord, J.E., (2010). Monitoring the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Innovations, Lost Opportunities, and Future Potential. Human Rights Quarterly, 32 (3), doi: 10.2307/40784059.Stein, M.A. and Lord, J.E., (2010). Monitoring the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Innovations, Lost Opportunities, and Future Potential. Human Rights Quarterly, 32 (3), doi: 10.2307/40784059.Swain, J. and French, S., (2000). Towards an Affirmation Model of Disability. Disability & Society, 4(15), pp. 569–582, doi: 10.1080/09687590050058189.Swain, J. and French, S., (2000). Towards an Affirmation Model of Disability. Disability & Society, 4(15), pp. 569–582, doi: 10.1080/09687590050058189.Titchkosky, T., (2001). Disability: A Rose by Any Other Name? “People-First” Language in Canadian Society. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 38(2), pp. 125–140, doi: 10.1111/j.1755-618X.2001.tb00967.x.Titchkosky, T., (2001). Disability: A Rose by Any Other Name? “People-First” Language in Canadian Society. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 38(2), pp. 125–140, doi: 10.1111/j.1755-618X.2001.tb00967.x.Vanhala, L., (2015). The Diffusion of Disability Rights in Europe. Human Rights Quarterly, 37(4), pp. 831–853, doi: 10.1353/hrq.2015.0058.Vanhala, L., (2015). The Diffusion of Disability Rights in Europe. Human Rights Quarterly, 37(4), pp. 831–853, doi: 10.1353/hrq.2015.0058.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.