Legal Concept of a State Aircraft is “Up in the Air”: Problems of a Definition
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.1.27.022-049
Abstract
Due to the technological development the scope of State aircraft application has significantly expanded. As a result there is a need to study the current international legal approach to the definition of “State aircraft” with respect to its applicability to existing relations. Furthermore, the distinction between state and civil aviation is a critical issue in determining the scope of international air law instruments. The authors analyze different approaches to the definition of “State aircraft” at the universal, regional and bilateral level. The study has revealed that there is no holistic understanding of the concept of “state aircraft” in current international law, which has a negative impact on the international legal regulation. The authors conclude that it is advisable to revise the definition of “state aircraft” at the universal level, which should serve as an impetus for further unification of the legal regulation. The authors propose to expand t his legal category beyond the provisions of the 1944 Chicago Convention. This paper argues that it would be in the interests of modern aviation and would address existing and potential legal problems.
About the Authors
D. V. Ivanov
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry V. Ivanov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, International Law Department
Moscow
Scopus Author ID: 57217108250
Researcher ID: U-5871-2017
V. G. Donakanian
Monastyrsky, Zyuba, Stepanov & Partners
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav G. Donakanian, Associate
Moscow
Scopus Author ID: 57222759552
References
1. Abeyratne, R., (2010). Aviation Security Law. Heidelberg: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-11703-9.
2. Abeyratne, R., (2013). Legal Issues of the Snowden Case; State Aircraft vs Civil Aircraft. German Journal of Air and Space Law, 62(4), pp. 648–657.
3. Abeyratne, R., (2019). Legal Priorities in Air Transport. Cham, Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-18391-2_1.
4. Ash, W., (1987). 1982 Convention of the Law of the Sea-Its Impact on Air Law. Air Force Law Review, 26, pp. 35–82.
5. Batalov, Ǩ.Ǩ., (2020). The Sources of International Air Law: Current Issues of Theory and Practice. Moscow Journal of International Law, 3, pp. 64–90, doi: 10.24833/0869-0049-2020-3-64-90. (In Russ.).
6. Blake, D.P. and Henderson, I.S., (2011). Military Use of Civil-Registered Aircraft. Annals of Air and Space Law, 36, pp. 133–168.
7. Bordunov, V.D., Kotov, A.I. and Maleev, Y.N., (1988). Legal Regulation of International Flights of Civil Aircraft. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.).
8. Cluxton, D., (2020). The Chicago Convention 1944 in an UNCLOS 1982 World: Maritime Zones, Continental Shelves, Artificial Islands, and Some Other Issues. University of La Verne Law Review, 41(2), pp. 137– 197.
9. Cooper, J.C., (1946). Air Power and the Coming Peace Treaties. Foreign Affairs, 24(3), pp. 441–452, doi: 10.2307/20029981.
10. De Leon, P.M., (2017). Introduction to Air Law, 10th ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
11. De Oliveira, R., (2016). The Distinction between Civil and State Aircraft: Does the Current Legal Framework Provide Suffcient Clarity of Law with Regard to Civil and State Aircraft in Relation to Aviation Practicalities? Air and Space Law, 41 (4/5), pp. 329–343, doi: 10.54648/ aila2016025.
12. De Oliveira, R., (2019). The Delineation between Civil Aircraft and State Aircraft: a Move into the Aviation World of Tomorrow after 75 Years of Uncertainty. In: de Leon, P.M., Buissing, N., (eds), (2019). Behind and Beyond the Chicago Convention: The Evolution of Aerial Sovereignty. Den Haag: Kluwer Law International. Pp. 197–207.
13. Honig, J.P., (1956). The Legal Status of Aircraft. Dordrecht: Springer, 218, doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-0987-9_3.
14. Horní k, J., (2001). Navigation in Airspace — a Legal Trichotomy. LL.M. Thesis. Institute of Air and Space Law, McGiIl University.
15. Linderfalk, U., (2007). On the Interpretation of Treaties: The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Dordrecht: Springer.
16. Maleev, Y.N., (1988). International Legal Issues in the Airspace Regime. Soviet Yearbook of International Law, pp. 186–201. (In Russ.).
17. Milde, M., (2008a). International Air Law and ICAO. Utrecht: Eleven International Publ.
18. Milde, M., (2008b). Rendition Flights and International Air Law. German Journal of Air and Space Law, 57(4), pp. 477–486.
19. Samorodova, E.A., (2008). International Legal Issues Relating to the Drafting and Adoption of a Universal (General) Convention on Air Law. Thesis of Candidate of Sciences in Jurisprudence. Moscow. (In Russ.).
20. Travnikov, A.I., (2014). The Legal Regime of Airspace. Aeronautical Navigation and Safety. Moscow: Prospect Publ. (In Russ.).
21. Whiteman, M., (1968). Digest of International Law. Vol. 12. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22. Wickramasinghe, A., (2016). Military Interference on Civil Aviation: Any Improvements. Annals of Air and Space Law, 41, pp. 225–254.
23. Wouters, A. and Verhoeven, S., (2022). State Aircraft. In: Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law. Available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law9780199231690-e1223 [Accessed 14.04.2022].
Review
For citations:
Ivanov D.V., Donakanian V.G. Legal Concept of a State Aircraft is “Up in the Air”: Problems of a Definition. Kutafin Law Review. 2024;11(1):22-49. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.1.27.022-049
Views:
487
Email this article 
