Preview

Kutafin Law Review

Advanced search

Russian Anti-Offshore Policy: Current Regulation and Perspectives

https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.1.23.003-040

Abstract

The paper outlines the regulatory landscape of an anti-offshore policy in Russia. In the first part of this paper, the author gives an overview of effective regulations against offshore businesses that Russia has adopted in the past decade. The CFC rules were developed and subsequently passed because of Russia’s participation in the BEPS project. They are of the highest importance for the implementation of the anti-offshore policy. Other measures include transfer-pricing rules, registers of beneficial owners, exchange of financial information and revision of double tax treaties with Cyprus, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Switzerland. Sanctions imposed by the EU, the USA, the UK and their allies against Russia, Russian individuals and companies in 2022 and counter-measures against Western countries and their residents introduced by Russian authorities also stimulate deoffshorization of the Russian economy. They have limited the free movement of capital between offshore holding companies and their Russian subsidiaries and, consequently, have contributed to the isolation of the Russian economy from the rest of the world, including its offshore infrastructure. The second part of the paper deals with the proposals for the Russian anti-offshore policy. The author shares his ideas on how to make the policy for deoffshorization of the Russian economy more effective. A few of these anti-offshore actions have already been implemented in draft laws and are currently being considered in the Russian Parliament. All of the measures that are being considered would result in unfavourable tax implications and possible damage to the reputations of those Russian individuals and organizations who still use offshore companies and trusts for the purposes of minimizing taxation and maintaining anonymity. The most important action proposed by the author for the implementation of the anti-offshore policy is the forced deoffshorization of strategic enterprises. Passing the relevant law would entail fundamental changes to the Russian business environment and result in the restoration of economic sovereignty over the Russian economy.

About the Author

V. A. Kanashevskiy
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Kanashevskiy, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of Private International Law

9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Str., Moscow 125993



References

1. Adkisson, J. and Riser, Ch., (2004). Asset Protection: Concepts and Strategies for Protecting Your Wealth. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.

2. Arakelov, S.A., (2017). Developing the concept of beneficial ownership for income: approaches of federal tax service considering relevant court decisions. Zakon, 5, pp. 45–56. (In Russ.).

3. Cope, Ch. and Jain, P., (2015). Taxation of Indirect Share Transfers: Recent Developments in India and Related Policy Considerations. Tax Management International Journal, 44, p. 12. Available at: https://www.copetax.com/siteFiles/6961/Taxation%20by%20India%20of%20Indirect%20Share%2)0Transfers.pdf [Accessed 15.06.2022].

4. Cruise, S. and Mandl, C., (2022). Exclusive Russian companies, banks could reap windfall from depositary receipt delisting. Reuters, 15 April 2022. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/business/exclusive-russian-companies-banks-could-reap-windfall-depositary-receipt-2022-04-14/ [Accessed 15.06.2022].

5. Deneault, A., (2011). Offshore. Tax Havens and the Rule of Global Crime. New York: New Press.

6. Gidirim, V., (2016). The Fundamentals of International Corporate Taxation. Moscow: Avtor Publ. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311651777_Osnovy_mezdunarodnogo_korporativnogo_nalogooblozenia_Fundamentals_of_International_Corporate_Taxation#fullTextFileContent [Accessed 15.06.2022]. (In Russ.).

7. Katasonov, V., (2016). World Cabala. Robbery. Moscow: Alistorus Publ. (In Russ.).

8. Khachaturov, A., (2017). Billions have Gone Abroad. Novaya gazeta, 8 June 2017. Available at: https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2017/06/08/72742-oshibka-patriota [Accessed 25.11.2020]. (In Russ.).

9. Kheyfets, B., (2008). Offshore Jurisdictions in Global and National Economy. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ. (In Russ.).

10. Krasnobaeva, A. and Blagova, R., (2017). Indirect Sale of Immovable Property: The Development of the Taxation Rules. Prakticheskoe nalogovoe planirovanie [Practical tax planning], Dec. 12. Available at: https://www.audit-it.ru/articles/account/court/a55/940546.html [Accessed 05.01.2021]. (In Russ.).

11. Kudrin, S., (2022). 15 Companies want to Become Residents of the SAR in Russkiy Island. Agentstvo Bizness Novostey, 8 June 2022. Available at: https://abnews.ru/2022/6/8/15-kompanij-zhelayut-stat-rezidentami-sar-na-ostrove-russkij [Accessed 15.06.2022]. (In Russ.).

12. Levinskiy, A., (2022). What airlines have gained from registering aircraft in Russia. Forbes, 22 March 2022. Available at: https://www.forbes.ru/biznes/459283-cto-vyigrali-aviakompanii-ot-registracii-samoletov-v-Rossii [Accessed 13.06.2022]. (In Russ.).

13. Magnusson, M., (2014). Offshore Companies: How to Register Tax-Free Companies in High-Tax Countries. York: Opus Operis.

14. Schwab, K. and Malleret, T., (2020). Covid-19: The Great Reset. Forum Publishing. Available at: http://reparti.free.fr/schwab2020.pdf [Accessed 03.02.2020]. (In Russ.).

15. Wilson, P., (2018). BRICS and International Tax Law Ch. 5. Wolters Kluwer.


Review

For citations:


Kanashevskiy V.A. Russian Anti-Offshore Policy: Current Regulation and Perspectives. Kutafin Law Review. 2023;10(1):3-40. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.1.23.003-040

Views: 526


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-0525 (Print)
ISSN 2713-0533 (Online)