The Legal Status of Religious Ministers: Foreign and Russian Experience of Normative Legal Regulation
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.4.30.718-740
Abstract
Religious ministers are among the subjects implementing the constitutional right to freedom of religion. Their status is regulated both by the “internal law” of religious associations and by the norms of the constitutional law of a particular state, which determines the complexity of the study. The aim of this paper is to make a comparative study of the most significant legislative bases of the legal status of religious ministers in fifty-seven countries. The research will allow us to verify the hypothesis about the validity of singling out the subinstitution of religious ministers within the framework of the complex constitutional legal institution of freedom of religion. For the comparative analysis, the author uses five criteria that make it possible to consider the limits of the autonomy of religious organizations with regard to the appointment of their ministers and the guarantees of securing their status: the requirement of citizenship, the binding obligation to notify the authorities of their appointment, the maintenance of registers of ministers, the peculiarities of instituting criminal proceedings with regard to the interaction with religious associations and the restrictions on their activities. The author uses formal-dogmatic and functional methods together with the comparative legal method. Conclusions are drawn on the ways of consolidating certain aspects of the status of religious ministers in regulatory legal acts and, taking into account certain comparative criteria, the options of state regulation with the most restrictive effect are determined.
About the Author
I. A. PibaevRussian Federation
Igor A. Pibaev, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of State Legal Disciplines
Kirov
References
1. Andreev, K.M., (2014). The Right to Religious Secrets in the Russian Federation (Issues of Theory and Practice). Moscow: Jurisprudence Publ. (In Russ.).
2. McLoughlin, W.G., (1971). New England Dissent 1630–1833: The Baptists and the Separation of Church and State. Harvard University Press.
3. Neha, C., (2017). Religious Conversion and Freedom of Religion in India: Debates and Dilemmas. ILI Law Review. Summer Issue, 1, pp. 126–136.
4. Orehov, I.V., (2016). Problems of Classification of Subinstitutes of Law. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, [Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 1, pp. 37–47, doi: 10.17323/2072-8166.2016.1.37.47. (In Russ.).
5. Ovsepjan, Zh.I., (2017). Constitutional Statuses of Religions in the Modern World (States of Europe, Asia, Hindustan and the Far East). Konstitutsionnoe i municipalnoe pravo, 7, pp. 34–44. (In Russ.).
6. Pavlyuk, I., priest., (2022). Peculiarities of the Legal Status of Clergy in Russia. Sretenskoe slovo, 2, pp. 155–168, doi: 10.55398/27826066_2022_2_155. (In Russ.).
7. Pchelintsev, A.V., (2012). Freedom of Religion and Religious Associations in the Russian Federation (Constitutional and Legal Research). Abstract of Dr. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Russian State Trade and Economic University, Moscow. (In Russ.).
8. Pibaev, I.A., (2022). Accreditation of the Activities of Clergy as a Mechanism for Countering Religious Extremist Ideology: Our Own among Strangers or Strangers among Our Own? Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, 1(146), pp. 108–135, doi: 10.21128/1812-7126-2022- 1-108-135. (In Russ.).
9. Ponkin, I.V., (2004). On the Typology of Secular States. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public Administration], 2004, 1 (27), pp. 96–101. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Pibaev I.A. The Legal Status of Religious Ministers: Foreign and Russian Experience of Normative Legal Regulation. Kutafin Law Review. 2024;11(4):718. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.4.30.718-740