The Risk Theory of the Principle of Equality of Creditors
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2025.1.31.117-143
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the nature of bankruptcy law as a mechanism for implementing the principle of equality of creditors. This principle assumes that creditors should bear the risk of insolvency of the debtor. This risk is expressed in the proportion of the claim that turns out to be unsatisfied. Bankruptcy law deals with the distribution of the corresponding risk to creditors of different classes. The essence of the relations of the creditors of an insolvent debtor with each other can be understood through the definition of: 1) the subject in relation to which such relations arise; 2) claims of creditors in respect of this subject matter. The subject of relations of creditors with each other is the bankruptcy estate of the debtor, which (and only which) will be used by each of the creditors to obtain satisfaction. The claim to the insolvent debtor to receive satisfaction under the obligation coexists with the claim to other creditors to receive part of the bankruptcy estate. The right of claim arising from the obligation and addressed to the debtor, in the event of the debtor’s insolvency, gives rise to the right to receive part of the bankruptcy estate, addressed to other creditors of the insolvent debtor. However, the lack of the right to claim against the debtor makes the right to a part of the estate addressed to the debtor’s creditors impossible.
Keywords
bankruptcy,
insolvency,
pari passu,
risk,
proportionality,
prioritization,
segregation,
claims,
law of obligations
About the Author
E. D. Suvorov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeniy D. Suvorov, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Civil Law
Moscow
References
1. Bevzenko, RS., (2022). Property Security: Pledge, Retention and Title Security Structures. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow: RANEPA under the President of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.).
2. Black, H.C., (1968). Black’s Law Dictionary (1968). Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern. 4th ed. West Publishing Co.
3. Bork, R., (2017). Economic Analysis of Transaction Avoidance in Insolvency. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Bulletin of Economic Justice in the Russian Federation], 8, pp. 150– 166. (In Russ.).
4. Duvernois, N.L, (2004). Readings on civil law. Vol. 1: Introduction. The doctrine of the person. Moscow. (In Russ.).
5. Finch, V. and Milman, D., (2017). Corporate Insolvency Law: Perspectives and Principles. 3d ed. Cambridge University Press.
6. Goode, R., (1997). Principle of Corporate Insolvency Law. 2nd ed. London: Sween & Maxwell.
7. Goode, R., (2011). Principles of Corporate Insolvency Law. 4th ed. Sweet & Maxwell Publ. (In Russ.).
8. Guglielmucci, L., (2017). Diritto Fallimentare. Ottava edizione: a cura di F. Padovini, con la collaborazione di E. Ban. G. Giappichelli Editore; Torino. (In Italian).
9. Ihering, R., (1880). Interes i parvo [Interest and Right]. Yaroslavl: Typogr. gub. zem. upravy. (In Russ.).
10. Karelina, S.A., (2008). Mechanism of Legal Regulation of Insolvency Relations. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer Publ. (In Russ.).
11. McBryde, W.W., Flessner, A. and Kortmann, S.C.J.J., (2003). Principles of European Insolvency Law. In: Series Law of Business and Finance. Vol. 4. Deventer Publ.
12. Mokal, R.J., (2001). Priority as Pathology: the Pari Passu Myth. Cambridge Law Journal, 60(3), pp. 581–621. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=303739.
13. Norton, W.L. Jr. and Norton, W.L., (2008). Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, 2nd ed. Bankruptcy Code and Related Legislation, Legislative History, Editorial Commentary, Case Annotations.
14. Shershenevich, G.F., (2003). Trade Law Course. Vol. IV: Trading Process. Competitive Process. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).
15. Sukhanov, E.A., (2014). Comparative Corporate Law. Moscow: Statute Publ. (In Russ.).
16. Tomsinov, V.A., ed., (2008). Imperatritsa Ekaterina Vtoraya. Nakaz, dannyy Komissii o sochinenii proekta novogo Ulozheniya [Empress Catherine the Second. The Order Given to the Commission on drafting of a new Code]. Moscow: Zertsalo Publ. (In Russ.).
17. Tretyakov, S.V., (2022). Development of the doctrine of subjective private law in foreign civil law. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow; 2022. (In Russ.).
18. Vasilevskaya, L.Yu., (2004). Konstruktsiya “pravo na pravo” v grazhdanskom prave: istoki i normativnoe regulirovanie [The construction of “right to right” in civil law: origins and normative regulation]. Vestnik federalnogo arbitrazhnogo suda zapadno-sibirskogo okruga [Bulletin of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the West Siberian District], No. 1, pp. 90–112. (In Russ.).
19. Zautrennikov, K.S., (2019). The problem of contestation of third parties’ payments as transactions with unfair preference executed on account of the debtor-bankrupt’s property. Arbitrazhnye spory [Arbitrazh Disputes], 3, pp. 85–92. (In Russ.).
20. Zwieten, K., (2019). Goode on Principles of Corporate Insolvency Law. 5th Student Ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Review
For citations:
Suvorov E.D. The Risk Theory of the Principle of Equality of Creditors. Kutafin Law Review. 2025;12(1):117-143. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2025.1.31.117-143
Views:
67
Email this article 
