An Examination of the Protectability of Photographs: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, France, Italy and China
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2025.2.32.428-452
Abstract
The majority of states nowadays grant legal protection to photographs. Most often, photography is the object of related rights. However, legislative solutions are not limited to this approach. The legal protection of photographs varies significantly across different jurisdictions, often due to historical, cultural, and legal influences. For example, in some countries, photographs are protected as objects of neighboring rights or as a separate group of objects. This article explores the legal protectability of photographs through a comparative analysis focusing on four countries: Germany, France, Italy, and China. It reveals that while all these countries offer some form of legal protection to photographs, the nature and extent of this protection can differ markedly. Based on the comparison of approaches, the peculiarities of legal regulation of photography (as an object of intellectual property rights) are revealed. This comparative study reveals notable differences in the legal criteria and scope of protection, reflecting diverse cultural and legal traditions associated with intellectual property rights. Understanding these distinctions is essential for photographers, legal practitioners, and policymakers involved in intellectual property rights, ensuring that the protection granted is appropriate to the cultural and legal context. This exploration highlights the ongoing need for international dialogue and convergence in the standards of photographic protection, particularly in an era of rapid technological advancement and global digital dissemination.
Keywords
photographs,
comparative analysis,
copyrights,
related rights,
legal protection,
originality,
legal standards
Supporting agencies: The research was carried out within the support of the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 24-28-00567. Available at: https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-00567/.
About the Authors
P. I. Petkilev
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Petr I. Petkilev, Research Intern, Department of Civil Law and Procedure and International Private Law
Moscow
A. V. Pokrovskaya
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna V. Pokrovskaya, Assistant, Research Intern, Department of Civil Law and Procedure and International Private Law
Moscow
References
1. Benjamin, W., (1996). Petite histoire de la photographie [A short history of photography]. Études photographiques [Photographic studies], 1, pp. 1–20. (In French).
2. Egloff, W., Agosti, D., Kishor, P., Patterson, D. and Miller, J.A., (2016). Copyright and the use of images as biodiversity data. [Form paper] e12502. Pp. 087015, doi: 10.3897/rio.3.e12502.
3. Finocchiaro, G.D., (2020). La valorizzazione delle opere d’arte on line e in particolare la diffusione on line di fotografie di opere d’arte [The valorization of works of art online and in particular the online diffusion of photographs of works of art]. Profili giuridici. Aedon [Legal Profiles. Aedon], 3, pp. 197–202. (In Ital.).
4. Fromm, F.K., Nordemann, W. and Hertin, P.W., (1988). Urheberrecht: Kommentar zum Urheberrechtsgesetz und zum Urheberrechtswahrnehmungsgesetz: mit den Texten der Urheberrechtsgesetze der DDR [Copyright: Commentary on the Copyright Act and the Copyright Administration Act: with the texts of the copyright laws of the GDR]. Österreichs und der Schweiz. Stuttgart u.a.: Kohlhammer. (In Germ.).
5. Galli, C., (2013). Fotografie, proprietà delle opere e titolarità di diritti d’autore e diritti sull’immagine: i possibili conflitti [Photographs, ownership of works and ownership of copyright and image rights: possible conflicts]. Di chi sono le immagini nel mondo delle immagini? [Whose are the images in the world of images?]. SKIRA. (In Ital.).
6. Liu, Y.J., (2014). Second Only to the Original: Rhetoric and Practice in the Photographic Reproduction of Art in Early Twentieth-Century China. Art History, 37(1), pp. 68–95.
7. Ma, Y., (2016). The Copyright Recognition of Reproduced Photographic Works. Legal Studies, 4(4), pp. 151.
8. Musso, A., (2010). Opere fotografiche e fotografie documentarie nella disciplina dei diritti di autore o connessi: un parallelismo sistematico con la tutela dei beni culturali [Photographic works and documentary photographs in the discipline of copyright or related rights: a systematic parallel with the protection of cultural heritage]. Aedon, 2, 1–6, doi: 10.7390/31221. (In Ital.).
9. Nordemann, W., (1987). Lichtbildschutz für fotografisch hergestellte Vervielfèaltigungen? [Photo protection for photographically produced reproductions?]. German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR), pp. 15–18. (In Germ.).
10. Osterrieth, A. and Marwitz, B., (1929). Das Urheberrecht an Werken der bildenden Kü nste und der Photographie, Gesetz vom 9. Januar 1907 mit den Abä nderungen vom 22. Mai 1910. 2. Auflage. (In Germ.).
11. Pappani, G., (2019). La fotografia e l’arte nell’era digitale: prospettive in Italia [Photography and Art in the Digital Age: Perspectives in Italy]. IL capitale culturale. IL capitale culturale. [Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage], 19, pp. 575–596. (In Ital.).
12. Petri, G., (2021). Kunsthistorische Publikationen und Bildrechte zwischen dem BGH-Urteil zu Museumsfotos (2018) und der Umsetzung der Richtlinie (EU) 2019/790 [Art historical publications and image rights between the Federal Court of Justice ruling on museum photos (2018) and the implementation of Directive (EU) 2019/790]. In: Effinger, M. and Kohle, H. (eds). Die Zukunft des kunsthistorischen Publizierens [The future of art historical publishing]. arthistoricum.net. Heidelberg, pp. 65–77, doi: 10.11588/arthistoricum.663.C10510. (In Germ.).
13. Sun, H., (2005). Reconstructing reproduction right protection in China. J. Copyright Soc’y USA, 53, pp. 223–286.
14. Wandtke, A.A. and Bullinger, W., (2014). Praxiskommentar zum Urheberrecht [Practical commentary on copyright]. C.H. Beck Publ.
15. Wang, Q., (2012). Copyright Law Drawing on International Treaties and Foreign Legislation: Problems and Countermeasures. China Law Journal, 3, pp. 3241–3247.
16. Wang, Q., (2022). The Term of Protection for Photographic Works in the 2020 Copyright Law: Some Remarks and a Proposal for Revision. Journal of the Copyright Society, 69, pp. 79–105.
17. Zhang, H., (2023). The “Copyright Troll” of Photographic Works in the Internet Era: A Study of Countermeasures and Legal Regulation. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(5), pp. 236–249.
Review
For citations:
Petkilev P.I., Pokrovskaya A.V. An Examination of the Protectability of Photographs: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, France, Italy and China. Kutafin Law Review. 2025;12(2):428-452. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2025.2.32.428-452
Views:
51
Email this article 
