Hybrid Governance Model without Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD): A Constitutional Study on Representation in Nusantara Capital City

E. Saputra; E. Suparman; Z. Muttaqin

doi:10.17803/27130533.2026.2.36.426-451

Hybrid Governance Model without Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD): A Constitutional Study on Representation in Nusantara Capital City

E. Saputra, E. Suparman, Z. Muttaqin

https://doi.org/10.17803/27130533.2026.2.36.426-451

Full Text:

PDF (Eng)

Generate QR code

Abstract

The relocation of the state capital to Nusantara Capital City (IKN) raises concerns about political representation. The IKN Authority, which operates at the ministerial level, performs local government functions without a Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD). This normative legal research analyzes the regulations regarding citizen representation as outlined in Law No. 3 of 2022 and compares these regulations with models from other special regions in Indonesia, as well as the capitals of other countries. The findings indicate that the current institutional design of the IKN is highly centralized under the oversight of the central government, which risks undermining democratic legitimacy. Comparative studies of Canberra and Brussels highlight the necessity for representative mechanisms, both full legislative and semi-legislative, to effectively articulate public aspirations. This study recommends adopting a hybrid model that integrates the supervisory functions of provincial DPRDs or local representative bodies with central authority through structured coordination. This approach aims to establish special regional governance that is adaptive, accountable, and consistent with the principles of constitutional democracy.

Keywords

political representation, special regions, DPRD, IKN Authority, constitution

About the Authors

E. Saputra

Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University
Indonesia

Edi Saputra , Dr. (Law)

Bandung

E. Suparman

Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University
Indonesia

Eman Suparman, Professor

Bandung

Z. Muttaqin

Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University
Indonesia

Zainal Muttaqin , Professor

Bandung

References

1. Ankamah, S.S., (2016). Toward a framework of improving horizontal and social accountability mechanisms: Case studies in Asia. Asian Education and Development Studies, 5(3), pp. 288–304, doi: 10.1108/AEDS-09-2015-0043.

2. Arifin, F., Maarif, I., Bunyamin, B., Bahri, R.A. and Murbani, A.W., (2025). Reforming Indonesia’s Electoral System: Legal and Policy Considerations. Jambe Law Journal, 8(1), pp. 61–99, doi: 10.22437/home.v8i1.501.

3. Askim, J., Klausen, J.E., Vabo, S.I. and Bjurstrøm, K., (2017). Territorial upscaling of local governments: A variable-oriented approach to explaining variance among Western European countries. Local Government Studies, 43(4), pp. 555–576, doi: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1310102.

4. Aspinall, E., Fealy, G. and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) (Singapore), (2003). Local power and politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation & democratisation. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies ISEAS.

5. Chapman, R.J.K., (1990). Australian Public Policy, Federalism, and Intergovernmental Relations: The Federal Factor. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 20(4), pp. 69–84, doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037911.

6. Dixon, R. and Landau, D., (2021). Abusive Constitutional Borrowing. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192893765.003.0005.

7. Dressel, B. and Mietzner, M., (2012). A Tale of Two Courts: The Judicialization of Electoral Politics in Asia. Governance, 25(3), 391–414, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01571.x.

8. Falleti, T.G., (2010). Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511777813.

9. Halmin, M.Y., (2006). The Implementation of Special Autonomy in West Papua, Indonesia: Problems and Recommendations. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235036170_The_Implementation_of_Special_Autonomy_in_West_Papua_Indonesia_Problems_and_Recommendations.

10. Hendry, S., Luhur Prianto, A. and Yuslaini, N., (2023). Political Party Preferences on Local Election in Indonesia: How Does Rational Choice Institutionalism Work in Candidate Selection? Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, Institute for Research and European Studies — Bitola, 9(3), 63–88, doi: 10.47305/JLIA2393063h.

11. Hidayat, A.R., Hospes, O. and Termeer, C.J.A.M., (2025). Why Democratization and Decentralization in Indonesia Have Mixed Results on the Ground: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Administration and Development, 45(2), pp. 159–172, doi: 10.1002/pad.2095.

12. Irsyada, N.E. and Wardana, D.J., (2024). Strengthening of Position The Regional Representative Council (DPD) in the Indonesian Constitutional System. Journal USM Law Review, 7(3), pp. 1690–1704, doi: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10651.

13. Moon, J. and Sharman, C., (2003). Australian Politics and Government: The Commonwealth, the States and the Territories. Cambridge University Press.

14. Kresl, P.K., (1996). Capital Cities // Les capitales / J. Taylor, J.G. Lengellé and C. Andrew, (eds). Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1993, pp. xvi, 418. Suburbs under Siege / Ch.M. Haar. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. xiv, 266. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 29(4), pp. 795–797, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900014578.

15. Kuhlmann, S. and Marienfeldt, J., (2023). Chapter 21: Comparing local government systems and reforms in Europe: from New Public Management to Digital Era Governance? (pp. 313–329). In: Handbook on Local and Regional Governance. Available at: https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781800371200/book-part-9781800371200-33.xml.

16. Minan, A., Arinanto, S. and Djohan, D., (2024). Local Chief Executive Political Accountability In Indonesia: A Historical-Legal Analysis. Constitutional Review, 10(1), pp. 33–66, doi: 10.31078/consrev1012.

17. Mukhlis, M.M., Maskun, M., Tajuddin, M.S., Paidi, Z. bin, and Djalaluddin, M.M., (2025). Challenges and Solutions in the Appointment of Acting Regional Heads (PJ. Kepala Daerah) in Indonesia: A Sharia and Islamic Democracy Perspective. Justicia Islamica, 22(1), pp. 115– 134, doi: 10.21154/justicia.v22i1.10688.

18. Napitupulu, C.A., Dompak, T. and Salsabila, L., (2024). Comparative Analysis of Political Dynamics and Public Policy in Infrastructure Development: A Study of Indonesia and India. Journal of Contemporary Local Politics, 3(1), pp. 15–27, doi: 10.46507/jclp.v3i1.614.

19. Ostwald, K., Tajima, Y. and Samphantharak, K., (2016). Indonesia’s Decentralization Experiment: Motivations, Successes, and Unintended Consequences. Southeast Asian Economies, 33(2), pp. 139–156, https://doi.org/10.1355/ae33-2b.

20. Pitkin, H.F., (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

21. Purnomo, A., Salmawati, S. and Banggu, M., (2025). Political Representation of Indigenous Papuans in the Special Autonomy Era: Case Study of Local Democracy in Southwest Papua. Journal of Contemporary Local Politics, 4(1), pp. 70–80, doi: 10.46507/jclp.v4i1.714.

22. Ria, S.N., Dwiwani, N.Z.O., Naufal, A.F., Gaol, P.L., Putra, M.D. and Susanti, P., (2025). Analisis Yuridis Pengaruh Kedudukan Otorita Ikn Terhadap Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 13(1), pp. 51–60, doi: 10.6679/jzv0av65.

23. Spitzer, H., (2015). Home Rule’ vs. “Dillon’s Rule” for Washington Cities. Seattle University Law Review, 38, 809. State Court Report, (2025). Washington, DC Needs Stronger “Home Rule.” https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/washington-dc-needs-stronger-home-rule.

24. Sumodiningrat, A., Helmi, A. and Rifat, T., (2022). Desain Lembaga Khusus Bidang Legislasi dan Evaluasi Peraturan Perundang-undangan Partisipatif. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3), pp. 380–395, doi: 10.54629/jli.v19i3.879.

25. Sundström, A. and Wängnerud, L., (2016). Corruption as an obstacle to women’s political representation: Evidence from local councils in 18 European countries. Party Politics, 22(3), pp. 354–369, doi: 10.1177/1354068814549339.

26. Suryadinata, L., Arifin, E.N. and Ananta, A., (2003). Indonesia’s Population: Ethnicity and Religion in a Changing Political Landscape. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

27. Talitha, T., Firman, T. and Hudalah, D., (2020). Welcoming two decades of decentralization in Indonesia: A regional development perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(5), pp. 690–708, doi: 10.1080/21622671.2019.1601595.

28. Urbinati, N. and Warren, M.E., (2008). The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, pp. 387–412, doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533.

29. Widnyani, I.A.P.S., Sarikumpul, N.N., Sumada, I.M. and Junaedy, D., (2024). Public Policy in Responding to Challenges the Role of Regional Goverment in Indonesia: A Literature Study. KnE Social Sciences. IAPA 2023 Annual International Conference, pp. 40–54, doi: 10.18502/kss.v9i7.15465.

Review

For citations:

Saputra E., Suparman E., Muttaqin Z. Hybrid Governance Model without Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD): A Constitutional Study on Representation in Nusantara Capital City. Kutafin Law Review. 2026;13(2):426-451. https://doi.org/10.17803/27130533.2026.2.36.426-451

JATS XML