The Communicative Function of Law in a Digital State
https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.2.25.495-514
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the analysis of the communicative law function, which is the basis of the modern interaction between social state and civil society in the era of the digital law formation. In the context of modern digital society and state, we need to take into account the specificity of understanding and classification of the law functions. Communication is one of the most important characteristics of modern digital state and law. In this regard, the paper considers the communicative law function both socially and legally. Socially, the communicative function is considered as an informational one. In this regard, it is essential for the legal culture, legal education and legal consciousness. Communicative function as a social one involves understanding of the interaction between society and law from a position of the linguistic para digm. With this concept, the legal system is seen as a system of communication between subjects based on the autonomy of the individual. In the modern digital state communication as a social function of law is a basis of legitimization of legal acts. The legal consciousness is an important condition for law recognition. Along with the social function, communication plays an important role as a legal one. In this aspect, communicative action is connected to the regulatory and the protective functions of law. Communication plays a key role in the modern legal regulation due to the extension of its subject. The functioning of law in modernity has its own specifics with regard to the process of society juridification under conditions of law modernization and fulfilment of the state social function. The juridification consists in the fact that legal norms replace other social rules. Regulation of the majority of social relations through legal functions leads to the need to take into account communicative connections in society. Legal functions of law in the modern society should use the principle of deliberation in law to achieve their goals. Communication in its functional aspect is deemed a necessary foundation of an effective legal regulation and legal policy.
About the Author
V. V. Denisenko
MGIMO University; Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Public
Law, Odintsovo Branch of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Associate Professor of International Law Department, Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
3, Novo-Sportivnaya St., Odintsovo 143007
References
1. Alexy, R., (2011). Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung [A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification]. Suhrkamp . (In Germ.).
2. Austin, J.L., (1986). How to Do Things with Words. New in Foreign Linguistics. Theory of Speech Acts, 17, pp. 26–27.
3. Bagmet, A.M., (2020). Restorative Justice and Mediation in Relation to Minors: Educational and Methodological Manual. Moscow: Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.).
4. Baudrillard, J., (1981). Simulacra and Simulation. Paris: Galilée. Belyaev, M.A., (2016). Model of Development of Law: from “Evolution” to “Explosion.” Proceedings of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, 3, pp. 9–20. (In Russ.).
5. Bergel, J.-L., (2000). The General Theory of Law. Moscow: Nota Bene Publ. (In Russ.).
6. Chervyakovsky, A.V., (2007). The Information Function of Law. Omsk: Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. (In Russ.).
7. Denisenko, V.V., (2008). Juridification of Society and Concepts of Legal Regulation. Proceedings of Voronezh State University, Series: Law, 2 (5), pp. 56–62.
8. Denisenko, V.V., (2020). Aleatory Democracy and the Problem of Simulacra in the Legal System. In: Bochkaryov, S.V. (ed.). Legal Forms of Experiencing History: Practices and Limits. St. Petersburg: Asterion Publ. Pp. 301–310. (In Russ.).
9. Dewey, J., (1954). The Public and its Problems. Chicago.
10. Foucault, M., (2005). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.).
11. Gadamer, H.-G., (1988). Truth and Method. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.).
12. Habermas, J., (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: MIT Press. Habermas, J., (1997). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Frankfurt.
13. Kymlicka, W., (2010). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Moscow: Publ. House of the State University — Higher School of Economics. (In Russ.).
14. Lazarev, V.V., (2015). Legal Science: Continuation of the Discussion. Lex Russica, 11, pp. 10–24. (In Russ.).
15. Luhmann, N., (1969). Legitimation durch Verfahren [Legitimation by Procedure]. Neuwied: Luchterhand.
16. Luhmann, N., (1985). A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routlege&Kegan Paul.
17. Lyotard, J.-F., (1998). The Postmodern Condition. St. Petersburg: Alethea Publ. (In Russ.).
18. Malinovsky, A.A., Osina, D.M., and Trikoz, E.N., (2021). State Support for the Russian Economy Affected by Covid-19 Consequences (Legal Aspects). Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 139, pp. 283– 287.
19. Maltsev, G.V., (2007). Social Foundations of Law. Moscow: Norma Publ. (In Russ.).
20. Parfenov, A.A., (2019). On Legal Communicative Competence. Law and Politics, 2, pp. 1–18. (In Russ.).
21. Pigolkin, A.S., (2000). Legislative Technique. Moscow: Norma Publ. (In Russ.).
22. Polyakov, A.V., (2011). Normativity of Legal Communication. Pravovedenie, 5, pp. 27–45. (In Russ.).
23. Radko, T.N., (2014). The Theory of Law Functions. Moscow: Prospect Publ. (In Russ.).
24. Searle, J.R., (1969). Actos de habla: Ensayo de filosofía del lenguaje [Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language]. Cambridge Univ. Press.
25. Van Hoecke, M., (2012). Law as Communication. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg St. Univ. Publ. House, Univ. Publ. Consortium. (In Russ.).
26. Varlamova, N.V., (2009). Efficiency of Legal Regulation: Rethinking the Concept. Pravovedenie, 1, pp. 212–232. (In Russ.).
27. Vedeneev, Y.A., (2014). The Legal Picture of the World: between the Proper and the Existent. Lex Russica, 6, pp. 641–654. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Denisenko V.V. The Communicative Function of Law in a Digital State. Kutafin Law Review. 2023;10(3):495-514. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.2.25.495-514
Views:
327
Email this article 
