Preview

Kutafin Law Review

Advanced search

DOPING AND HEALTH IN SPORT: CONCEPT AND ESSENCE

https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2017.1.7.040-049

Abstract

The paper investigates the basic approaches to the understanding of doping as a category. The authors clarify the concept of doping based on the proposed criteria. To qualify agents, substances, methods, etc. as doping in the prescribed manner, two criteria are needed and are sufficient: a target criterion (athletic performance improvement) and a social criterion (conflict with the principles and the spirit of sport). Such criteria allow competent authorities and persons (experts) to decide in the prescribed manner whether to include or not a certain agent, substance, etc. into the relevant Restrictive List. A legal criterion (availability of an agent, substance, or method in the list of prohibited ones) is formal. It is crucial for the sports and law enforcement practice but not for the expert one.

About the Authors

A. A. Mokhov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation


V. V. Blazheev
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation


O. A. Shevchenko
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation


References

1. Graevskaya, N. D. and Dolmatova, T. I. (2004). Sports Medicine. Moscow. P. 304. (In Russ.).

2. Karkishchenko, N. N. and Uyba, V. V. (eds.) (2014). Outline of Sports Pharmacology. Vol. 4. St. Petersburg. P. 448. (In Russ.).

3. Kolmogorov, S. V. and Lyapin, S. Kh. (2003). Doping and Its Conceptual Alternative. Arkhangelsk. Pp. 140-151. (In Russ.).

4. Kotskiy, I. V., Voropaev, A. V., Gubin, G. I., Isaev, Yu. S. and Onishchuk, Yu. V. (2008). Medical and Legal Aspects of Doping in Sports. Siberian Medical Journal. No. 1. Pp. 113-115. (In Russ.).

5. Mokhov, A. A. (2004). Medicinal Products as Objects of Civil Rights. Lawyer. No. 12. Pp. 53-57. (In Russ.).

6. Mokhov, A. A. and Filippov, P. M. (2016). Product Life Cycle: Law, Doctrine, Practice. Lawyer. No. 7. Pp. 28-31. (In Russ.).

7. Novikov, V. F. (2009). Problems of the Stimulant Control in Sports. Bulletin of the Kazan State Energy University. No. 3. Pp. 149-157. (In Russ.).

8. Platonov, V. N., Oleynik, S. A. and Gunina, L. M. (2010). Doping in Sports and Problems of Pharmacological Support of Athletes. Moscow. P. 308. (In Russ.).

9. Ponkin, I. and Shevchenko, O. (2014). On development of a legal doctrine in the field of sports. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury. 6. Pp. 32-34. (In Russ.).

10. Portugalov, S. N. (2013). Prospects for the Development of Sports Pharmacology as a Direction of Extreme Medicine. Journal of Sports Science. No. 5. Pp. 87-90. (In Russ.).

11. Rogachev, D. I. (resp. ed.) (2016). Russian Sports Law. Moscow. P. 640. (In Russ.).

12. Solovyev, A. A. and Shevchenko, O. A. (2014). Current Trends in the Legal Regulation of Doping in Sports: Russian and Foreign Experience. Narcology. No. 3. Pp. 3-9. (In Russ.).

13. Federal Law No. 240-FZ dated December 27, 2006 “On Ratification of the International Convention against Doping in Sport” // RF CB. 2007. No. 1 (Part 1). Art. 3.

14. World Anti-Doping Code. International Standard. Restrictive List 2016.


Review

For citations:


Mokhov A.A., Blazheev V.V., Shevchenko O.A. DOPING AND HEALTH IN SPORT: CONCEPT AND ESSENCE. Kutafin Law Review. 2017;4(1):40-49. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2017.1.7.040-049

Views: 346


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-0525 (Print)
ISSN 2713-0533 (Online)