Vietnam’s State Monopolies: a Historical Development
https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2017.2.8.361-387
Abstract
This paper explores historical developmental stages, rationales for the existence, and characteristics of Vietnam’s state monopolies as legal structures. It contributes to the explanation why competition policy concerns arising from the existence of state monopolies in Vietnam are long-lasting issues and thus hopes to enrich the source of knowledge about the formation and work of state monopolies in transitional economies. It is concluded that Vietnam’s state monopolies have strongly been influenced by political thinking and determined by its socio-economic context and the assertion of “leading role of state economy” concept.
References
1. Arkadie, B. Van and Mallon, R. (2003). Vietnam - A Transition Tiger? Asia Pacific Press.
2. Arup, C. and Wishart, D. (2002). Competition Policy with Legal Form - reviewing Australian and overseas experience. Law in Context. Special Edition. Vol. 20 (1).
3. Berg, S. V. (1999). Fundamentals of Economic Regulation (paper presented at the Fifth Annual PURC/World Bank International Training Program on Utility Regulation, January 11).
4. Borje Ljunggren (1993). The Challenges of Reform in Indochina, cited by Le Khan and Dutt, A. K. (2003). Central Planning and Market Elements in Vietnam’s Economy, in Dutt A. K. et al. (eds.). Challenges to Asian Urbanization in the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Bork, R. H. (1978). The Antitrust Paradox. Basic Books.
6. Bui Van Huyen (2008). Xay dung va Phat trien Tap doan Kinhte o Viet Nam (Building and Developing Economic Groups in Vietnam). National Political Publishing House.
7. Central Institute for Economic Management (CIEM) (2002). Mot so Van de Phap ly va The che ve Chinh sach Canh tranh va Kiem soat Doc quyen Kinh doanh (Legal and Institutional Issues concerning Competition Policies and Control of Business Monopoly). Transport Publishing House.
8. Central Institute for Economic Management (CIEM) and Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA) (2006). Tiep tuc Xay dung va Hoan thien The che Kinh te thi truong Dinh huong XHCN o Vietnam (Continuous Building and Perfecting Institutional Framework for Market Economy with Socialist Orientation in Vietnam). Science and Technology Publishing House.
9. Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica. 4. 1.
10. Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 3. 1.
11. Communist Party of Vietnam (1994). Documents of the 7th Meeting of Central Committee Section VII. National Political Publishing House.
12. Daintith, T. and Teubner, G. (eds.) (1986). Contract and Organisation: Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory. W. de Gruyter.
13. Dang Vu Huan (2002). Phap luat Ve Kiem soat Doc quyen va Chong Canh tranh Khong Lanh manh o Vietnam (Law concerning Monopoly Control and Anti-Unfair Competition in Vietnam). PhD in Law Thesis. Hanoi Law University.
14. Dao Xuan Thuy (2009). Dieu kien va Giai phap Hinh thanh Cac Tap doan Kinh te Tu Cac Tong Cong ty 91 (Conditions and Solutions for the Establishment of Economic Groups on the Basis of the 91 State General Corporations). National Political Publishing House.
15. Do Huy Ha (2007). Xay dung Tap doan Kinh te: Giai phap Nang cao Kha nang Canh tranh va Hoi nhap Cua Cac Tong Cong ty Nha nuoc Hien nay. Quanly Kinhte (Building State Economic Groups: Solutions to Enhance Competition and Integration Capability of General State Corporations Today. Economic Management). Available at: http://www.ciem.org.vn/home/vn/upload/webimage/image/1190686803136_bai_2.pdf
16. Dwight H. Perkins and Vu Thanh Tu Anh (2008). Vietnam’s Industrial Policy. Designing Policies for Sustainable Development. Available at: www.vdf.org.vn/Doc/2008/VDFConf_Presentation3_PaperEng.pdf
17. Fforde, A. and Vylder, S. de (1996). From Plan to Market The Economic Transition of Vietnam. Westview Press.
18. Fforde, A. (2007). Vietnamese State Industry and the Political economy of Commercial Rennaissance: dragon’s tooth or curate’s egg? Chandos.
19. Gaisnborough, M. (2009). The (Neglected) Statist Bias and the Developmental State: the Case of Singapore and Vietnam. Third World Quarterly. 30. 1317.
20. George, E. St. and Quilty, M. (2006). Reconfiguring Socialist Ideology in Vietnam: The 2006 Tenth National Party Congress and the lead-up to Vietnam’s entry into the World Trade Organisation (paper presented at the 16th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia, Wollongong, 26-29 June). (paper presented at the 16th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia, Wollongong, 26-29 June).
21. Gillespie, J. S. (2006). Transplanting Commercial Law Reform, Developing a ‘Rule of Law’ State in Vietnam. Ashgate.
22. Ginsburg, T. (2000). Does Law Matter for Economic Development? Evidence from East Asia. Law and Society Review. 34. 829.
23. Haggard, St., Macintyre, A., and Tiede, L. (2008). The Rule of law and Economic Development. Annual Review of Political Science. 11. 205.
24. Izdebski, H. (1989). Legal Aspects in Economic Reforms in Socialist Countries. American Journal of Comparative Law. 37 (4). 730.
25. Jones, A. and Sufrin, B. (2008). EC Competition Law. Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.
26. Kahn, A. (1988). The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions. Reissue Edition. MIT Press. Chapter 4.
27. Kahn-Freund, O. (1974). On Use and Misuse of Comparative Law. Modern Law Review. 37. 1.
28. Khuc Hoang Giang (2000). Mot so Van de ve Diavi Phaply Cua Tong Cong ty Nhanuoc Trong Nen Kinhte Thitruong o Viet Nam (Some Issues regarding the Legal Position of State General Corporations in Vietnam’s Market Economy). LLM Thesis. Hochiminh City Law University.
29. Krever, T. (2011). The legal Turn in Late Development Theory: the Rule of Law and the World Bank’s Development Model. Harvard International Law Journal. 52. 287.
30. Le Danh Vinh (2003). Building Competition Law in Vietnam to Meet the Need of Regulating Market Economy and in the light of Trade Liberalization and International Economic Integration (paper presented at ASEAN Conference on Fair Competition Law and Policy in the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) Bali, March 5-7). Available at: http://www.jftc.go.jp/eacpf/04/vietnam_p.pdf.
31. Legrand, P. (1997). The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 4.
32. Le Viet Thai, Vu Xuan Nguyet Hong, Tran Van Hoa (2003). Anti-trust Law and Competition Policy in Vietnam: Macroeconomic Perspective, in Tran Van Hoa. Competition Policy and Global Competitiveness in Major Asian Economies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
33. Le Hoang Oanh (2005). Binh luan Khoa hoc Luat Canh tranh (Commentary on the Law on Competition). National Political Publishing House.
34. Masina, P. (2006). Vietnam’s Development Strategies. Routledge.
35. McGrath, L. A. (1996). Vietnam’s Struggle to Balance Sovereignty, Centralization and Foreign Investment under Doi Moi. Fordham International Law Journal. 18. 2095.
36. Mekong Economics (2002). SOE Reform in Vietnam. Available at: http://www.mekongeconomics.com/Document/Publications/2GG2/MKE%20SOE%20Reform%20in20Vietnam.pdf.
37. Nguyen Nhu Phat (1997). The Role of Law during the Formation of a Market-driven mechanism in Vietnam, in Gillespie, J. S. Commercial Legal Developments in Vietnam: Vietnamese and Foreign Commentaries. Butterworths.
38. Nguyen Nhu Phat, Bao cao Tong hop de tai (2005). Xay dung The che Canh tranh Thi truong o Viet Nam (Overall Report of the Project “Building up a Market Competition Institution in Vietnam”).
39. Nguyen Van Huy and Tran Van Nghia (1996). Government Policies and State-Owned Enterprise Reform, in Ng Chee Yuen, N. J. Freeman and F. H. Huynh (eds.). State-Owned Enterprise Reform in Vietnam: Lesson from Asia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises: A Survey of OECD Countries. OECD, Publishing.
41. Pincus. J. and Vu Thanh Tu Anh (2008). Vietnam feels the Heat. Far Eastern Economic Review. 171. Available at: http://www.viet-studies.info/kinhte/VN_feels_heat_FEER.htm.
42. Roe, M. J. (1999). A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance. Stanford Law Review. 52. 127.
43. Rohland, K. (2006). State to Tread Fine Line in Boosting Competitiveness. Interview with Vietnam News Agency. Available at: http://vietnamnews.vnanet.vn/showarticle.php?num=01COM151206.
44. Sharkey, W. W. (1982). The Theory of Natural Monopoly. Cambridge University Press.
45. Sherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. 2nd ed. Houghton Mifflin.
46. Sujian Guo (2006). The Political Economy of Asian Transition from Communism. Ashgate.
47. Trang Thi Tuyet et al. (2006). Mot so Giai phap Hoan thien Quan ly Nha nuoc Doi voi Doanh nghiep (Some Solutions to Enhance State Management for Enterprises). National Political Publishing House. 91.
48. Tran Tien Cuong (1997). Restructuring of State-Owned Enterprises and Relation between the State and State-Owned Enterprises in Vietnam, in Gillespie, J. S. Commercial Legal Developments in Vietnam: Vietnamese and Foreign Commentaries. Butterworths.
49. Tran Tien Cuong. Viet Nam Se Co Nhung Tap doan Kinhte Manh? (Will Vietnam Have Powerful Economic Groups?). Available at: http://www.mof.gov.vn/Default.aspx?tabid=612&ItemID=20841.
50. Tran Van Tho (2000). Vietnamese Gradualism in Reforms of the State-Owned Enterprises. 92. Available at: http://www.f.waseda.jp/tvttran/en/recentpapers/E02Statesowned%20entreprises%20in%20Vietnam.doc.
51. Truong Dong Loc (2006). Equitisation and Stock-Market Development: the Case of Vietnam. PhD in Economics Thesis. University of Groningen.
52. UNDP Vietnam (2006). The State as Investor: Equitisation, Privatisation and the Transformation of SOEs in Viet Nam. 15. Available at: http://www.undp.org.vn/undpLive/System/Publications/Publication-Details?contentId=2079&languageId=1&categoryName=&CategoryConditionUse=.
53. Vu Huy Tu et al. (2007). Co cau Lai Doanh nghiep Nha nuoc theo Luat Doanh nghiep nam 2005 (Restructuring State Corporations according to the Enterprises Law 2005). National Political Publishing House.
54. Vu Lien Huong (2003). Ther Role of Competition Policy and Approaching Method of Competition Bill of Vietnam. Available at: www.apeccp.org.tw/doc/APEC-OECD/2003-12/014.pdf
55. Vu Quoc Ngu (2002). The State-Owned Enterprise Reform in Vietnam: Process and Achievements. Available at: http://www.iseas.edu.sg/vr42002.pdf.
56. Watson, A. (1993). Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. 2nd ed. Edinburgh.
57. Webster, L. and Amin, R. M. (2008). Equitisation of State Enterprises in Vietnam: Experience to Date. Available at: http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/mekongpsdf.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/PSDP+3/$FILE/PSDP-No-3-EN.pdf.
58. Wishart, D. (2011). Competition Policy: the Reform of Laws and Regulation. LAWASIA Journal. 39.
59. Xueguo Wen (2008-2009). Market Dominance by China’s Public Utility Enterprises. Antitrust Law Journal. 75. 153.
60. Yarrow, G. (1994). The Economics of Regulation in Venkata Vemuri Ramanadham. Privatization and After: Monitoring and Regulation. Routledge.
Review
For citations:
Tran Thang Long Vietnam’s State Monopolies: a Historical Development. Kutafin Law Review. 2017;4(2):361-387. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2017.2.8.361-387
Views:
295
Email this article 
