Preview

Kutafin Law Review

Advanced search

Legal Regimes Governing the Use of Prompts (Prompt Engineering) in the Training and Deployment of Large Language Models

https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2026.3.37.585-608

Abstract

The paper examines the legal regimes governing the use of prompts in the training and deployment of large language models (LLMs) and generative artificial intelligence systems (AI systems). It analyzes risks, including prompt injection that may result in unauthorized access to information; intellectual property rights infringements, and AI systems manipulation. The paper further addresses the protection of prompts as objects of intellectual property, including protection under copyright law and trade secret regimes. Particular attention is devoted to jurisprudence in various jurisdictions, including China and the United States, where courts are developing approaches to determining the extent of human creative contribution in works generated with the assistance of AI. The study emphasizes the need for regulatory and technical measures to ensure security, oversight, and the allocation of responsibility in the use of generative AI systems.

About the Author

B. A. Shakhnazarov
Moscow Bar Association
Russian Federation

Beniamin A. Shakhnazarov , Dr. Sci. (Law), Advocate

Moscow



References

1. Ahuja, V., (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Issues and Challenges. ILI Law Review. Winter Issue, pp. 270–285. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372418545_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_AND_COPYRIGHT_ISSUES_AND_CHALLENGES [Accessed 13.07.2026].

2. Aliyev, A., (2026). Legal Perspectives on the Legal Regulation of Ai-Generated Works and Issues on Legal Subjectivity of Artificial Intelligence. Irpin Legal Journal, pp. 155–163, doi: 10.33244/2617-4154-3(20)-2025-155-163.

3. Arnaiz Medina, V., (2024). Intellectual property and prompts: how to protect people who ask machines questions? Available at: https://ponsip.com/en/ip-news/news/intellectual-property-and-prompts-how-to-protect-people-who-ask-machines-questions/ [Accessed 30.12.2025].

4. Burylo, Y., (2022). AI Generated Works and Copyright Protection. Entrepreneurship Economy and Law, 7–13. DOI: 10.32849/2663-5313/2022.3.01. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362257085_AI_GENERATED_WORKS_AND_COPYRIGHT_PROTECTION [Accessed 13.07.2026].

5. Furqan, T., Aleissaee, H.M., Ghenimi, N. et al., (2026). Global laws governing intellectual property rights for AI-generated works. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 6, article No. 449. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44163-026-01165-8#citeas [Accessed 13.07.2026].

6. Gaffar, H. and Albarashdi, S., (2024). Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Works: Exploring Originality and Ownership in a Digital Landscape. Asian Journal of International Law, 15(1), pp. 23–46, doi: 10.1017/S2044251323000735.

7. Geiping, J., Goldblum, M., Goldstein, T., Singla, V. and Somepalli, G., (2023). Understanding and Mitigating Copying in Diffusion Models. arXiv:2305.20086, pp. 47783–47803, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.20086.

8. Jain, V. and Verma, R., (2025). AI and IP: Rethinking Ownership, Creativity and Rights. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(2), doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.42466.

9. Karnouskos, S., (2022). Symbiosis with artificial intelligence via the prism of law, robots, and society. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351562821_Symbiosis_with_artificial_intelligence_via_the_prism_of_law_robots_and_society [Accessed 13.07.2026].

10. Kilovaty, I., (2024). When Manipulating AI Is a Crime. LawFare, 15 May. Available at: https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/when-manipulating-ai-is-a-crime [Accessed 30.12.2025].

11. Lee, J., Le, T., Chen, J. and Lee, D., (2022). Do Language Models Plagiarize? Pre-print. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359254924_Do_Language_Models_Plagiarize [Accessed 13.07.2026].

12. Lee, S., (2025). From Deep Learning to Vertical AI: Opportunities and Risks of Developing AI Solutions in the Intellectual Property Information Service. Academy of Entrepreneurship, 6, pp. 177–196, doi: 10.22815/JES.2025.6.2.177.

13. Lim, N., (2024). Prompting: What to know and does it matter for Intellectual Property? China, Malaysia, USA. Lexology, August. Available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=fa617cdf-641d-4d79-a329-b0a576b0b267 [Accessed 13.07.2026].

14. Murray, M., (2024). Generative AI Art: Copyright Infringement and Fair Use. SMU Science and Technology Law Review. 2024. 26. 259. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377168438_Generative_AI_Art_Copyright_Infringement_and_Fair_Use [Accessed 13.07.2026].

15. Pokrovskaya, A., (2025). AI in Detecting and Preventing IP Infringements. Erasmus Law Review, 17, pp. 60–72. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390850787_AI_in_Detecting_and_Preventing_IP_Infringements [Accessed 13.07.2026].

16. Reissinger, L., Li, Y., Haensch, A.-C. and Sarna, N., (2025). Safer Prompts: Reducing IP Risk in Visual Generative AI. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391492961_Safer_Prompts_Reducing_IP_Risk_in_Visual_Generative_AI [Accessed 13.07.2026].

17. Stephens, H., (2025). Copyright Litigation in China: Some Interesting AI-Related Decisions from Chinese Courts. Available at: https://hughstephensblog.net/tag/li-v-liu/#:~:text=In%20the%20prominent%20Li%20v,through%20a%20series%20of%20prompts [Accessed 31.01.2025].

18. Sutton, M. and Ruck, D., (2024). Indirect Prompt Injection: Generative AI’s Greatest Security Flaw Expert Analysis. Available at: https://cetas.turing.ac.uk/publications/indirect-prompt-injection-generative-ais-greatest-security-flaw [Accessed 28.12.2025].

19. Vyas, N., Kakade, S. and Barak, B., (2023). Provable Copyright Protection for Generative Models. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368688377_Provable_Copyright_Protection_for_Generative_Models [Accessed 13.07.2026].


Review

For citations:


Shakhnazarov B.A. Legal Regimes Governing the Use of Prompts (Prompt Engineering) in the Training and Deployment of Large Language Models. Kutafin Law Review. 2026;13(3):585-608. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2026.3.37.585-608

Views: 2

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-0525 (Print)
ISSN 2713-0533 (Online)