kulawrKutafin Law ReviewKutafin Law Review2713-05252713-0533MSAL10.17803/2313-5395.2017.2.8.299-314kulawr-26Research ArticleCRITICAL SCHOOL OF THOUGHT IN INTERNATIONAL LAWNational Security as a Foundation and a Limit on a State’s Right to Rely on Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural ResourcesBoklanD. S.dboklan@hse.ruKorshunovaA. V.anna.v.korshunova@gmail.comNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian FederationRussian Foreign Trade AcademyRussian Federation20172904202042299314Copyright © Boklan D.S., Korshunova A.V., 20202020Boklan D.S., Korshunova A.V.Boklan D.S., Korshunova A.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/26

The article focuses on the environmental and economic security of a State as the constituent elements of its national security protected by the principle of permanent sovereignty over natural resources. It also analyses interdependency of the two, exposing their practical interconnection in a way that a threat to environmental stability almost necessarily affects economic stability of a State. At the same time, a right to permanent sovereignty over natural resources is not absolute and should be exercised so as not to endanger environmental and economic security of others.

National securitypermanent sovereignty over natural resourcesinternational environmental lawtransboundary harminternational economic lawprecautionary principleReferencesAbshahidze, A., Kopylov, M., Lukashuk, I., and others (2007). International law. Textbook (ed. Kuznetcov, V., Tuzmukhamedov, B.). (In Russ.).Abshahidze, A., Kopylov, M., Lukashuk, I., and others (2007). International law. Textbook (ed. Kuznetcov, V., Tuzmukhamedov, B.). (In Russ.).Anufrieva, L., Bekyashev, K., Dmitrieva, G., and others (2005). Public International Law. Textbook (ed. Bekyashev, K.). (In Russ.).Anufrieva, L., Bekyashev, K., Dmitrieva, G., and others (2005). Public International Law. Textbook (ed. Bekyashev, K.). (In Russ.).Anufrieva, L., Shinkaretckaya, G., Shoumilov, V. and others (2012). International law. Textbook (ed. Melkov, G.). (In Russ.).Anufrieva, L., Shinkaretckaya, G., Shoumilov, V. and others (2012). International law. Textbook (ed. Melkov, G.). (In Russ.).Ashavsky, B., Biryukov, M., Chernichenko, S., and others (2006). International law. Textbook (eds. Kovalev, A., Chernichenko, S.). (In Russ.).Ashavsky, B., Biryukov, M., Chernichenko, S., and others (2006). International law. Textbook (eds. Kovalev, A., Chernichenko, S.). (In Russ.).Bekyashev, K., Kopylov, M., Valeev, R., and others (2012). International environmental law. Textbook (ed. Valeev, R.). (In Russ.).Bekyashev, K., Kopylov, M., Valeev, R., and others (2012). International environmental law. Textbook (ed. Valeev, R.). (In Russ.).Bekyashev, K. (2008). Principle of respect to sovereignty of a State as an underlying principle of general international law. Lex Russica. No. 4. (In Russ.).Bekyashev, K. (2008). Principle of respect to sovereignty of a State as an underlying principle of general international law. Lex Russica. No. 4. (In Russ.).Biryukov, P. (2013). International Law. Textbook. Yurist. (In Russ.). Brinchuk, M. (2004). Enviromental Law. (In Russ.).Biryukov, P. (2013). International Law. Textbook. Yurist. (In Russ.). Brinchuk, M. (2004). Enviromental Law. (In Russ.).Brinchuk, M. (2012). The Universe as a universal natural environment: legal and philosophical aspects. Astrakhan Review of Environmental Education. No. 2 (18). (In Russ.).Brinchuk, M. (2012). The Universe as a universal natural environment: legal and philosophical aspects. Astrakhan Review of Environmental Education. No. 2 (18). (In Russ.).Chernichenko, S. (2010). Could we divide state sovereignty? Eurasian Law Journal. No. 12 (31). (In Russ.).Chernichenko, S. (2010). Could we divide state sovereignty? Eurasian Law Journal. No. 12 (31). (In Russ.).Dubovik, O., Kremer, L., Luybbe-Volff, G. (2005). Enviromental law. Textbook (ed. Dubovik, O.). (In Russ.).Dubovik, O., Kremer, L., Luybbe-Volff, G. (2005). Enviromental law. Textbook (ed. Dubovik, O.). (In Russ.).Galizzi, P. (1997). Economic Instruments as Tools for the Protection of the International Environment. European Energy and Environmental Law Review.Galizzi, P. (1997). Economic Instruments as Tools for the Protection of the International Environment. European Energy and Environmental Law Review.Getman-Pavlova, I. (2006). International law. Textbook. (In Russ.).Getman-Pavlova, I. (2006). International law. Textbook. (In Russ.).Kopylov, M. (2000). On the legal meaning of the concept “environmental security”. Pravovedenie. No. 1. (In Russ.).Kopylov, M. (2000). On the legal meaning of the concept “environmental security”. Pravovedenie. No. 1. (In Russ.).Koskenniemi, M. (2011). What Use for Sovereignty Today? Asian Journal of International Law. No. 1.Koskenniemi, M. (2011). What Use for Sovereignty Today? Asian Journal of International Law. No. 1.Kovalev, A. (2007). Intetrnational economic law and legal framework of international economic activity. Textbook. (In Russ.).Kovalev, A. (2007). Intetrnational economic law and legal framework of international economic activity. Textbook. (In Russ.).Kuzmin, E. (2007). International economic law. Textbook. (In Russ.).Kuzmin, E. (2007). International economic law. Textbook. (In Russ.).Lauterpacht, H. (1958). The Development of International Law by the International Court. Grotius Publications Limited.Lauterpacht, H. (1958). The Development of International Law by the International Court. Grotius Publications Limited.Lukashuk, I. (2008). International law. Textbook, general part. (In Russ.).Lukashuk, I. (2008). International law. Textbook, general part. (In Russ.).Matveevsky, Y. (1999). Environmental problems have significant impact on relations of Russia and European Union. Europe. No. 3. (In Russ.).Matveevsky, Y. (1999). Environmental problems have significant impact on relations of Russia and European Union. Europe. No. 3. (In Russ.).Pavlov, D., Bukvareva, E. (2007). Biodiversity, ecosystem functions and life support of humanity. RAN Review. No. 11. (In Russ.).Pavlov, D., Bukvareva, E. (2007). Biodiversity, ecosystem functions and life support of humanity. RAN Review. No. 11. (In Russ.).Perrez, F. X. (1996). The Relationship Between “Permanent Sovereignty” and the Obligation not to Cause Transboundary Environmental Damage. Environmental Law. 26. 1187.Perrez, F. X. (1996). The Relationship Between “Permanent Sovereignty” and the Obligation not to Cause Transboundary Environmental Damage. Environmental Law. 26. 1187.Purtov, A. (2001). Principle of mutual benefit in international economic law. (In Russ.).Purtov, A. (2001). Principle of mutual benefit in international economic law. (In Russ.).Schrijver, N. (1997). Sovereignty over Natural Resources. Balancing Rights and Duties. Cambridge.Schrijver, N. (1997). Sovereignty over Natural Resources. Balancing Rights and Duties. Cambridge.Shoumilov, V. (2002). International Economic Law. (In Russ.).Shoumilov, V. (2002). International Economic Law. (In Russ.).Velyaminov, G. (2004). International Economic Law and Procedure. (In Russ.).Velyaminov, G. (2004). International Economic Law and Procedure. (In Russ.).Vylegzhanin, A. (2015). Issues of correlation and interaction of international relations and international law, in Ivanov, I. (ed.). Modern science of international relations abroad. (In Russ.).Vylegzhanin, A. (2015). Issues of correlation and interaction of international relations and international law, in Ivanov, I. (ed.). Modern science of international relations abroad. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.