Irreversible Choices and Future Generations’ Rights
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.1.23.110-136
Abstract
The article revolves around the question whether, given some very “fundamental threats” to future generations’ living, their very conditions of survival can be construed as rights. The issue has to tackle the problem of the non-existence of the presumptive holders of such a right, as well as with the problem of their (non-)identity. The article shows the reasons for separating what we owe to future persons under the challenge of some fundamental threats for humanity from our will to hand down our cultural and ethical ideas of the good information and eventually from paternalistic or selfish imposition upon future generations of our irreversible choices. The framework refers essentially to a conceptual grammar of justice. Moreover, it is suggested to articulate rights through the lens of “disposability” and “non-disposability” principles.
About the Author
G. Palombella
Institute of Law, Politics and Development
Italy
Italy
Gianluigi Palombella, PhD (Law), Professor of Applied Legal Theory, Coordinator of the PhD in Law and Director of Center for Interlegality Research (CIR) Scuola Sant’Anna
36 Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 56127 Pisa
References
1. Alexy, R., (2002). A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Translated by J. Rivers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Barry, B., (1999). Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice, in A. Dobson (ed.). Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bazelon, C. and Smetters, K., (2001). Discounting in the Long Term. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 35(1), pp. 277– 292, doi: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2312&context=llr.
4. Brock, D.W., (1995). The Non-identity Problem and Genetic Harms: The case of Wrongful Handicaps. Bioethics, 9, pp. 269–275, doi: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/527933.
5. Bruhl, A.-A.P., (2002). Justice unconceived: how posteriority has rights. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 14, pp. 393–439, doi: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7328.
6. Buchanan, A., et al., (2001). Reproductive Freedom and the Prevention of Harm, in From Chance to Choice: Genetics &Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 204–257, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806940.007.
7. Cerutti, F., (2007). Global Challenges for Leviathan: a political philosophy of nuclear weapons and global warming. Lanham and London: Lexington Books.
8. Dawkins, R., (1989). The selfish gene. II. Oxford — New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Dawkins, R., (1995). River out of Eden: a darwinian view of life. London: Basic Books.
10. Diamond, J., (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: Norton&C.
11. Dworkin, G., (1972). Paternalism. The Monist, 56(1), pp. 64–84, doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197256119.
12. Engelhardt, H.T., (1996). The Foundations of Bioethics. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Epstein, R., (1992). Justice across the generations, in P. Laslett and J.S. Fishkin (eds). Justice between age groups and generations. New Haven. Pp. 84–106.
14. Falk, R.A., (2000). Human Rights Horizons: The Pursuit of Justice in a Globalizing World. New York — London: Routledge.
15. Habermas, J., (2003). The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Hart, H.L.A., (1982). Legal Rights, in Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254683.003.0008.
17. Hohfeld, W.N., (1917). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. The Yale Law Journal, 26(8), pp. 710–770, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/786270.
18. Ignatieff, M., (2001). Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Kant, I., (2003). Metaphysical first principles of the doctrine of right, in M.J. Gregor (ed.). The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Kelsen, H., (1961). General Theory of Law and State. Translated by A. Wedberg. New York: Russel&Russel.
21. MacCormick, N., (1976). Children’s Rights: a test case for theories of right. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 62(3), pp. 305–317. Reprinted in: MacCormick, N., (1982). Legal Rights and Social Democracy. Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22. MacCormick, N., (1984). Taking the “Rights Thesis” Seriously, in Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. Markie, P.J., (2005). Nonidentity, wrongful conception and harmless wrongs. Ratio, 18(3), pp. 290–305, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00291.x.
24. Mill, J.S., (1962). On Liberty, in M. Warnock (ed.). Utilitarianism and On Liberty. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
25. O’Neill, O., (1996). Towards Justice and Virtue: a constructive account of practical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Palombella, G., (2002). L’autorità dei diritti [The Authority of Rights]. Bari: Laterza. (In Italian).
26. Parfit, D., (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Pettit, P., (1997). Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Pettit, P., (2009). Law and Liberty. In: S. Besson and J.L. Marti (eds). Legal Republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 39–60.
29. Pontara, G., (1995). Etica e generazioni future [Ethics and Future Generations]. Bari: Laterza. (In Italian).
30. Portney, P.R. and Weyant, J.P. (eds), (1999). Discounting and Intergenerational Equity. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
31. Rawls, J., (1982). The Basic Liberties and Their Priorities. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press (Tanners Lectures on Human Values).
32. Rawls, J., (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
33. Rawls, J., (1999). A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Rawls, J., (2001). Justice as Fairness: a Restatement. Edited by E. Kelly. Cambridge, Massachusetts — London, England: Harvard University Press.
35. Raz, J., (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Raz, J., (1995). Legal Rights, in Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37. Riordan, P., (2016). Global Ethics and Global Common Goods. Bloomsbury Publishing.
38. Roberts, M.A., (1998). Child versus Childmaker: Future Persons and Present Duties in Ethics and the Law. Lanham: Rownman & Littlefield Publ.
39. Sato, S., (2002). Sustainable development and the selfish gene: a rational paradigm for achieving intergenerational equity. New York University Environmental Law Journal, 503(11), pp. 503–530.
40. Seto, T.P., (2001). Intergenerational decision making: an evolutionary perspective. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 35(1), pp. 235–276. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol35/iss1/6.
41. Sidgwick, H., (1907). The Methods of Ethics. New York: Macmillan and Co, Ltd.
42. Sikora, R.I. and Barry, B. (eds) (1978). Obligations to Future Generations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
43. Sunstein, C.R., (2006). Irreversible and Catastrophic. Cornell Law Review, 91(4), pp. 841–898. Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol91/iss4/2/.
44. Tooley, M., (1984). Abortion and Infanticide. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Wagner, G., (1993). Rudolph von Jherings Theorie des subjektiven Rechts und der berechtigenden Reflexwirkungen, Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 193(vol. 4), pp. 319–347.
46. Waldron, J., (1984). Are there any Natural Rights? In: Theories of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Oxford Readings in Philosophy). Warren, M.A., (1978). Do potential people have moral rights? in R.I. Sikora and B. Barry (eds). Obligations to Future Generations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 14–30.
47. Wood, J.C., (1995). Intergenerational equity and climate change. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 293. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gintenlr8&div=18&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals.
48. Woodward, J., (1986). The Non-Identity Problem. Ethics, 96(4), pp. 804–831, doi: http://0-www.jstor.org.serlib0.essex.ac.uk/stable/2381100.
49. Woodward, J., (1987). Reply to Parfit. Ethics, 97(4), pp. 800–816, doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2381210.
50. Zanuso, F., (2005). Neminem Laedere. Verità e persuasione nel dibattito bio-giuridico [Neminem Laedere. Truth and persuasion in the bio-juridical debate]. Padova: CEDAM. (In Italian).
Review
For citations:
Palombella G. Irreversible Choices and Future Generations’ Rights. Kutafin Law Review. 2023;10(1):110-136. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.1.23.110-136
Views:
276
Email this article 
