kulawrKutafin Law ReviewKutafin Law Review2713-05252713-0533MSAL10.17803/2713-0533.2025.3.33.733-753kulawr-652Research ArticleROLE OF RELIGIONS IN RESOLVING DISPUTESThe Role of Church and State in the Resolution of Marital and Family Disputes: Historical and Legal Analysis of Mediation Procedureshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3010-1094MunV.

Victoria A. Mun, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of History of the State and Law

Moscow

mun.viktoriya@mail.ruKutafi n Moscow State Law University (MSAL)Russian Federation202528092025123733753Copyright © Mun V., 20252025Mun V.Mun V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/652

The paper examines the role of the Russian Orthodox Church in mediating marital and family disputes in pre-revolutionary Russia, emphasizing the perspective of canonists on reconciliation as the cornerstone of family stability. By exploring this transitional period in Russian history, the study reveals the Church’s influence on resolving familial conflicts prior to the advent of the Soviet regime. An analysis of archival documents from the State Archive of the Russian Federation (Fund R3431), particularly the minutes and transcripts of the 1918 Synod sessions addressing the grounds for dissolution of church marriages, highlights significant unresolved issues in church law regarding marriage and family matters during the pre-revolutionary period. With the rise of the Soviet regime, the previously strict legal framework allowed us to identify the key issues of marriage and family in the church law that were calling for a solution but received no relevant and timely response in the pre-revolutionary period. With the establishment of the Soviet regime, strict laws that viewed marriage as “one’s cross to bear” and family life as an “ordeal”, patriarchal traditions that negatively perceived the idea of marriage dissolution, were replaced in the Soviet period by freedom of both marriage and its dissolution. The author highlights that with the decline of religious foundations in traditional family structures, the role of mediation practices employed by Soviet courts in resolving marital and family disputes gained prominence. In particular, the study explores the social and ideological factors that influenced the evolution of mediation procedures within the context of family dispute resolution during the formative years of communist ideology and the establishment of the socialist family model. The introduction of previously inaccessible archival sources from the State Archive of the Russian Federation (Fund R9474) that provide a comprehensive analysis of the application of the Fundamentals of Legislation of the USSR and Union Republics on Marriage and Family has enabled the identification of distinctive characteristics of mediation practices during the Soviet period.

family mediationmediation proceduresdivorcedissolution of marriagefamilythe USSRthe Soviet courtfamily lawchurch lawmarital and family disputesthe Russian Orthodox Churchweddingspiritual courtReferencesAlyakrinsky, A.I., (1927). Desyat let raboty v oblasti aktov grazhdanskogo sostoyaniya. Administrativnyy vestnik, 10–11, pp. 47–56. (In Russ.).Alyakrinsky, A.I., (1927). Desyat let raboty v oblasti aktov grazhdanskogo sostoyaniya. Administrativnyy vestnik, 10–11, pp. 47–56. (In Russ.).Belyakova, E.V., Belyakova, N.A., and Yemchenko, E.B., (2011). Zhenshchina v pravoslavii: tserkovnoe pravo i rossiiskaia praktika. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole Publ. (In Russ.).Belyakova, E.V., Belyakova, N.A., and Yemchenko, E.B., (2011). Zhenshchina v pravoslavii: tserkovnoe pravo i rossiiskaia praktika. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole Publ. (In Russ.).Katz, A.K., (1982). Osobennosti rassmotreniya sudami del, voznikayushchikh iz brachno-semeynykh otnosheniy: uchebnoye posobiye. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovsk Law Institute Publ. (In Russ.).Katz, A.K., (1982). Osobennosti rassmotreniya sudami del, voznikayushchikh iz brachno-semeynykh otnosheniy: uchebnoye posobiye. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovsk Law Institute Publ. (In Russ.).Krasnozhen, M.E., (1904). Staryye i novyye zakony o razvode. Yuriev: K. Mattisen’s Typ. Publ. (In Russ.).Krasnozhen, M.E., (1904). Staryye i novyye zakony o razvode. Yuriev: K. Mattisen’s Typ. Publ. (In Russ.).Nechaeva, A.M., (1982). Vypolneniye sudom konstitutsionnoy obyazannosti po zashchite sem’i. Sovetskaya yustitsiya, 19, pp. 11–12. (In Russ.).Nechaeva, A.M., (1982). Vypolneniye sudom konstitutsionnoy obyazannosti po zashchite sem’i. Sovetskaya yustitsiya, 19, pp. 11–12. (In Russ.).Palastina, S.Ya., (1979). Sem’ya, pravo, sotsiologiya. Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo, 6, pp. 43–50. (In Russ.).Palastina, S.Ya., (1979). Sem’ya, pravo, sotsiologiya. Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo, 6, pp. 43–50. (In Russ.).Rabinovich, N.V., (1956). Rol’ sovetskogo prava v ukreplenii sem’i. Leningrad. (In Russ.).Rabinovich, N.V., (1956). Rol’ sovetskogo prava v ukreplenii sem’i. Leningrad. (In Russ.).Shumilov, N., (1950). Rol’ suda v ukreplenii sem’i v sovetskom gosudarstve. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost’, 2, pp. 21–27. (In Russ.).Shumilov, N., (1950). Rol’ suda v ukreplenii sem’i v sovetskom gosudarstve. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost’, 2, pp. 21–27. (In Russ.).Skomorokhov, P., (1957). Brakorazvodnaya kanitel [The endless saga of divorce proceedings]. Literaturnaya gazeta, 143, p. 2. (In Russ.).Skomorokhov, P., (1957). Brakorazvodnaya kanitel [The endless saga of divorce proceedings]. Literaturnaya gazeta, 143, p. 2. (In Russ.).Sposobin, D.A., (1898). O razvode v Rossii [On divorce in Russia]. Moscow: Typ. M.N. Lavrova & Co. Publ. (In Russ.).Sposobin, D.A., (1898). O razvode v Rossii [On divorce in Russia]. Moscow: Typ. M.N. Lavrova & Co. Publ. (In Russ.).Suvorov, N.S., (1896). Grazhdanskiy brak [Civil Law Marriage]. St. Petersburg: Ya. Kantorovich Publ. (In Russ.).Suvorov, N.S., (1896). Grazhdanskiy brak [Civil Law Marriage]. St. Petersburg: Ya. Kantorovich Publ. (In Russ.).Yanenko, O. Yu., (2013). Divorce in the Russian Empire at the turn of XIX–XX centuries. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series “Social Sciences and the Humanities”, 1, vol. 13, pp. 192–194. (In Russ.).Yanenko, O. Yu., (2013). Divorce in the Russian Empire at the turn of XIX–XX centuries. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series “Social Sciences and the Humanities”, 1, vol. 13, pp. 192–194. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.