kulawrKutafin Law ReviewKutafin Law Review2713-05252713-0533MSAL10.17803/2313-5395.2018.2.10.423-432kulawr-67Research ArticleINTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENTSThe Nature and Application of Lex Mercatoria in the Light of Amiable CompositionMoskvinaA.www.kulawr.ruBureau of legal expertise, LLCRussian Federation20182904202052423432Copyright © Moskvina A., 20202020Moskvina A.Moskvina A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/67

This article discusses the nature of procedure of amiable composition in international commercial arbitration and analyses the nature of lex mercatoria in the light of this procedure. The author also examines procedural issues of application of lex mercatoria in the course of amiable composition and in the case of usual determination of applicable law.

International arbitrationlex mercatoriaamiable compositeurex aequo et bonoprivate international lawReferencesGoldman B. The Applicable Law: General Principles of Law - the Lex Mercatoria, Contemporary Problems in International Arbitration. 1986. Pp. 113-125, at 116.Goldman B. The Applicable Law: General Principles of Law - the Lex Mercatoria, Contemporary Problems in International Arbitration. 1986. Pp. 113-125, at 116.Goldman B. 2008. Introduction in Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration, as cited in Nikitas E. Hatzimihail. The Many Lives - and Faces - of Lex Mercatoria: History as Genealogy in International Business Law. Law and Contemporary Problems. Summer 2008. P. 170.Goldman B. 2008. Introduction in Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration, as cited in Nikitas E. Hatzimihail. The Many Lives - and Faces - of Lex Mercatoria: History as Genealogy in International Business Law. Law and Contemporary Problems. Summer 2008. P. 170.Cremades B., Plehn S. The New Lex Mercatoria and the Harmonization of the Laws of the of International Commercial Transactions, as cited in Hatzimihail, above n. 4, 170.Cremades B., Plehn S. The New Lex Mercatoria and the Harmonization of the Laws of the of International Commercial Transactions, as cited in Hatzimihail, above n. 4, 170.Naon H. G. The Transnational Law of International Commercial Transactions, as cited in Hatzimihail, above n. 4, 170.Naon H. G. The Transnational Law of International Commercial Transactions, as cited in Hatzimihail, above n. 4, 170.Horn N. Introduction in Transnational Law, as cited in Hatzimihail, above n. 4, 170.Horn N. Introduction in Transnational Law, as cited in Hatzimihail, above n. 4, 170.Horn N. The Use of Transnational Law in the Contract Law of International Trade and Finance, as cited in Hatzimihail, above n. 4, 170.Horn N. The Use of Transnational Law in the Contract Law of International Trade and Finance, as cited in Hatzimihail, above n. 4, 170.Blackaby N., Partasides C., Redfern A., Hunter M. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford, University Press, 2009. 228 p.Blackaby N., Partasides C., Redfern A., Hunter M. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford, University Press, 2009. 228 p.Ibid, Pp. 227-228.Ibid, Pp. 227-228.ICC arbitral award 3131 (1979) as cited in Pabalk Tikaret Limited Sirketi c. Norsolor S.A, in Jarvin, Derains, ICC Awards 1974-1985, p. 122 et seq.ICC arbitral award 3131 (1979) as cited in Pabalk Tikaret Limited Sirketi c. Norsolor S.A, in Jarvin, Derains, ICC Awards 1974-1985, p. 122 et seq.ICC study, above n 20, 24.ICC study, above n 20, 24.Award in ICC Case 3131 (1979), above 36Award in ICC Case 3131 (1979), above 36Varady T., Barcelo J.J.III, von Mehren A.T. international Commercial Arbitration: a transnational Perspective. 5th ed. American Casebook Series. West, 2012. 707 p.Varady T., Barcelo J.J.III, von Mehren A.T. international Commercial Arbitration: a transnational Perspective. 5th ed. American Casebook Series. West, 2012. 707 p.Interim Award in ICC Case 9474, 2001. 12(2) ICC ICArb. Bull.Interim Award in ICC Case 9474, 2001. 12(2) ICC ICArb. Bull.Award in ICC Case 9797. 2000. URL: http://www.unilex.info/case. cfm?pid=2&id=668&do=case (accessed 4 January 2018).Award in ICC Case 9797. 2000. URL: http://www.unilex.info/case. cfm?pid=2&id=668&do=case (accessed 4 January 2018).ICC Rules of Arbitration, art. 21.3. URL: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration/ (accessed 4 January 2018).ICC Rules of Arbitration, art. 21.3. URL: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration/ (accessed 4 January 2018).UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (as revised in 2010), art. 35 URL: https:// www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-revised/arb-rules-revised-2010-e.pdf (accessed 4 January 2018).UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (as revised in 2010), art. 35 URL: https:// www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-revised/arb-rules-revised-2010-e.pdf (accessed 4 January 2018).Zakon RF ot 07.07.1993 No. 5338-1 (red. ot 29.12.2015) “O mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe”. Legal reference system “KonsultantPlus” [Electronic resource].Zakon RF ot 07.07.1993 No. 5338-1 (red. ot 29.12.2015) “O mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe”. Legal reference system “KonsultantPlus” [Electronic resource].Komarov A.S. The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Russian View. Uniform Law Review, 1996. Issue 2, Vol. 1, p. 256.Komarov A.S. The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Russian View. Uniform Law Review, 1996. Issue 2, Vol. 1, p. 256.Zakon Ukraïni pro mizhnarodniy komertsiyniy arbitrazh, Polozhennya vid 24.02.1994 № 4002-XII, Redaktsiya vid 15.12.2017, ст. 28. Available in Ukranian. URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4002-12 (accessed 4 January 2018).Zakon Ukraïni pro mizhnarodniy komertsiyniy arbitrazh, Polozhennya vid 24.02.1994 № 4002-XII, Redaktsiya vid 15.12.2017, ст. 28. Available in Ukranian. URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4002-12 (accessed 4 January 2018).Ecuador’s Law of Arbitration (145/1997), art. 3. as cited in Varady.Ecuador’s Law of Arbitration (145/1997), art. 3. as cited in Varady.N. Blackaby, C. Partasides, A. Redfern, M. Hunter, above n 1, 229.N. Blackaby, C. Partasides, A. Redfern, M. Hunter, above n 1, 229.Bertrand E. Amiable composition: report of the ICC Frace working group. International Business Law Journal. Retrieved from Westlaw database. 2005.Bertrand E. Amiable composition: report of the ICC Frace working group. International Business Law Journal. Retrieved from Westlaw database. 2005.Blackaby N., Partasides C., Redfern A., Hunter M. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford University Press. 2009.Blackaby N., Partasides C., Redfern A., Hunter M. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford University Press. 2009.Jarvin S., Derains Y. Collection of ICC Arbitral Awards 1974-1985. ICC Publishing. 1990.Jarvin S., Derains Y. Collection of ICC Arbitral Awards 1974-1985. ICC Publishing. 1990.Komarov A.S. The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Russian View. Uniform Law Review, Issue 2, Vol. 1. 1996.Komarov A.S. The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Russian View. Uniform Law Review, Issue 2, Vol. 1. 1996.Varady T., Barcelo J.J.III, von Mehren A.T. International Commercial Arbitration: a transnational Perspective. 5th ed. American Casebook Series. West. 2012.Varady T., Barcelo J.J.III, von Mehren A.T. International Commercial Arbitration: a transnational Perspective. 5th ed. American Casebook Series. West. 2012.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.