The Balance of Justice: The Water Right and Large Dams in the Tigris and Euphrates Basin
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.2.28.370-385
Abstract
This research investigates the political dimensions related to the implementation of top-down planning strategies for the development of extensive hydraulic infrastructure within the Euphrates-Tigris basin. Considering an increasingly severe water issues and a deficiency of collaboration among nations sharing transboundary river systems, the presence of dams and reservoirs has become a subject of contention due to conflicting interests in resource depletion and utilization. This analysis draws upon the theoretical perspectives of poststructuralism in the field of human geography, particularly focusing on the politics of scale, as well as the existing body of literature on megaprojects. The key argument put out in this study is that hydraulic infrastructures play a significant role, both physically and rhetorically, in shaping and sustaining waterscapes at various sizes, hence supporting wider political agendas. Utilizing ethnographic fieldwork as a primary source, this paper examines the narratives propagated via both non-state and state actors in relation to the construction of supplementary dams, with a specific emphasis on the autonomous territory of Iraqi Kurdistan. The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) perceives hydraulic infrastructure as a means of ensuring security and promoting wealth, aligning with the broader narrative of Kurdish fate. However, transnational civil society organizations have united to oppose the adverse consequences of large-scale projects and have campaigned for a shared framework in the Mesopotamian region. The hydraulic infrastructure, in every scenario, serves as a structural foundation for political endeavours aimed at securing the acknowledgment of rights and establishing the suitable extent of government. In addition, the implementation of bottom-up defence strategies is complemented by the advocacy for a participatory and inclusive attitude towards the shared water resources management. From this particular standpoint, the spatial politics of large-scale projects overlap with issues pertaining to identity, fairness, and sustainability.
About the Author
Sangar S. Asaad
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sangar S. Asaad, PhD Student, Contemporary International Law, Department of Legal Sciences,
Moscow.
References
1. Bichsel, C., (2016). Water and the (infra-)structure of political rule: A synthesis. Water Alternatives, 9(2), pp. 356–372.
2. Bremer, N., (2013). 7. Dams on Euphrates and Tigris: Impact and Regulation Through International Law. In: Water Law and Cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris Region, pp. 145–176. Brill Nijhoff .
3. Conker, A. and Hussein, H., (2019). Hydraulic mission at home, hydraulic mission abroad? Examining Turkey’s regional “pax-aquarum” and its limits. Sustainability, 11(1), pp. 228–248.
4. Harris, L.M. and Alatout, S., (2010). Negotiating hydro-scales, forging states: Comparison of the upper Tigris/Euphrates and Jordan River basins. Political Geography, 29(3), pp. 148–156.
5. Heshmati, A., (2009). Integrated water resource management in the Kurdistan region. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Pp. 1–225.
6. Kibaroglu, A. and Scheumann, W., (2013). Evolution of transboundary politics in the Euphrates-Tigris river system: New perspectives and political challenges. Global Governance, 19, pp. 279–305, doi: 10.1163/19426720-01902008.
7. Kibaroglu, A., (2019). State-of-the-art review of transboundary water governance in the Euphrates-Tigris river basin. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(1), pp. 4–29, doi: 10.1080/07900627.2017.1408458.
8. Lorenz, F.M. and Erickson, E.J., (1999). The Euphrates Triangle: Security Implications of the Southeastern Anatolia Project. Washington: National Defense University Press.
9. Menga, F. and Swyngedouw, E., (2018). Water, Technology and the Nation-State. London: Routledge.
10. Mitchell, T., (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Univ. of California Press. USA.
11. Oei, P.Y. and Siehlow, M., (2016). Modeling Water Manag ement Options for the Tigris-Euphrates Rivershed. International Journal of Education and Learning Systems, 1, pp. 140–150.
12. Stahl, D., (2014). The two rivers: Water, development and politics in the Tigris-Euphrates Basin, 1920–1975. Doctoral dissertation. Columbia University, Columbia.
13. Yuksel, I., (2015). South-eastern Anatolia Project (GAP) factor and energy management in Turkey. Energy Reports, 1, pp. 151–155.
14. Zeitoun, M. and Warner, J., (2006). Hydro-hegemony — a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water confl icts. Water Policy, 8(5), pp. 435–460, doi: 10.2166/wp.2006.054.
Review
For citations:
Asaad S.S. The Balance of Justice: The Water Right and Large Dams in the Tigris and Euphrates Basin. Kutafin Law Review. 2024;11(2):370-385. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.2.28.370-385
Views:
384
Email this article 
