Pro et Contra Criminalization of Corporate Liability in the Russian Federation
Abstract
The article focuses on different theoretical approaches towards establishing corporate criminal liability in national legislature of the Russian Federation. The article focuses on the roots and evolution of the problem of introducing criminal corporate liability, analyses arguments pro et contra corporate criminal liability as an instrument of prevention and combat against corporate and other forms of white-collar crime. The central part of the article examines different theoretical and practical views on introduction of corporate liability in general and in the Russian Federation in particular. The author aims to shed light on different dimensions of the matter, pointing to interdependency of various aspects.
About the Author
A. V. Shashkova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Moscow Region Bar Lawyer; Honorary Consul for St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Bequali, A. (1978). White Collar Crime: A 20th Century Crisis. Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts.
2. Bloch, H. R. (2013). Corporations and the Fourteenth Amendment. UCLA. P. 64.
3. Dignam, A. (2011). Company Law. Oxford University Press. P. 646.
4. Galbraith, J. K. (2007). The New Industrial State. Princeton University Press. P. 576.
5. Golubtsov, V. G., Kuznetsova, O. A. (2013). Russian Federation as the Subject of the Civil Liability. World Applied Sciences Journal. T. 24. No. 1. Pp. 31-34.
6. Goulding, S. (1999). Company Law. Cavendish Publishing Limited. 2nd ed. London, Sydney. P. 430.
7. Grantham, R. (1998). Corporate personality in the 20th Century. Oxford: Hart Publishing. P. 295.
8. Grimes, J. (2013). Fourth statutory corporate manslaughter conviction - are trends emerging? Kingsley Napley.
9. Hagan, E. F. (2010). Introduction to Criminology: Theories, Methods, and Criminal Behavior. SAGE Publications, Inc; Seventh Edition edition. P. 576.
10. Kudryashova, E. V. (2010). The Principle of the Financial Support of the Financial Planning in the Russian Federation. Financial Law. No. 7. Pp. 11-14.
11. Kudryashova, E. V. (2016). The Logic and Issues of International Regional Tax Integration. Russian Law: Theory and Practice. 2. Pp. 42-47.
12. Kudryashova, E. V. (2016). Bugetary Institutions in the Context of Budget Reforms in Russia. Kutafin University Law Review. 2 (6). Pp. 347-357.
13. Nagy, D. (2007). Criminalization of Corporate Law: The Impact of Criminal Sanctions on Corporate Misconduct. Journal of Business & Technology Law. 2 Pp. 91-95. URL: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2059&context=faculty_scholarship
14. Pearce, F. (1992). The contribution of “left realism’’ to the study of commercial crime, in McLean, B. and Lowman, J. (eds.). Realist Criminology: Crime Control and Policing in the 1990s. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
15. Pulbrook, A. (1865). The Companies Act, 1862, with analytical references and copious index. Effigham Wison. P. 233.
16. Rakitskaja, I. A. (2012). The General Characteristics of the Legislative Process Abroad. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet. Pp. 3-16.
17. Shashkova, A. V. (2015). Criminalization of Corporate Responsibility. Politics, the State and the Law. No. 8 (44). Pp. 15-21.
18. Shashkova, A. V. (2011). Financial & Legal Aspects of Doing Business in Russia. Aspect-Press. P. 256.
19. Shashkova, A. V. (2015). Study Manual on Bases of Russian Law. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. P. 374.
20. Shashkova, A. V. (2015). Russian Specifics in Combating Corruption. Kutafin University Law Review. Is. 2 (3). Pp. 51-67.
21. Tanzi, V. (1999). Uses and abuses of estimates of the underground economy. Economic Journal. Ed. 109. UK. Pp. 286-296.
Review
For citation:
Shashkova A.V. Pro et Contra Criminalization of Corporate Liability in the Russian Federation. Kutafin Law Review. 2017;4(2):544-554. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2017.2.8.544-554
Views: 112
Email this article 