Legal Mode of the Seal of Confession. Correlation of Secular and Canon Law
Abstract
The scope of regulation of social relations connected with both secular and canon laws are of great interest for the researchers. In particular, these relations are linked to the constitutional presumption of the separation of the church and the state. At the same time, there is a tendency of convergence of the church and the state in matters concerning property, correlation of church and secular education, etc. The clergy by virtue of the nature of their professional duties, mostly deal with private and personal information and it is also a sphere of common interest for both the state and the church. The use of the comparative legal research methods, methods of the analysis and synthesis of the situation have made it possible to match the norms of the canon and secular law and identify some elements of their relations. The main purpose of the article is the comprehensive study of the seal of confession, its conceptual framework, legal regulation, judicial practice, forms and types of responsibility for its violation. This paper examines historical facets of development of the seal of confession, beginning with the Spiritual Regulations and up to the modern ecclesiastical and secular norms. The Spiritual Regulations were specific since they contained no absolute inviolability of the seal of confession as soon as the information concerned the security of higher officials. The paper also highlights the legal framework of the secrecy of the confessional, being some professional religious mystery, on the one hand, as well as a legal mode and a form of some sensitive or restricted information, on the other. The Fundamentals of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church contain the requirements and tell the priest how to classify the information communicated to him by his parishioner. The article focuses on some features of the seal of confession practice abroad, particularly in Germany and the USA. Eventually, the US laws provide for the circumstances where the communication of the clergy and their parishioners should remain confidential. There are, however, some requirements compelling the priest to report whenever protection of children is involved. The jurisprudence supports the rules regulating the seal of confession. Three relevant cases have been studied by the authors and they involve the separation of secular and religious laws.
About the Authors
D. Shibaev
Northwestern Institute (branch) of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. Uibo
Northwestern Institute (branch) of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Smirnov S.I. Drevnerusskij Dukhovnik [Old Russian Confessor]. Directmedia Publ., 2013.
2. Tsypin V.A. Tserkovnoe pravo. [Canon law]. Kiev, 2012.
3. O tainstvakh. Tainstvo pokayaniya. [Chirch Misteries. Mystery of Repentance]. URL: http://www.pravoslavie.ru/2121.html (accessed 21 August 2018).
4. Tsypin V.A. Tserkovnoe pravo [Canon law]. Kiev, 2012.
5. Smykalin A.S. Kanonicheskoe pravo (na primere Russkoj pravoslavnoj tserkvi XI-XXI vv. [Canon law. On the example of the Russian Orthodox Church 11th-21st centuries]. Uchebnoe posobie [A Study-Guide], M., Prospekt Publ., 2015. 400 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=BAJcCgAAQBAJ&pg (accessed 21 August 2018).
6. Tsypin V.A. Tserkovnoe pravo [Canon law]. Kiev, 2012.
7. Dukhovnyj reglament [Spiritual Regulations]. URL: http:orthodox.ru/olb/303. php (accessed 21 August 2018).
8. Dukhovnyj reglament. Pravilo 11 [Spiritual regulations. Rule 11]. URL: http:orthodox.ru/olb/303.php (accessed 21 August 2018).
9. Reglament i Ustav Dukhovnoj kollegii, izdannyj 25 yanvarya 1721 g. Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. SPb., 1899. T. VI. No. 3718.
10. Federal’nyj zakon ot 26.09.1997 No. 125-FZ (red. ot 22.10.2014) “O svobode sovesti i o religioznykh ob”edineniyakh”. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF, 29.09.1997, No. 39, P. 4465.
11. Ugolovno-protsesual’nyj kodeks RF. Moscow, EHlit publ., 2014. 224 p.
12. Grazhdanskij protsessual’nyj kodeks RF. Moscow, Rossijskaya gazeta publ., 2014. 256 p.
13. Precht Pizarro J. Ministros de culto, secreto religioso y libertad religiosa. Revista Chilena de Derecho. 2004. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 337-349
14. See Ustav Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Tserkvi [Charter of the Russian Orthodox Church]. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/document/133114/ (accessed 21 August 2018)
15. Polozhenie o tserkovnom sude Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Tserkvi (Moskovskogo Patriarkhata) [Rules of the Ecclesiastic Court of the Russian Orthodox Church (Patriarchate of Moscow]. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/428440.html (accessed 21 August 2018)
16. Pchelintsev A.V. Absolyutna li tajna ispovedi [Is the mystery of the confession absolutely true]. Zakonodatel’stvo i ehkonomika, 2011, No. 5.
17. Osnovy sotsial’noj kontseptsii Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Tserkvi [Fundamentals of the social concept of the Russian Orthodox Church]. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/141422.html (accessed 21 August 2018).
18. Kosyachkin N.S. Garantii realizatsii konstitutsionnogo prava cheloveka na svobodu sovesti i veroispovedaniya v RF [Guarantees of the realization of the constitutional human right to freedom of conscience and religion in the Russian Federation]. EhZh-Yurist publ., 2013, No. 2
19. Skol’ko v mire religij [How many religions does exist?]. Obozrenie. Russkij tolstyj zhurnal. URL: http://sibcontek.ru/journal/world-religions/skolko-v-mire-religiy (accessed 21 August 2018)
20. The Basic Law of Germany. URL: https://www.bundestag.de/bundestag/ aufgaben/rechtsgrundlagen/grundgesetz/gg_11/245152 (accessed 21 August 2018).
21. Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/BJNR001270871.html (accessed 21 August 2018).
22. German Criminal Procedure Code. URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ stpo/BJNR006290950.html (accessed 21 August 2018).
23. Rules of Evidence” of the State of Alabama. URL: http://www.txcourts.gov/ media/921665/tx-rules-of-evidence.pdf (accessed 21 August 2018).
24. The State of Judicial Gatekeeping in Alaska. URL: http://cyber.law.harvard. edu/daubert/ak.htm (accessed 21 August 2018).
25. “Rules of Evidence” of the State of Alaska. URL: http://atheistfoundation. org.au/2014/07/04/anglican-church-removes-seal-of-confidentiality/ (accessed 21 August 2018).
26. Top Anglican calls for lifting seal of confessional in child abuse cases // The Washington Post. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/ top-anglican-calls-for-lifting-seal-of-confessional-in-child-abuse-cases/2014/10/23/ aeb3fbce-5aec-11e4-9d6c-756a229d8b18_story.html (accessed 21 August 2018).
27. Father Richard Umbers. The Seal Cannot Be Broken: Priestly Identity and the Sacrament of Confession. URL: http://www.abc.net.au/religion/ articles/2014/08/27/4075554.htm (accessed 21 August 2018).
28. Simcha Fisher. Some Questions about the Seal of Confession. URL: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/simcha-fisher/some-questions-about-the-seal-of-confession (accessed 21 August 2018).
29. Matter of John F. Keenan, Deputy Attorney-General, as Special State Prosecutor, Respondent, v. Louis R. Gigante, Appellant. Decision of Court of Appeals of the State of New York of 08.05.1979.
30. Anglim C.T. Encyclopedia of religion and the Law in America. Second Edition. Amenia (NY, USA): Grey House Publishing, Inc., 2009. 880 p. P. 114.
31. Kriminoteologiya: religioznaya prestupnost’ [Criminology; Religious crime]. Ed. by O.V. Starkov. St. Petersburg, R. Aslanov YUridicheskij tsentr Press publ., 2004. P. 386.
32. Svt. Ioann Zlatoust, 44, 469. URL: http://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Ioann_Zlatoust (accessed 21 August 2018).
33. Svt. Ioann Zlatoust, 54, 842. URL: http://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Ioann_Zlatoust (accessed 21 August 2018).
34. Prp. Isidor Pelusiot, 62, 343. URL: http://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Isidor_Pelusiot (accessed 21 August 2018).
35. Dolzhna li byt’ tajnoj tajna ispovedi [Should there be a secret of confession?]. URL: http://www.nnews.nnov.ru/news/2014/12/10/24239 (accessed 21 August 2018).
36. Polozhenie o cerkovnom sude Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi [Regulations on the Church court of the Russian Orthodox Church]. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/ db/text/428440.html (accessed 21 August 2018).
37. eptember 2018. URL: https:www.thetimes.co.ukarticlechurch-of-england-may-abolish-secrecy-of-confession-zwr6zw8jp (accessed 21 September 2018)
38. Tsypin V.A. Tserkovnoye pravo [Canon law]. Kiev, 2012. (In Russ.). Ugolovno-protsessual’noe pravo Rossijskoj Federatsii. Ed. by P.A. Lupinskaya. A Textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2009. (In Russ.). Volosova N.Yu. O tayne ispovedi i svidetel’skom immunitete svyashchennosluzhitelya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [On the mystery of confession and the witness immunity of the priest in criminal proceedings]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. No. 3. (In Russ.).
39. Anglim C.T. Encyclopedia of religion and the Law in America. Second Edition. Amenia (NY, USA): Grey House Publishing, Inc., 2009. 880 p
40. Boykov A. Nuzhno deystvovat’ v interesah prava [We need to act in the interests of law]. Novaya advokatskaya gazeta, 2010, No. 1 (66). (In Russ.)
41. Chernovalova I., Berezina E. Tayna ispovedi [The mystery of confession: who cannot say too much]. Moskovskiy buhgalter. 2006. No. 12. (In Russ.)
42. Church of England bishops rethink secrecy of the confession. The Times. 21 September 2018. URL: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/church-of-england-may-abolish-secrecy-of-confession-zwr6zw8jp (accessed 21 September 2018)
43. Kosyachkin N.S. Garantii realizatsii konstitutsionnogo prava cheloveka na svobodu sovesti i veroispovedaniya v RF [Guarantees of the realization of the constitutional human right to freedom of conscience and religion in the Russian Federation]. EZh-Yurist, 2013. No. 2. (In Russ.)
44. Kriminoteologiya: religioznaya prestupnost’ [Criminology: Religious Crime]. Ed. by O.V. Starkov. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo R. Aslanova YUridicheskij tsentr Press publ., 2004. (In Russ.)
45. Lupinskaya P.A. Ugolovno-protsessual’noye pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Criminal Procedure Law of the Russian Federation]. 2nd ed., Moscow, 2009. (In Russ.)
46. Mueller N., Krause G. Pastorskoye bogosloviye [Pastoral theology]. Moscow: Lyuteranskoye naslediye, 1999. (In Russ.)
47. Nosovsky Yu. Obman doveriya: donos po ispovedi [Deception of confidence: denunciation on confession]. URL: http://www.pravda.ru/faith/confessions/catholicism/05-12-2012/1137337-confession-0 (accessed 21 August 2018). (In Russ.)
48. Pchelintsev A.V Svoboda veroispovedaniya i religioznye ob’edineniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (konstitutsionno-pravovoye issledovaniye) [Freedom of Religion and Religious Associations in the Russian Federation (constitutional and legal research)]. Doctoral Dis. Abstract. Moscow, 2000. (In Russ.)
49. Pchelintsev A.V. Absolyutna li tayna ispovedi [Is the mystery of the confession absolutely true]. Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika, 2011, No. 5. (In Russ.)
50. Pilipenko Yu.S. Advokatskaya tayna: teoriya i praktika realizatcii [Advocate’s secret: theory and practice of implementation]. Avtoref. dis. dokt. jurid. nauk. Moscow, 2009. (In Russ.). Precht Pizarro J. Ministros de culto, secreto religioso y libertad religiosa. Revista Chilena de Derecho. 2004. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 337-349
51. Simcha Fisher. Some Questions about the Seal of Confession. URL: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/simcha-fisher/some-questions-about-the-seal-of-confession (accessed 21 August 2018)
52. Skol’ko v mire religij. [How many religions do exist?]. Obozrenie. Russkij tolstyj zhurnal. URL: http://sibcontek.ru/journal/world-religions/skolko-v-mire-religiy (accessed 21 August 2018). Smirnov S.I. Drevnerusskij Dukhovnik. [Old Russian Confessor]. Directmedia publ., 2013. (In Russ.)
53. Smykalin A.S. Kanonicheskoe pravo (na primere Russkoj pravoslavnoj tserkvi XI-XXI vv.). [Canon law (On the example of the Russian Orthodox Church 11th-21st centuries)]. Moscow, Prospekt publ., 2015. 400 p. (In Russ.)
54. Starkova O.V. Kriminoteologiya: religioznaya prestupnost’ [Criminal theology: religious crime]. St. Petersburg, izd-vo R.Aslanova Juridicheskiy tcentr Press, 2004. (In Russ.)
55. Tatyanin D.V. Nekotoryye voprosy, voznikayushchiye v svyazi s nevozmozhnost’yu doprosa svyashchennosluzhitelya v kachestve svidetelya. Materially Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Aktual’nye problem ugolovnogo protsessa i kriminalistiki Rossii i stran SNG” [Some issues arising in connection with the impossibility of questioning a clergyman as a witness. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Actual problems of the criminal process and in Russia and CIS countries”]. Chelyabinsk, 2009. (In Russ.)
56. Tatyanin D.V., Zakirova L. Problemy tayny ispovedi v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii [The problems of the secrecy of confession in the criminal process of Russia]. Vestnik OGU. 2011. No. 3 (122). Pp. 140142. (In Russ.)
57. Tayna ispovedi. Polnyi pravoslavnyi bogoslovskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [The Secret of Confession. A full Orthodox theological encyclopaedic dictionary]. CD-version: Bogoslovskaya entciklopediya, Mocsow, Directmedia Publ., 2005. (In Russ.)
58. Top Anglican calls for lifting seal of confessional in child abuse cases. The Washington Post. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/top-anglican-calls-for-lifting-seal-of-confessional-in-child-abuse-cases/2014/10/23/aeb3fbce-5aec-11e4-9d6c-756a229d8b18_story.html (accessed 21 August 2018)
Review
For citation:
Shibaev D., Uibo N. Legal Mode of the Seal of Confession. Correlation of Secular and Canon Law. Kutafin Law Review. 2018;5(2):444-468. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2018.2.10.444-468
Views: 200
Email this article 