<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kulawr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Kutafin Law Review</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Kutafin Law Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2713-0525</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-0533</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MSAL</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/2713-0533.2025.4.34.908-927</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">kulawr-728</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Concepts of Public Law Dogmatics during European Law Emergence.</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8950-4325</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Likhter</surname><given-names>P. L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Pavel L. Likhter, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Private and Public Law</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">lixter@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>Penza State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>908</fpage><lpage>927</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Likhter P.L., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Likhter P.L.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Likhter P.L.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/728">https://kulawr.msal.ru/jour/article/view/728</self-uri><abstract><p>The article is devoted to the impact of the idealistic concepts of the Antiquity made on the development of concepts of public law dogmatics during European law emergence. The current research is topical both for science (it helps to understand the conceptual framework as well as the way of thinking of those who specialize in public law) and application: the perception of the ideological grounds of public law dogma not only strengthens the relevant institutes of law regulating the public authority, but can also consolidate the legal community as the bearer of a relatively autonomous professional tradition important for the society. As in the early stages of its development dogmatics was mostly private law, the structure of public law in many ways was made of civil constructs and concepts. A new public law identity was shaped only at the end of the 19th century and the fundamental public law borrowings could be avoidable. The article attempts to find out the way the idealistic methodology influences the perception of public law pioneers of the main elements of legal reality, considering the dichotomy of idealistic and material, private and public, positive and natural law. Special attention is paid to the interpretation of the concept of “State” by J. Bluntschli, K. Gerber, O. Gierke and various conceptual approaches to the State (as a mechanism, system, legal entity, construct, etc.) in the theory of public law and order. It is noted that as compared to the representatives of a later developed legal positivism German lawyers trace down “ethical and spiritual contents” of law. The final part of the article is dedicated to the interpretation of legal dogmas as viewed in objective idealism. To solve the tasks set in the article, historical and legal, logical, hermeneutical, dialectical, formal and legal, sociological, theoretical and predictive as well as other methods of cognition are used.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>public law dogmatics</kwd><kwd>public law ontology</kwd><kwd>public law and order</kwd><kwd>legal positivism</kwd><kwd>Romano-Germanic law</kwd><kwd>Plato</kwd><kwd>Aristotle</kwd><kwd>J. Bluntschli</kwd><kwd>K. Gerber</kwd><kwd>O. Gierke</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aristotle, (1983). Politics. Works in 4 volumes. Asmus, V.F., Mikeladze, Z.N., Rozhansky, I.D., Dovatur, A.I. (eds). Moscow: Thought, vol. 4, pp. 375–545. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aristotle, (1983). Politics. Works in 4 volumes. Asmus, V.F., Mikeladze, Z.N., Rozhansky, I.D., Dovatur, A.I. (eds). Moscow: Thought, vol. 4, pp. 375–545. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Auɣarth, A., (1883). Die platonische Ideenlehre. Inaugural Dissertation. Marburg. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Auɣarth, A., (1883). Die platonische Ideenlehre. Inaugural Dissertation. Marburg. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berger, P. and Luckmann, T., (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. L.: Penguin Books. Bluntschli, J.C., (1868). Allgemeines Staatsrecht. Ertser Band. 4. AuÀ. München: J.G. Cotta-Buchhandlung. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berger, P. and Luckmann, T., (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. L.: Penguin Books. Bluntschli, J.C., (1868). Allgemeines Staatsrecht. Ertser Band. 4. AuÀ. München: J.G. Cotta-Buchhandlung. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cohen, H., (1902). System der Philosophie. T. 1: Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. Berlin. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cohen, H., (1902). System der Philosophie. T. 1: Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. Berlin. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gerber, C.F., (1880). Grundzüge des deutschen Staatsrechts [1865]. Dritte AuÀ. Leipzig: Verlag von Bernhard Tauchnitz. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gerber, C.F., (1880). Grundzüge des deutschen Staatsrechts [1865]. Dritte AuÀ. Leipzig: Verlag von Bernhard Tauchnitz. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gerber, C.F., (1852). Über öɣentliche Rechte. Tübingen: Laupp und Siebeck. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gerber, C.F., (1852). Über öɣentliche Rechte. Tübingen: Laupp und Siebeck. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gierke, O., (1874). Die Grundbegriɣe des Staatsrechts. Tübingen: Laupp. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gierke, O., (1874). Die Grundbegriɣe des Staatsrechts. Tübingen: Laupp. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gierke, O., (1895). Deutsches Privatrecht. Erster Band, Allgemeiner Teil und Personenrecht. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker &amp; Humblot. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gierke, O., (1895). Deutsches Privatrecht. Erster Band, Allgemeiner Teil und Personenrecht. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker &amp; Humblot. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hart, H.L.A., (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hart, H.L.A., (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hegel, G.W.F., (1812). Wissenschaft der Logik. Bd. 1,1. Nürnberg: Schrag. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hegel, G.W.F., (1812). Wissenschaft der Logik. Bd. 1,1. Nürnberg: Schrag. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hegel, G.W.F., (1990). Philosophy of Law. Moscow: Thought. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hegel, G.W.F., (1990). Philosophy of Law. Moscow: Thought. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Heidegger, M., (2001). Gesamtausgabe (herausgegeben von H. Tie tjen). II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1919–1944. Band 36/37. Sein und Wah rheit. 1. Die Grundfrage der Philosophie. 2. Vom Wesen der Wahrheit. Frankfurt, Moscow: Klostermann. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heidegger, M., (2001). Gesamtausgabe (herausgegeben von H. Tie tjen). II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1919–1944. Band 36/37. Sein und Wah rheit. 1. Die Grundfrage der Philosophie. 2. Vom Wesen der Wahrheit. Frankfurt, Moscow: Klostermann. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hertwig, O., (1922). Der Staat als Organismus: Gedanken zur Entwicklung der Menschheit. Jena: G. Fischer. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hertwig, O., (1922). Der Staat als Organismus: Gedanken zur Entwicklung der Menschheit. Jena: G. Fischer. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kelsen, H., (1934). Pure Theory of Law. Translated by Knight. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kelsen, H., (1934). Pure Theory of Law. Translated by Knight. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Muromtsev, S.A., (1884). Chto takoe dogma prava? Kritiko polemicheskaya zametka po povodu stat’i Gol’mstena “Neskol’ko myslej o pozitivizme v nauke prava” [What Is a Dogma of Law? A Critical Polemic Note on Holmsten’s Article “A Few Thoughts on Positivism in the Science of Law”]. Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. Legal Bulletin, issue 4, pp. 759–765; issue 5, pp. 231–240. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Muromtsev, S.A., (1884). Chto takoe dogma prava? Kritiko polemicheskaya zametka po povodu stat’i Gol’mstena “Neskol’ko myslej o pozitivizme v nauke prava” [What Is a Dogma of Law? A Critical Polemic Note on Holmsten’s Article “A Few Thoughts on Positivism in the Science of Law”]. Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. Legal Bulletin, issue 4, pp. 759–765; issue 5, pp. 231–240. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Plato, (1993). Parmenides. Collected works in 4 volumes. Los eva, A.F., Asmus, V.F., Takho-Godi, A.A. (eds). Moscow: Mysl Publ. Vol. 2, pp. 346–412. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Plato, (1993). Parmenides. Collected works in 4 volumes. Los eva, A.F., Asmus, V.F., Takho-Godi, A.A. (eds). Moscow: Mysl Publ. Vol. 2, pp. 346–412. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Plato, (1994). Republic. Collected works in 4 volumes. Loseva, A.F., Asmus, V.F., Takho-Godi, A.A. (eds). Moscow: Mysl Publ. Vol. 3, pp. 79– 421. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Plato, (1994). Republic. Collected works in 4 volumes. Loseva, A.F., Asmus, V.F., Takho-Godi, A.A. (eds). Moscow: Mysl Publ. Vol. 3, pp. 79– 421. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Savigny, F.C., (1840). Vom Beruf unsrer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. Available at: https://www.gleichsatz.de/b-u-t/can/rec/savigny_beruf.html [Accessed 01.02.2025]. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Savigny, F.C., (1840). Vom Beruf unsrer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. Available at: https://www.gleichsatz.de/b-u-t/can/rec/savigny_beruf.html [Accessed 01.02.2025]. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Spectorsky, E.V., (2006). The problem of social physics in the 17th century. Vol. II. St. Petersburg: Science. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Spectorsky, E.V., (2006). The problem of social physics in the 17th century. Vol. II. St. Petersburg: Science. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stahl, Fr.J., (1845). Das monarchische Princip. Heidelberg: Mohr. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stahl, Fr.J., (1845). Das monarchische Princip. Heidelberg: Mohr. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stammler, R., (1928). Lehrbuch der Rechtsphilosophie. de Gruyter, Berlin 1970. Verm. AuÀage. Unveränderter photomechanischer Nach druck: de Gruyter, Berlin, Leipzig. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stammler, R., (1928). Lehrbuch der Rechtsphilosophie. de Gruyter, Berlin 1970. Verm. AuÀage. Unveränderter photomechanischer Nach druck: de Gruyter, Berlin, Leipzig. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stolleis, M., (2014). Die Entstehung des Allgemeinen Teils des Verwaltungsrechts (1850–1900). Juridica International, 21, pp. 21–28. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stolleis, M., (2014). Die Entstehung des Allgemeinen Teils des Verwaltungsrechts (1850–1900). Juridica International, 21, pp. 21–28. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Windelband, W., (1901). Platon. 3. AuÀ. Stuttgart: Frommanns Verlag. (In German).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Windelband, W., (1901). Platon. 3. AuÀ. Stuttgart: Frommanns Verlag. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
