Analysis of the OECD a nd the United Nations’ Approaches to Developing an International Consensus on Reforming the Rules of Taxation of Digital Services
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0525.2022.3.21.564-585
Abstract
The article deals with the problems arising in connection with the taxation of the digital economy, using the example of the proposals of the OECD and the EU on the introduction of a tax on digital services, as well as unilateral measures of national states in the area of taxation of the digital economy (on the example of the French digital tax). The main question for the study is whether unilateral measures imposing taxes on digital services represent a suitable solution to the tax problems that arise in connection with digitalization. Based on the analysis of current legislation and jurisprudence, the author concludes that provisions of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation on VAT and income tax do not allow to fully collect taxes on income of corporate groups that use digital business models when providing services related to Russian users. At the same time, Russian organizations that conduct similar activities face full tax burden, which allows us to conclude that Russian companies are discriminated against foreign companies. In this regard, it is advisable to consider the issue of taxation in Russia as the part of the profits extracted by foreign companies in the Russian market.
Keywords
About the Author
K. A. PonomarevaRussian Federation
Karina A. Ponomareva, Dr. Sci. (Law), Leading Researcher, Tax Policy Center; Professor, Department for State and Municipal Law, Dostoevsky Omsk State University
3, b. 2 Nastasyinsky pereulok, Moscow 127006
100/1 ulitsa 50 Let Profsoyuzov, Omsk 644077
References
1. Ayush T., Nishant S., Shefali M., and Stella J., (2021). Taxation of Digitalized Economy: Analysing the United Nations Article 12B Solution, New Delhi, The Dialogue and Economic Laws Practice. Available at: https://elplaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Dialogue-Economic-Laws-Practice-Taxation-of-Digitalized-Economy.pdf [Accessed 21.05.2022].
2. Berberov, A.B. and Milogolov, N.S., (2018). Assessment of the Scope of Tax Base Erosion in Russia. Financial Journal [Finansovyy zhurnal], 47 (6), pp. 47–58.
3. Chand, V. and Vilaseca, P., (2021). The UN Proposal on Automated Digital Services: Is It in the Interest of Developing Countries? Available at: http://kluwertaxblog.com/2021/03/05/theun-proposal-on-automated-digital-services-is-it-in-the-interest-ofdeveloping-countries/ [Accessed 21.05.2022].
4. Lyutova, O.I., (2021). Relevant issues of taxation of IT field in the era of digitalization and globalization. Law and society in the context of globalization: development prospects. In: Collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, pp. 267–271. (In Russ.).
5. Milogolov, N.S. and Berberov, A.B., (2021). Russia in global digital tax reform: together or apart? Journal of Siberian Federal University Humanities and Social Sciences, 14(11), pp. 1731–1745.
6. Milogolov, N.S. and Ponomareva, K.A., (2021). International Cooperation of Tax Administrations in Taxing Digital Business Models: Myth or Reality? Nalogi, 3, pp. 29–31. (In Russ.).
7. Olkhovik, V.V., Lyutova, O.I., and Juchnevicius, E., (2022). Economic Growth Models and FDI in the CIS Countries During the Period of Digitalization. Financial Journal, 14 (2), pp. 73–90. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2022-2-73-90.
8. Ponomareva, K., (2019). Comparison of Proposals to Adjust the Permanent Establishment Concept to the Digital Economy. Bulletin of International Taxation, 73 (11), pp. 581–589.
9. Ponomareva, K.A., (2021). Digital services taxes: the international experience and relevance for the Russian Federation. Kutafin Law Review, 8(2), pp. 314–330. https://doi.org/10.17803/23135395.2021.2.16.314-330.
Review
For citations:
Ponomareva K.A. Analysis of the OECD a nd the United Nations’ Approaches to Developing an International Consensus on Reforming the Rules of Taxation of Digital Services. Kutafin Law Review. 2022;9(3):564-585. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0525.2022.3.21.564-585