Moral Foundations of Legal Communication
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.2.25.475-494
Abstract
The article is founded on the position that social communication as an evolutionary option for the development of communication of all living beings must also include legal communication. In this existential context, legal communication is not reduced only to the transfer of symbolic (textual) information determining the behavior of subjects of law. It is also considered as a vital option for adapting to the environment, which allows both individuals and society to survive, develop and self-realize. Legal communication involves not just cooperation and interaction between legal subjects, but also the observance of the necessary conditions for the implicit and explicit goals of legal communication to be achieved and realized. Implicit (universal, transcendental, evolutionarily necessary) goals are reflected at the sociobiological level in the reciprocal altruism (ego-altruism) of communicants, at the philosophical (rational) level — in the principle of mutual legal and moral recognition, at the religious level — in the commandment “love your neighbor as yourself.” The authors reveal the connection between these concepts and the concept of communication by J. Habermas and the principle of mutual recognition by A. Honneth, on the one hand, and the idea of intuitive law by L.I. Petrażycki and the ideal of “free all-unity” by P.I. Novgorodtsev, on the other hand. It is shown that the findings of these scholars lie at the heart of the communicative theory of law and are supported by neuroscience data. According to the position put forward in this research, the rejection of mutual recognition inevitably entails the assertion of parochial altruism, the ideology of tribalism, the ideological justification of authoritarianism, violence as a universal political method, the neglect of human rights and, as a result, the deformation and destruction of legal communication.
About the Authors
A. V. Polyakov
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Theory and
History of State and Law
I. I. Osvetimskaya
National Research University Higher School of
Economics (St. Petersburg); St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of
Theory and History of Law and State; Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law
References
1. Bauer, J., (2006). Prinzip Menschlichkeit: Warum wir von Natur aus kooperieren [Humanity principle: why we cooperate by nature]. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe Verlag GmbH. (In Germ.).
2. Chestnov, I.L., (2002). Law Understanding in the Post-Modern Era. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University of Foreign Economic Relations Publ. (In Russ.).
3. Chestnov, I.L., (2012). Postclassical Theory of Law. St. Petersburg: Alef-Press Publ. (In Russ.).
4. Darwin, C., (2012). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Scotts Valley, California: Create Space Independent Publ. Platform.
5. Dubynin, V., (2022). The Brain and Its Needs: From Nutrition to Recognition. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction Publ. (In Russ.).
6. Günther, K., (2009). Menschenrechte zwischen Staaten und Dritten: Vom vertikalen zum horizontalen Verständnis der Menschenrechte [Human rights between states and third parties: From the vertical to the horizontal understanding of human rights]. In: Deitelhoff, N. and Steffek, J., (eds). Was bleibt vom Staat? Demokratie, Recht und Verfassung im globalen Zeitalter [What remains of the state? Democracy, law and constitution in the global age]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. (In Germ.).
7. Habermas, J., (2003). The Future of Human Nature. Toward Liberal Eugenics? Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Habermas, J., (2010). The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights. Metaphilosophy, 41 (4), pp. 464– 480, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01648.x.
9. Haidt, J., (2006). The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. New York: Basic Books.
10. Hauser, M.D., (2007). Moral Minds: The Nature of Right and Wrong. New York: Ecco.
11. Höffe, O., (1993). Moral als Preis [Morality as a price]. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag. (In Germ.).
12. Honneth, A., (1995). The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflict. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Honneth, A., (2001). Invisibility: On the Epistemology of “Recognition.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 75(1), pp. 111–126, doi: 10.1111/1467-8349.00081.
14. Honneth, A., (2010). Von der Begierde zur Anerkennung. Hegels Begründung von Selbstbewusstse [From desire to recognition. Hegel’s justification of self-consciousness]. In: Honneth, A. Das Ich im Wir [The I in the We]. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag. Pp. 15–32. (In Germ.).
15. Jung, C.G., (1981). Archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
16. Kahneman, D., (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
17. Klyucharev, V.A., Schmids, A., and Shestakova, A.N., (2011). Neuroeconomics: Neurobiology of Decision-Making. Experimental Psychology, 4 (2), pp. 14–35. (In Russ.).
18. Knyazeva, E.N., (2012). Evolutionary Epistemology in Retrospect and Perspective. In: Knyazeva, E.N., (ed.). Evolutionary Epistemology. Anthology. Moscow: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives. (In Russ.). Lorenz, K., (1966). On Aggression. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. Malman, M., (2016). Mind and Rights: Neurology, Philosophy and Foundations of Legal Justice. Pravovedenie, 5, pp. 6–67. (In Russ.).
19. Markov, A.V., (2011). Monkeys, Neurons and the Soul. Moscow: Corpus-AST Publ. (In Russ.).
20. Merkulov, I.P., (ed.), (2000). Evolution. Language. Cognition. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ. (In Russ.).
21. Mikhail, J., (2007). Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence and the Future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), pp. 143–152, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007.
22. Mikhail, J., (2011). Elements of Moral Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Mikhail, J., (2012). Moral Grammar and Human Rights: Some Reflections on Cognitive Science and Enlightenment Rationalism. In: Goodman, R., Jinks, D., Woods, A.K., (eds). Understanding Social Action, Promoting Human Rights. Oxford University Press. Pp. 160– 202.
24. Mikhailov, I.A., (2012). “The Struggle for Recognition.” The Idea of Recognition in the Social and Critical Theory of A. Honneth. In: Blauberg, I.I., (ed.). The Western Philosophy in the Late XXth — Early XXIst Century. Ideas. Problems. Trends. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.).
25. Milgram, S., (1974). Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper and Row.
26. Novgorodtsev, P.I., (1991). On the Social Ideal. Moscow: Pressa Publ. (In Russ.).
27. Osvetimskaya, I.I., (2021). Deformations of Communication between State Power and Society in Russia. The Ideology and Politics Journal, 2(18), pp. 92–312. (In Russ.).
28. Petrażycki, L.I., (1913). On the Social Ideal and the Revival of Natural Law. Moscow: G. Lissner and D. Sobko Print. House. (In Russ.).
29. Petrażycki, L.I., (2000). Theory of Law and State in Relation to the Theory of Morals. St. Petersburg: Lan’ Publ. (In Russ.).
30. Polyakov, A.V., (2014). Communicative Legal Understanding: Selected Works. St. Petersburg: Alef-Press. (In Russ.).
31. Polyakov, A.V., (2021). The Principle of Mutual Legal Recognition: Russian Philosophical and Legal Tradition and Communicative Approach to Law. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of Russian Academy of Sciences, 16 (6), pp. 39–101. (In Russ.).
32. Polyakov, A.V., (2022). Justice as Adherence to the Principles of Law. In: Lukovskaya, D.I., Malysheva, N.I., Yudina, M.I. (eds). Is Justice Alive in Law? Collective monograph. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya Publ. Pp. 40–82. (In Russ.).
33. Vaal, de F., (2014). The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism among the Primates. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
34. Van den Brink, B., (2014). The Paradigm of Recognition in Social Philosophy. Izvestia Ural Federal University. Social Sciences, 2(128), pp. 5–15. (In Russ.).
35. Wilson, E., (2015). The Meaning of Human Existence. New York: Boni & Liveright.
Review
For citations:
Polyakov A.V., Osvetimskaya I.I. Moral Foundations of Legal Communication. Kutafin Law Review. 2023;10(3):475-494. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.2.25.475-494
Views:
388
Email this article 
