The Impact of the Court of Arbitration for Sport Decisions on the Structuring of Player Contracts
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2025.4.34.829-856
Abstract
This research paper examines the influence of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on the structuring of players’ contracts within professional sports. It highlights how CAS rulings shape contractual norms and practices, impacting both players’ rights and clubs’ responsibilities. The analysis includes a review of landmark cases that have set precedents in contract disputes, illustrating the balance between the player autonomy and the club interests. The findings suggest that CAS decisions promote greater transparency and fairness in contract negotiations, also enforcing compliance with regulatory frameworks. Ultimately, the study underscores the evolving role of CAS in fostering a more equitable sporting environment, influencing contract terms related to transfers, salaries, and dispute resolution. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the legal landscape in sports and its implications for contract management. The research further explores the implications of these rulings on the drafting of contracts, emphasizing the need for clubs to incorporate clearer terms regarding the player conduct, compliance with regulations, and dispute resolution mechanisms. Strategies for mitigating risks associated with contract breaches are also discussed, providing practical insights for clubs and agents. The paper concludes by advocating for an ongoing dialogue between stakeholders to enhance the integrity and effectiveness of contractual agreements in sports. By understanding the impact of CAS decisions, the sports industry can better navigate the complexities of player contracts in an evolving legal landscape.
About the Author
W. Fahmy
Pharos University
Egypt
Egypt
Walid Fahmy, PhD (Public International Law), Professor, Faculty of Legal Studies
References
1. Baddeley, M., (2020). The extraordinary autonomy of sports bodies under Swiss law: lessons to be drawn. The International Sports Law Journal, 20(1–2), pp. 3–17, doi: 10.1007/s40318-019-00163.
2. Bull, W. and Faure, M., (2022). Agents in the sporting feld: a law and economics perspective. The International Sports Law Journal, 22(1), pp. 17–32, doi: 10.1007/s40318-021-00195-x.
3. Chappelet, J.L., (2020). The governance of the Court of Arbitration for Sport. In: Chatziefstathiou, D., García, B., Séguin, B., (2020). Routledge Handbook of the Olympic and Paralympic Games, Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9780429440311-31.
4. Cutting, J., (2003). Deinstitutionalization in major sports leagues: analyzing the NHL’s path to competitive balance and fnancial stability including ideas for implementation. A Research Project, University of Lethbridge.
5. Goh, C.L. and Anderson, J., (2022). The Credibility of the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Journal of Sports and Entertainment. Law, Harvard, 13(2), pp. 233–264.
6. Hebbar, M. and Kelkar, D., (2020). India and the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS). Global Sports Policy Review, 1(2), pp. 164–179.
7. Jameson, L., (2022). Athlete Rights and International Sports Law: A Focus on Contractual Compliance. International Sports Law Review, pp. 101–115.
8. Clausen, J., (2018). The Interrelationship between Professionalisation and Commercialisation in International Sport Federations. PhD thesis, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
9. Kaul, T., (2020). A Guide to FIFA; before and after Electing Court of Arbitration for Sports, 2019–2020, Ct. Uncourt.
10. Khanjari, F.K. and Dadgar, H., (2021). Court of Arbitration for Sport and the Role of National Courts in Resolving International Sports Disputes in the Light of Mutual Reasoning. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 13(1), pp. 58–94.
11. Kurua, L., (2023). The Importance of Arbitration in Sports: Practical and Theoretical Issues. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Law, Vilnius University, Lithuania.
12. Lindholm, J., (2021). A legit supreme court of world sports? The CAS (e) for reform. The International Sports Law Journal, 21(1), pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1007/s40318-021-00184-0.
13. McLaren, R.H., (2022). Sports Agents and the Regulation of Player Representation: Legal and Ethical Perspectives. The International Sports Law Journal, 22(3–4), pp. 201–219.
14. Mitten, M.J. and Hayden, O., (2010). Sports Law: Implications for the Development of International, Comparative, and National Law and Global Dispute Resolution. Tulane Law Review, 85(2), pp. 269–322.
15. Nafziger, J.A.R., (2011). International Sports Law. In: Nafziger, J.A.R. and Gauthier, R., (2011). Handbook on International Sports Law. Elgar.
16. Pelnar, G., (2007). Antitrust Analysis of Sports Leagues. Lexecon.
17. Pust, J., (2021). Sports Jurisdiction and Arbitration. In: Walzel, S., Römisch, S., (2021). Managing Sports Teams: Economics, Strategy and Practice. Springer.
18. Schmoll, R A., (2003). NAFTA Chapter 11 and Professional Sports in Canada. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 36(3), pp. 1027– 1072.
19. Smith, J., (2022). The Role of CAS in Shaping Sports Law: Contractual Integrity and Enforcement. Sports Law Review, 22(1), pp. 45–75.
20. Sroka, R., (2024). Financial fair play and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Journal of Global Sport Management, 9(2), pp. 285–304, doi: 10.1080/24704067.2022.2032258.
21. Wild, A., (2012). CAS and Football: Landmark Cases. Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-90-6704-838-5.
22. Yan, W., (2023). Court of Arbitration for Sport: Rules and Issues. Open Journal of Social Sciences. (11)1, pp. 64–75, doi: 10.4236/jss.2023.111007.
23. Yoost, M.S., (2006). The National Hockey League and Salary Arbitration: Time for a Line Change. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 21(2), pp. 485–538
Review
For citations:
Fahmy W. The Impact of the Court of Arbitration for Sport Decisions on the Structuring of Player Contracts. Kutafin Law Review. 2025;12(4):829-856. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2025.4.34.829-856
Views:
272
JATS XML
Email this article 
