Preview

Kutafin Law Review

Advanced search

The Legal and Institutional Foundations of Silicon Valley’s Technological Innovation: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review

https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2021.3.17.472-484

Full Text:

Abstract

This article reviews interdisciplinary literature to explain how state legislation and the practice of law in California influenced the success of Silicon Valley in creating a startup business culture involving the commercialization of technologies built on venture capital finance. Scholarship has identified four major factors in the rise of Silicon Valley: business culture, symbiotic institutional relations with research universities, California contract and employment law, and Silicon Valley law firm culture. Both law and institutional support have been central to the commercialization of scientific knowledge that is the hallmark of Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley companies have remained leaders in technological innovation for over sixty years, encompassing various technologies from semiconductors to personal computers to the Internet. This entrepreneurial approach to technology continues to this day as exemplified by the successful DoorDash and Airbnb IPOs launched in 2020. The paradigmatic Silicon Valley technology company consists of a small group of entrepreneurs building a start-up technology company funded by a venture capital fund. The venture capitalists (VC) maintain hands-on management of the company and receive seats on the board of director and preferred stock rights. If the business plan is successful, the company offers shares to the public through an initial public offering (IPO), or arranges additional funding from another VC fund. This Silicon Valley model is characterized by a tolerance for failure and high labor mobility. Technology company employees have the freedom to leave established companies to start their own ventures.

About the Author

S. D. Stone
Stanford Law School
United States

Sergio D. Stone, Deputy Director, Robert Crown Law Library

559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, CA 94305



References

1. Aran, Y., (2018). Beyond Covenants Not to Compete: Equilibrium in High-Tech Startup Labor Markets. Stanford Law Review, 70, pp. 1235–1294. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3111045 [Accessed 01.08.2021].

2. Barnett, J.M. and Sichelman, T., (2020). The Case for Noncompetes. University of Chicago Law Review, 87, pp. 953–1049. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3516397 [Accessed 01.08.2021].

3. Bernstein, L., (1995). The Silicon Valley Lawyer as Transaction Cost Engineer? University of Oregon Law Review, 74, pp. 239–255.

4. Casper, S., (2007). Creating Silicon Valley in Europe: Public Policy Towards New Technology Industries. Oxford University Press.

5. Coyle, J.F. and Green, J.M., (2017). Startup Lawyering 2.0. North Carolina Law Review. 95(5), art. 3.31 pp. 1403–1432. Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol95/iss5/3 [Accessed 01.08.2021].

6. Feldman, Y., (2003). Experimental Approach to the Study of Normative Failures: Divulging of Trade Secrets by Silicon Valley Employees. University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, pp. 105–180. Available at: http://illinoisjltp.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/feldman.pdf [Accessed 01.08.2021].

7. Gilson, R.J., (1984). Value Creation by Business Lawyers: Legal Skills and Asset Pricing. Yale Law Journal, 94, pp. 239–313. Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1956&context=faculty_scholarship [Accessed 01.08.2021].

8. Gilson, R.J., (1999). The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete. New York University Law Review, 74(3), pp. 575–629. Available at: https://www.nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-74-number-3/the-legal-infrastructure-of-high-technology-industrial-districts-silicon-valley-route-128-and-covenants-not-to-compete/ [Accessed 01.08.2021].

9. Gomulkiewicz, R.W., (2015). Leaky Covenants-Not-to-Compete as the Legal Infrastructure for Innovation. University of California, Davis, Law Review, 49(1), pp. 251–304. Available at: https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/49/1/Articles/49-1_Gomulkiewicz.pdf [Accessed 01.08.2021].

10. Haymond, C. and Burch, J.C., (1874). Civil Code of the State of California. A.L. Bancroft & Co.

11. Hyde, A., (2003). Working in Silicon Valley: Economic and Legal Analysis of a High-Velocity Labor Market. M. E. Sharpe.

12. Ibrahim, D.M., (2010). Financing the Next Silicon Valley. Washington University Law Review, 87(4), pp. 717–762. Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1094&context=law_lawreview [Accessed 01.08.2021].

13. Kenney, M., (2000). Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford University Press.

14. Lee, N., (2016). Techtopus: A Critical Analysis of the Silicon Valley Wage-Fixing Scandal. The Manchester Review of Law, Crime & Ethics, 5, pp. 160–178. Available at: http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/schools/law/main/research/student-review/student-law-reviewvol5-final-web.pdf [Accessed 01.08.2021].

15. Rao, A. and Scaruffi, P., (2011). A History of Silicon Valley: the Greatest Creation of Wealth in the history of the Planet: a Moral Tale. Omniware Group.

16. Saxenian, A.L., (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press.

17. Stanford Research Institute. 70 Years of SRI Innovation. Available at: https://www.sri.com/blog-archive/70-years-of-sriinnovation [Accessed 01.08.2021].

18. Starr, E., (2019). Consider This: Training, Wages, and the Enforceability of Covenants Not To Compete. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 72, pp. 783–817. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793919826060 [Accessed 01.08.2021].

19. Streitfeld, A., (2014). Tech Giants Settle Antitrust Hiring Suit. New York Times. April 24. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/25/technology/settlement-silicon-valley-antitrust-case.html [Accessed 01.08.2021].

20. Suchman, M.C. and Cahill, M.L., (1996). The Hired Gun as Facilitator: Lawyers and the Suppression of Business Disputes in Silicon Valley. Law & Social Inquiry, 21(3), pp. 679–712, doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.1996.tb00093.x.

21. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Brochure, (2019). Available at: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/the-court/June_2019_Jurisdiction.pdf [Accessed 01.08.2021].

22. Weiss, D.M., (2011). Entrepreneurial Employees. SSRN Working Paper. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1868646 [Accessed 01.08.2021].

23. Wood, J., (2000). A Comparison of the Enforceability of Covenants Not to Compete and Recent Economic Histories of Four High Technology Regions. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 5(3), p. 14, p. 25 para. 28. Available at: https://www.vjolt.org/volume-5 [Accessed 01.08.2021].


For citation:


Stone S.D. The Legal and Institutional Foundations of Silicon Valley’s Technological Innovation: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review. Kutafin Law Review. 2021;8(3):472-484. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2021.3.17.472-484

Views: 53


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-0525 (Print)
ISSN 2713-0533 (Online)