References

kulawr

Kutafin Law Review

2713-05252713-0533

MSAL

10.17803/2713-0533.2024.3.29.415-451

kulawr-343

Research Article

DIGITAL LAW, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CYBER SECURITY

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Legal Frameworks: Identifying Challenges and Proposing Regulatory Reforms

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6673-319X

Sharma

A. K.

Animesh Kumar Sharma, PhD in Marketing, Research Scholar, Mittal School of Business

Phagwara, Punjab

mr.animesh@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-7527

Sharma

Dr. Rahul Sharma, PhD in Marketing, Professor, Mittal School of Business

Phagwara, Punjab

rahul.12234@lpu.co.in

Lovely Professional UniversityIndia

2024

16102024

113415451

2024

Sharma A.K., Sharma R.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/343

This research paper seeks to understand the deficit arising from the generative AI and its potential in redefying various sectors and suggesting modification on the current laws. Generative AI systems can generate distinctive content which could be used in text, images, or music, among others, by training from the available data. It highlights how generative AI influences the legal profession in terms of work like contract writing, as well as how newer language models like GPT-4 and chatbots like ChatGPT and Gemini are evolving. Thus, while generative AI has numerous opportunities, it also raises concerns about ethical issues, authorship and ownership, privacy, and abuses, such as the propagation of deepfakes and fake news. This study focuses attention on the importance of strengthening the legal frameworks to answer the ethical issues and challenges linked to generative AI, such as deepfakes, piracy of contents, discriminative impact, or naked breaches of privacy. It calls for proper and sensitive use of generative AI through regulation, openness, and commonly agreed global guidelines. This paper emphasizes that innovations need to be balanced by a set of effective regulations to unleash the potential of generative AI and minimize potential threats.

Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AIGAI)legal frameworksregulatory reformsIntellectual Property (IP)

References1

Anderljung, M. and Hazell, J., (2023). Protecting Society from AI Misuse: When are Restrictions on Capabilities Warranted? arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09377, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.09377.

AydÕn, Ö. and Karaarslan, E., (2023). Is ChatGPT leading generative AI? What is beyond expectations? Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, 11(3), pp. 118–134, doi: 10.21541/apjess.1293702.

Bontridder, N. and Poullet, Y., (2021). The role of arti¿ cial intelligence in disinformation. Data & Policy, 3, p. e32, doi: 10.1017/dap.2021.20.

Campbell, C., Plangger, K., Sands, S. and Kietzmann, J., (2022). Preparing for an era of deepfakes and AI-generated ads: A framework for understanding responses to manipulated advertising. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), pp. 22–38, doi: 10.1080/00913367.2021.1909515.

Chan, A., (2023). GPT-3 and InstructGPT: Technological dystopianism, utopianism, and “Contextual” perspectives in AI ethics and industry. AI and Ethics, 3(1), pp. 53–64, doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00148-6.

Chaturvedi, S. and Kumar, H., (2019). Deepfakes and beyond: The new landscape of political propaganda. The Hindu. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/elections/lok-sabha/from-it-bots-to-aideepfakes-the-evolution-of-election-related-misinformation-in-india/article68015342.ece [Accessed 15.05.2024].

Cuthbertson, A., (2018). Obama deepfake warns of “terrifying” future for fake news. The Independent. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/obama-deepfakejordan-peele-video-fake-news-a8313901.html [Accessed 11.05.2024].

De Angelis, L., Baglivo, F., Arzilli, G., Privitera, G.P., Ferragina, P., Tozzi, A.E. and Rizzo, C., (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166120.

De Rancourt-Raymond, A. and Smaili, N., (2023). The unethical use of deepfakes. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), pp. 1066–1077, doi: 10.1108/JFC-04-2022-0090.

Dogru, T., Line, N., Hanks, L., Acikgoz, F., Abbott, J.A., Bakir, S., Berbekova, A., Bilgihan, A., Iskender, A., Kizildag, M. and Lee, M., (2023). The implications of generative arti¿ cial intelligence in academic research and higher education in tourism and hospitality. Tourism Economics, pp. 1083–1094, doi: 10.1177/13548166231204065.

Dwivedi, Y.K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A. and Galanos, V., (2021). Arti¿ cial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, pp. 1–47, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002.

Dwivedi, Y.K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A.K., Baabdullah, A.M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M. and Albanna, H., (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, pp. 1–63, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.

Ferrara, E., (2023). Fairness and bias in arti¿ cial intelligence: A brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Sci, 6(1), pp. 1–15, doi: 10.3390/sci6010003.

Fiske, A., Henningsen, P. and Buyx, A., (2019). Your robot therapist will see you now: ethical implications of embodied arti¿ cial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(5), p. e13216, doi: 10.2196/13216.

George, A.S. and George, A.H., (2023). Deepfakes: The Evolution of Hyper Realistic Media Manipulation. Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication, 1(2), pp. 58–74, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10148558.

Haluza, D. and Jungwirth, D., (2023). Arti¿ cial Intelligence and Ten Societal Megatrends: An Exploratory Study Using GPT-3. Systems, 11(3), pp. 1–18, doi: 10.3390/systems11030120.

He, T., (2019). The sentimental fools and the ¿ ctitious authors: rethinking the copyright issues of AI-generated contents in China. Asia Paci¿ c Law Review, 27(2), pp. 218–238, doi: 10.1080/10192557.2019.1703520.

Illia, L., Colleoni, E. and Zyglidopoulos, S., (2023). Ethical implications of text generation in the age of arti¿ cial intelligence. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(1), pp. 201–210, doi: 10.1111/beer.12479.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M. and Vayena, E., (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature machine intelligence, 1(9), pp. 389–399, doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.

Kar, A.K., Varsha, P.S. and Rajan, S., (2023). Unravelling the impact of generative arti¿ cial intelligence (GAI) in industrial applications: A review of scienti¿ c and grey literature. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(4), pp. 659–689, doi: 10.1007/s40171-023-00356-x.

Khowaja, S.A., Khuwaja, P., Dev, K., Wang, W. and Nkenyereye, L., (2024). Chatgpt needs spade (sustainability, privacy, digital divide, and ethics) evaluation: A review. Cognitive Computation, pp. 1–23, doi: 10.1007/s12559-024-10285-1.

Kietzmann, J., Lee, L.W., McCarthy, I.P. and Kietzmann, T.C., (2020). Deepfakes: Trick or treat? Business Horizons, 63(2), pp. 135–146, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006.

King, Y.M., (2023). Written Statement: Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith. Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 23 (1), pp. 124–126.

Ling, D., (2023). Analysis on Tort Liability of Generative Arti¿ cial Intelligence. Science of Law Journal, 2(12), pp. 102–107, doi: 10.23977/law.2023.021215.

Lucaj, L., van der Smagt, P. and Benbouzid, D., (2023). AI Regulation Is (not) All You Need. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 1267–1279, doi: 10.1145/3593013.3594079.

Maras, M.H. and Alexandrou, A., (2019). Determining authenticity of video evidence in the age of arti¿ cial intelligence and in the wake of Deepfake videos. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 23(3), pp. 255–262, doi: 10.1177/1365712718807226.

Meskys, E., Kalpokiene, J., Jurcys, P. and Liaudanskas, A., (2020). Regulating deep fakes: legal and ethical considerations. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15(1), pp. 24–31.

Mittelstadt, B., (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature machine intelligence, 1(11), pp. 501–507, doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4.

Mondal, S., Das, S. and Vrana, V.G., (2023). How to bell the cat? A theoretical review of generative arti¿ cial intelligence towards digital disruption in all walks of life. Technologies, 11(2), pp. 1–17, doi: 10.3390/technologies11020044.

Montasari, R., (2024). Responding to Deepfake Challenges in the United Kingdom: Legal and Technical Insights with Recommendations. In: Cyberspace, Cyberterrorism and the International Security in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Threats, Assessment and Responses. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 241–258, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-50454-9_12.

Moulaei, K., Yadegari, A., Baharestani, M., Farzanbakhsh, S., Sabet, B. and Afrash, M.R., (2024). Generative arti¿ cial intelligence in healthcare: A scoping review on bene¿ ts, challenges and applications. International Journal of Medical Informatics, p. 105474, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105474.

Pérez, J., Castro, M. and López, G., (2023). Serious Games and AI: Challenges and Opportunities for Computational Social Science. IEEE Access, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3286695.

Porsdam Mann, S., Earp, B.D., Nyholm, S., Danaher, J., Møller, N., Bowman-Smart, H., Hatherley, J., Koplin, J., Plozza, M., Rodger, D. and Treit, P.V., (2023). Generative AI entails a credit — blame asymmetry. Nature Machine Intelligence, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1038/s42256-023-00653-1.

Romero Moreno, F., (2024). Generative AI and deepfakes: a human rights approach to tackling harmful content. International Review of Law. Computers & Technology, pp. 1–30, doi: 10.1080/13600869.2024.2324540.

Shoaib, M.R., Wang, Z., Ahvanooey, M.T. and Zhao, J., (2023). Deepfakes, misinformation, and disinformation in the era of frontier ai, generative ai, and large ai models. 2023 International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA), pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/ICCA59364.2023.10401723.

Thongmeensuk, S., (2024). Rethinking copyright exceptions in the era of generative AI: Balancing innovation and intellectual property protection. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, pp. 1–15, doi: 10.1111/jwip.12301.

Uzun, L., (2023). ChatGPT and academic integrity concerns: Detecting arti¿ cial intelligence generated content. Language Education and Technology, 3(1), pp. 45–54. Available at: http://www.langedutech.com/letjournal/index.php/let/article/view/49/36 [Accessed 11.05.2024].

Yang, Z., Wu, J.G. and Xie, H., (2024). Taming Frankenstein’s monster: Ethical considerations relating to generative arti¿ cial intelligence in education. Asia Paci¿ c Journal of Education, pp. 1–14, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2023.2300137.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.