Kutafin Law Review

Advanced search

European Artificial Intelligence Act: Should Russia Implement the Same?

Full Text:


The proposal for a European Union Regulation establishing harmonized rules for artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) is under consideration. The structure and features of the proposal of this regulatory legal act of the integrational organization are analyzed. EU AI Act scope is analyzed and shown as wider than the current Russian one. The act will contain harmonized rules for placing into market, operation and use of AI systems; bans on certain artificial intelligence methods; special requirements for AI systems with high level of risk and obligations of operators of such systems, harmonized transparency rules for AI systems designed for interaction with individuals, emotion recognition systems and biometric categorization systems, AI systems used to creating or managing images, audio or video content; market surveillance and supervision rules. The provisions of the Act, the features of the proposed institutions and norms, including extraterritoriality (as for GDPR before that raised many questions), risk-oriented approach (which is based both on self-certification and definite criteria for high-risk systems), object, scope, definitions are considered. The possible key concerns based on case-law to undermine possible discrimination are expressed. The author expresses conclusions about the advisability of (non) application of these institutions or rules in Russia.

About the Author

A. Zh. Stepanyan
Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Armen Zh. Stepanyan, Cand. Sci. (Law), Task Force Co-Chairman

10 build. 2 Presnenskaya naberezhnaya, Moscow 125039


1. Broadbent, M., (2021). What’s Ahead for a Cooperative Regulatory Agenda on Artificial Intelligence? Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Available at: [Accessed 14.05.2021].

2. Datatilsynet, (2020). Regulatory Sandbox. Available at: [Accessed 14.05.2021].

3. Dmitrik, N.A., (2020). History, essence and prospects of personal data protection. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil Law Review], 20(3), pp. 43–82, doi: 10.24031/1992-2043-2020-20-3-43-82 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. ICO. Information Commissioner’s Office, (2021). Regulatory Sandbox. Available at: [Accessed 14.05.2021].

5. Lawrence, C. and Cordey, S., (2020). The Case for Increased Transatlantic Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, August 2020. Available at: [Accessed 14.05.2021].

6. Mazzini, G., (2019). A System of Governance for Artificial Intelligence through the Lens of Emerging Intersections between AI and EU Law. In: A. De Franceschi — R. Schulze (eds.), Digital Revolution — New challenges for Law. Available at: [Accessed 14.05.2021].

7. Sangwoo, L., (2018). A Study on the Extraterritorial Application of the General Data Protection Regulation with a Focus on Computing. 539 p. Available at: [Accessed 14.05.2021].

8. Stepanyan, A.Zh., (2019). Problems of Regulation of Unmanned Vehicles. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 4, pp. 169–174, doi: (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

9. Stepanyan, A.Zh., (2020). Digital Regulation: Digitalization or Humanization? Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 4, pp. 114–120, doi: (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. and Russell, C., (2021). Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI. Computer Law and Security Review, 41, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105567.

For citation:

Stepanyan A.Z. European Artificial Intelligence Act: Should Russia Implement the Same? Kutafin Law Review. 2021;8(3):403-422.

Views: 30

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2713-0525 (Print)
ISSN 2713-0533 (Online)