<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kulawr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Kutafin Law Review</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Kutafin Law Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2713-0525</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-0533</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MSAL</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/2713-0533.2023.4.26.872-889</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">kulawr-230</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS: USE OF SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE AND INTRODUCTION OF AI</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Explainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI): Reflections on Judicial System</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6831-1142</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Chaudhary</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Gyandeep Chaudhary, Doctor of Laws, Assistant Professor of Law</p><p>Researcher ID: HMP-5444-2023</p><p>Greater Noida</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">gyan.2889@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>Bennett University</institution><country>India</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>872</fpage><lpage>889</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Chaudhary G., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Chaudhary G.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Chaudhary G.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/230">https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/230</self-uri><abstract><p>Machine learning algorithms are increasingly being utilized in scenarios, such, as criminal, administrative and civil proceedings. However, there is growing concern regarding the lack of transparency and accountability due to the “black box” nature of these algorithms. This makes it challenging for judges’ to comprehend how decisions or predictions are reached. This paper aims to explore the significance of Explainable AI (xAI) in enhancing transparency and accountability within contexts. Additionally, it examines the role that the judicial system can play in developing xAI. The methodology involves a review of existing xAI research and a discussion on how feedback from the system can improve its effectiveness in legal settings. The argument presented is that xAI is crucial in contexts as it empowers judges to make informed decisions based on algorithmic outcomes. However, the lack of transparency, in decision-making processes can impede judge’s ability to do effectively. Therefore, implementing xAI can contribute to increasing transparency and accountability within this decision-making process. The judicial system has an opportunity to aid in the development of xAI by emulating reasoning customizing approaches according to specific jurisdictions and audiences and providing valuable feedback for improving this technology’s efficacy.</p><p>Hence the primary objective is to emphasize the significance of xAI in enhancing transparency and accountability, within settings well as the potential contribution of the judicial system, towards its advancement. Judges could consider asking about the rationale, behind outcomes. It is advisable for xAI systems to provide a clear account of the steps taken by algorithms to reach their conclusions or predictions. Additionally, it is proposed that public stakeholders have a role, in shaping xAI to guarantee ethical and socially responsible technology. </p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>explainable AI</kwd><kwd>black box</kwd><kwd>artificial intelligence</kwd><kwd>reasoned decisions</kwd><kwd>judicial system</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ankarstad, N., (2022). What is explainable AI (xAI)? Medium. Towards Data Science. Available at: https://towardsdatascience.com/what-is-explainable-ai-xai-afc56938d513 [Accessed 16.04.2023].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ankarstad, N., (2022). What is explainable AI (xAI)? Medium. Towards Data Science. Available at: https://towardsdatascience.com/what-is-explainable-ai-xai-afc56938d513 [Accessed 16.04.2023].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barak, A., (2008). The judge in a democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barak, A., (2008). The judge in a democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barredo Arrieta, A., et al., (2020). Explainable arti¿ cial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, pp. 82–115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barredo Arrieta, A., et al., (2020). Explainable arti¿ cial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, pp. 82–115.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Belenguer, L., (2022). Ai Bias: Exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI and Ethics, 2(4), pp. 771–787.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belenguer, L., (2022). Ai Bias: Exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI and Ethics, 2(4), pp. 771–787.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chaudhary, G., (2020). Arti¿ cial Intelligence: The Liability Paradox. ILI Law Review, Summer, pp. 144–162.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chaudhary, G., (2020). Arti¿ cial Intelligence: The Liability Paradox. ILI Law Review, Summer, pp. 144–162.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Citron, D., (2008). Technological Due Process. Washington University Law Review, 85, p. 1254.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Citron, D., (2008). Technological Due Process. Washington University Law Review, 85, p. 1254.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coglianese, C., (2021). Administrative law in the automated state. Daedalus, 150(3), pp. 104–120.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coglianese, C., (2021). Administrative law in the automated state. Daedalus, 150(3), pp. 104–120.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coglianese, C. and Lehr, D., (2019). Transparency and Algorithmic Governance. Administrative Law Review, 71(1), pp. 18–38.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coglianese, C. and Lehr, D., (2019). Transparency and Algorithmic Governance. Administrative Law Review, 71(1), pp. 18–38.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cuéllar, M., (2017). Cyberdelegation and the Administrative State. In: Parillo, N.R. (ed.) Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of Jerry L. Mashaw. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 135–140.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cuéllar, M., (2017). Cyberdelegation and the Administrative State. In: Parillo, N.R. (ed.) Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of Jerry L. Mashaw. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 135–140.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deeks, A., (2019). The Judicial Demand for Explainable Arti¿ cial Intelligence. Columbia Law Review, 119(7), p. 1829.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deeks, A., (2019). The Judicial Demand for Explainable Arti¿ cial Intelligence. Columbia Law Review, 119(7), p. 1829.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Devins, N. and Klein, D., (2017). The Vanishing Common Law Judge? University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165, pp. 595–630.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Devins, N. and Klein, D., (2017). The Vanishing Common Law Judge? University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165, pp. 595–630.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dressel, J. and Farid, H., (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science Advances, 4(1).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dressel, J. and Farid, H., (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science Advances, 4(1).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edwards, L. and Veale, M., (2017). Slave to the algorithm? Why a “right to an explanation” is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law &amp; Technology Review, 16(1), p. 67.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edwards, L. and Veale, M., (2017). Slave to the algorithm? Why a “right to an explanation” is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law &amp; Technology Review, 16(1), p. 67.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goodman, C.C., (2019). AI/Esq.: Impacts of Arti¿ cial Intelligence in Lawyer-Client Relationships. Oklahoma Law Review, 72(1), p. 149.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goodman, C.C., (2019). AI/Esq.: Impacts of Arti¿ cial Intelligence in Lawyer-Client Relationships. Oklahoma Law Review, 72(1), p. 149.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guidotti, R., et al., (2018). A survey of methods for explaining Black Box Models. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(5), pp. 1–42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guidotti, R., et al., (2018). A survey of methods for explaining Black Box Models. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(5), pp. 1–42.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gunning, D. and Aha, D., (2019). DARPA’s Explainable Arti¿ cial Intelligence (xAI) program. AI Magazine, 40(2), pp. 44–58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gunning, D. and Aha, D., (2019). DARPA’s Explainable Arti¿ cial Intelligence (xAI) program. AI Magazine, 40(2), pp. 44–58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lehr, D. and Coglianese, C., (2017). Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era. Georgetown Law Journal, 105, p. 1147.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lehr, D. and Coglianese, C., (2017). Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era. Georgetown Law Journal, 105, p. 1147.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Markus, A.F., Kors, J.A. and Rijnbeek, P.R., (2021). The role of explainability in creating trustworthy arti¿ cial intelligence for Health Care: A Comprehensive Survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 113, p. 103655.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Markus, A.F., Kors, J.A. and Rijnbeek, P.R., (2021). The role of explainability in creating trustworthy arti¿ cial intelligence for Health Care: A Comprehensive Survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 113, p. 103655.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mortazavi, M., (2017). Rulemaking Ex Machina. Columbia Law Review Online, 117, pp. 207–208.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mortazavi, M., (2017). Rulemaking Ex Machina. Columbia Law Review Online, 117, pp. 207–208.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Naik, N., et al., (2022). Legal and ethical consideration in arti¿ cial intelligence in Healthcare: Who takes responsibility? Frontiers in Surgery, 9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Naik, N., et al., (2022). Legal and ethical consideration in arti¿ cial intelligence in Healthcare: Who takes responsibility? Frontiers in Surgery, 9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Petch, J., Di, S. and Nelson, W., (2022). Opening the black box: The promise and limitations of explainable machine learning in Cardiology. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 38(2), pp. 204–213.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petch, J., Di, S. and Nelson, W., (2022). Opening the black box: The promise and limitations of explainable machine learning in Cardiology. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 38(2), pp. 204–213.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rachlinski, J., (2006). Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Lawmaking. University of Chicago Law Review, 73, p. 934.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rachlinski, J., (2006). Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Lawmaking. University of Chicago Law Review, 73, p. 934.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reiling, A.D., (2020). Courts and arti¿ cial intelligence. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reiling, A.D., (2020). Courts and arti¿ cial intelligence. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Santoni de Sio, F. and Mecacci, G., (2021). Four responsibility gaps with Arti¿ cial Intelligence: Why they matter and how to address them. Philosophy &amp; Technology, 34(4), pp. 1057–1084.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Santoni de Sio, F. and Mecacci, G., (2021). Four responsibility gaps with Arti¿ cial Intelligence: Why they matter and how to address them. Philosophy &amp; Technology, 34(4), pp. 1057–1084.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sarker, I.H., (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and Research Directions. SN Computer Science, 2(3).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sarker, I.H., (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and Research Directions. SN Computer Science, 2(3).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sjödin, D., et al., (2021). How AI Capabilities Enable Business Model Innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops. Journal of Business Research, 134, pp. 574–587.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sjödin, D., et al., (2021). How AI Capabilities Enable Business Model Innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops. Journal of Business Research, 134, pp. 574–587.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smith, A., (2020). Using Arti¿ cial Intelligence and Algorithms. Federal Trade Commission. 8 April. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2020/04/using-artificial-intelligence-andalgorithms [Accessed 11.11.2023].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith, A., (2020). Using Arti¿ cial Intelligence and Algorithms. Federal Trade Commission. 8 April. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2020/04/using-artificial-intelligence-andalgorithms [Accessed 11.11.2023].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smith, R.A., (2017). Opening the lid on criminal sentencing software. Duke Today. 19 July. Available at: https://today.duke.edu/2017/07/opening-lid-criminal-sentencing-software [Accessed 11.11.2023].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith, R.A., (2017). Opening the lid on criminal sentencing software. Duke Today. 19 July. Available at: https://today.duke.edu/2017/07/opening-lid-criminal-sentencing-software [Accessed 11.11.2023].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stevenson, M.T. and Slobogin, C., (2018). Algorithmic risk assessments and the double-edged sword of youth. Behavioral Sciences &amp; the Law, 36(5), pp. 638–656.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stevenson, M.T. and Slobogin, C., (2018). Algorithmic risk assessments and the double-edged sword of youth. Behavioral Sciences &amp; the Law, 36(5), pp. 638–656.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Strauss, D.A., (1996). Common law constitutional interpretation. The University of Chicago Law Review, 63(3), p. 877.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Strauss, D.A., (1996). Common law constitutional interpretation. The University of Chicago Law Review, 63(3), p. 877.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vilone, G. and Longo, L., (2021). Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Information Fusion, 76, pp. 89–106.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vilone, G. and Longo, L., (2021). Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Information Fusion, 76, pp. 89–106.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. and Russell, C., (2017). Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Technology, 31, pp. 841–850.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. and Russell, C., (2017). Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Technology, 31, pp. 841–850.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wulff, K. and Finnestrand, H., (2023). Creating meaningful work in the age of AI: Explainable AI, explainability, and why it matters to organizational designers. AI and Society [Preprint].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wulff, K. and Finnestrand, H., (2023). Creating meaningful work in the age of AI: Explainable AI, explainability, and why it matters to organizational designers. AI and Society [Preprint].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
