Administrative Law Forms and Methods of Corruption Prevention in Public Administration in the Mechanism of Ensuring Protection of the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2022.4.22.664-683
Abstract
The study is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the content and features of the currently existing administrative law forms and methods used to prevent corruption in public administration of the Russian Federation. The authors draw attention to the high level of public danger of corruption and its manifestations. It is emphasized that corruption is one of the main threats to Russia’s national security. The paper describes the main universal legal and doctrinal approaches to corruption prevention and corruption manifestations in public administration bodies at federal, regional and municipal levels of government. The authors have revealed the main causes of corruption in public administration; their detailed classification is given. The paper also considers the main directions of the state anti-corruption policy of the Russian Federation in public administration bodies. Attention is focused on the participation of civil society institutions in the implementation of certain areas of anti-corruption. The paper presents the authors’ proposals for improving legal foundations of the currently existing domestic system of anti-corruption forms and methods aimed at preventing and minimizing corruption manifestations. The paper analyzes types, content, and features of their application in public administration activities.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. A. AntonyanRussian Federation
Elena A. Antonyan, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of Criminology and Penal Law,
9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya ulitsa, Moscow 125993
Yu. I. Migachev
Russian Federation
Yuriy I. Migachev, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Administrative Law and Procedure,
9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya ulitsa, Moscow 125993
M. M. Polyakov
Russian Federation
Maksim M. Polyakov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Administrative Law and Procedure,
9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya ulitsa, Moscow 125993
References
1. Artemyev, A.B., (2015). Corruption in the mechanism of the functioning of the state: a theoretical and legal study within the framework of an evolutionary approach. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow. (In Russ.).
2. Dorokhov, N.I., (2006). Some aspects of corruption assessment as a socio-legal phenomenon. Voennyj juridicheskij zhurnal [Military Law Journal], 4, pp. 26–29. (In Russ.).
3. Kurakin, A.V., (2008). Administrative and legal means of preventing corruption in the public service system of the Russian Federation. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Lyubertsy. (In Russ.).
4. Rose-Ackerman, S., (2010). Corruption and the State. Causes, consequences, reforms. Tr. from English by O.A. Alyakrinsky. 2nd ed. Moscow: Logos Publ. (In Russ.).
5. Sevryugin, K.V., (2011). Anti-corruption in the system of the state civil service of the Russian Federation: administrative law research. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Tyumen. (In Russ.).
6. Shevelevich, A.A., (2008). Administrative law foundation of combating corruption in the public service system. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow. (In Russ.).
7. Shishkarev, S.N., (2010). Legal order in the field of anticorruption: theoretical and legal research. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow. (In Russ.).
8. Talvitie, A., (2017). Observed Differences in Corruption between Asia and Africa: The Industrial Organization of Corruption and Its Cure. Transportation Research Procedia, Volume 25, pp. 4472–4490, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.357.
9. Umanskaya, V.P., (2014). System of Legal Acts of Executive Authorities: Theoretical and Applied Aspects. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Russian Law Academy of the Ministry of Justice of the RF. Moscow. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Antonyan E.A., Migachev Yu.I., Polyakov M.M. Administrative Law Forms and Methods of Corruption Prevention in Public Administration in the Mechanism of Ensuring Protection of the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens of the Russian Federation. Kutafin Law Review. 2022;9(4):664-683. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2022.4.22.664-683