Kutafin Law Review

Advanced search

The Role of Small States in Integration Projects in the Eurasian Space: The Case of Armenia

Full Text:


The geopolitical interpretation of political processes taking place in the South Caucasus region ignores the possibility of an independent external policy of the smaller states that do not possess considerable military or economic power. Nevertheless, small states build their relations with Russia, the EU and other actors in accordance with the national political discourse that does not often correspond to the realist paradigm of international relations. The case of Armenia exemplifies membership in integration projects often described in academic literature as competing ones. As a consequence, the importance of closer research of internal political processes and factors that influence the decision to join one or another regional project increases. Cooperation with the EU, which has been strongly connected to partners’ commitment to democratic norms, human rights reforms and rule of law, was considered as an important part of their external policy by all the three South Caucasus countries. For the moment, the Eurasian Economic Union does not designate the normative component of cooperation with member countries. In this sense, the Eurasian project has still to define itself.

About the Author

A. S. Ayvazyan
Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Anna S. Ayvazyan - Research Associate

Mokhovaya St., 11-3, Moscow 125009


1. Arutyunyan, O.V., (2011). Armenia between Russia and EU. Science Journal of Volgograd State University, 1(19), pp. 160–163. (In Russ.)

2. Bailes, A., Thayer, B. and Thorhallsson, B., (2016). Alliance theory and alliance ‘Shelter’: the complexities of small state alliance behaviour. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 1(1), pp. 9–26. (In Eng.)

3. Delcour, L., (2018). Regionalism as You Like It? Armenia and the Eurasian Integration Process. The International Spectator, 53:3, pp. 55–69. (In Eng.)

4. Grigoryan, A., (2014). Armenia: Joining under the Gun. Available at: 1409GrandStrategy-Armenia.pdf [Accessed 25.05.2021]. (In Eng.)

5. Mammadov, F., Chiragov, F., (2018). A Small State’s Worldview. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 11, pp. 170–177. (In Eng.)

6. Martinus, K., Sigler, T., Iacopini, I. and Derudder, B., (2019). The brokerage role of small states and territories in global corporate networks. Growth and Change, 52 (1), pp. 1–25. (In Eng.)

7. Medico, N.D., (2014). A Black Knight in the Eastern Neighbourhood? Russia and EU Democracy Promotion in Armenia and Moldova. EU Diplomacy papers, College of Europe. (In Eng.)

8. Minasyan, S., (2015). Armenia balances. Ponars Evraziya. Analytical Notes, 377. (In Russ.)

9. Pavlova, E.B., Romanova, T.A., (2019). Debates on the theory of international relations: reconsidering interdisciplinarity. Polis. Political Studies, 2, pp. 161–172. (In Russ.)

10. Petrova, I., Ayvazyan, A., (2018). Perceptions of the EU’s Power in the Eastern Partnership Region: The Case of Armenia. European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 61–78.

11. Skriba, A.S., (2014). Small and middle states balancing. International Processes, 12(4), pp. 88–100. (In Russ.)

12. Umudov, A., (2019). Europeanization of Azerbaijan: Assessment of Normative Principles and Pragmatic Cooperation. In: Leiße, O. (eds). Politik und Gesellschaft im Kaukasus. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 53– 78. (In Germ.)


For citation:

Ayvazyan A.S. The Role of Small States in Integration Projects in the Eurasian Space: The Case of Armenia. Kutafin Law Review. 2021;8(2):270-288.

Views: 174

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2713-0525 (Print)
ISSN 2713-0533 (Online)