Preview

Kutafin University Law Review

Advanced search

The Concept of Worker in EU-Labour Law - Still Fit for Purpose?

https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2018.1.9.021-045

Full Text:

Abstract

The growth of the number of persons working in the grey zone between traditional workers and those genuinely self-employed poses the question if EU labour law is still fit for purpose, i.e. providing those in need with the protection they require. Changes either refining the concept of the worker as well as the introduction of a third, intermediary category between workers and selfemployed on the EU-level do not seem too realistic in the near future though. Therefore, one is guided towards the possible activities of the ECJ when called upon to interpret the concept of “worker” in EU labour law.

About the Authors

M. Risak
University of Vienna
Russian Federation


T. Dullinger
University of Vienna
Russian Federation


References

1. Barnard, C. (2012). European Employment Law. 4th edition. OUP, Oxford.

2. Beford, St. and Budd, J. (2009). Invisible hands, invisible objectives. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

3. Brodil, W. and Risak, M. (2016). Arbeitsrecht in Grundzügen. 9th edition. LexisNexis, Vienna.

4. Davidov, G. (2016). A purposive approach to Labour Law. OUP, Oxford.

5. Davies, A. (2012). EU Labour Law. Edward Elgar.

6. De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”:

7. Ondemand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the “gig-economy”. ILO, Geneva.

8. Freedland, M. and Davies, P. (1983). Kahn-Freund’s Labour and the Law. Stephens & Sons, London.

9. Harris, S. and Krueger, A. (2015). A Proposalfor Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-First Century Work: The “Independent Worker”. Hamilton Project, Discussion Paper. 2015-10.

10. Lobel, O. (2016). The Gig Economy & The Future of Employment and Labor Law. SD Legal Studies Research Paper. No. 16-223.

11. Rehbahn, R. (2016). Neue Formen der Arbeit - Unionsrechtliche Aspekte. In: Tomandl, Th. and Risak, M. (eds.). Wie bewältigt das Recht Modere Formen der Arbeit? New Academic Press, Vienna.

12. Riesenhuber, K. (2012). European Employment Law. Intersentia, Cambridge.

13. Risak, M. (1999). Verwirrungen um den AN-Begriff des ASchG. Ecolex. 43.

14. Risak, M (2010). Austrian Labour Law. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn.

15. Schwarze, J. (2012). EU-Kommentar. 3rd edition. Nomos, Baden-Baden.

16. Schlachter, M. (2014). EU Labour Law. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn.

17. Temming, F. (2016). Systemverschiebungen durch den unionsrechtlichen Arbeitnehmerbegriff - Entwicklungen, Herausforderungen und Perspektiven. Soziales Recht. 158.

18. Weiss, M. and Schmidt, M. (2008). German Labour Law and Industrial Relations. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn.


For citation:


Risak M., Dullinger T. The Concept of Worker in EU-Labour Law - Still Fit for Purpose? Kutafin University Law Review. 2018;5(1):21-45. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2018.1.9.021-045

Views: 14


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-5395 (Print)
ISSN 2410-2059 (Online)