The FIFA 2022 World Cup and Labour Rights - Seizing the Moment for Labour Law Reforms in Qatar
https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2018.1.9.139-164
Abstract
The award of the 2022 World Cup football to Qatar is highly controversial because of the human and labour rights infringements due to the Kafala-system. The argument in this contribution is though that it has also brought something good, namely it created the momentum for change, in particular, to abolish the Kafala-system. It is difficult to enforce such change through judicial review, as is illustrated by the case FNV c.s. vs FIFA. Soft law procedures, on the other hand, which are based on dialogue, trust and commitment are able to set changes in motions, which is illustrated by the Art. 26 complaint initiated by twelve delegates of the ILO against Qatar and the Specific Instance with the Swiss NCP initiated by BWI against FIFA. This contribution describes the consequences of the Kafala-system, explains why FIFA also fulfils a role in this, even though it concerns the law of the sovereign State Qatar, describes three cases addressing the poor circumstances of the migrant workers in Qatar, and concludes that for these kind of situations soft law proactive processes may be more effective than hard law retrospective judicial review.
References
1. Bahrain Moves to Reform Kafala, Exclusions Remain. Americans for Democracy. Oct. 28. 2016.
2. Conn, D. (2017). Thousands of Qatar World Cup workers “subjected to life-threatening heath”. The Guardian. Sept. 17.
3. Erfani, A. (2015). Kicking Away Responsibility: FIFA’s Role in Response to Migrant Worker Abuses in Qatar’s 2022 World Cup. Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal. 22 (2). 623.
4. Fairbrother, P., Hennebert, M.-A., and Lévesque, C. (eds.) (2013). Transnational Trade Unionism. Building Union Power. London: Routledge.
5. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., and Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy. 12:1. 78.
6. Grell, T. (2017). FIFA’s Responsibility for Human Rights Abuses in Qatar. Part I: The Claims against FIFA. Asser International Sports Law Blog. Feb. 28.
7. Grell, T. (2017). FIFA’s Responsibility for Human Rights Abuses in Qatar. Part II: The Zurich Court’s Ruling. Asser International Sports Law Blog. March 6.
8. Harmassi, M. (2009). Bahrain to end “slavery” system. BBC Arabic Service Radio. May 6.
9. ITUC. Qatar Arrests 100 Striking Workers for Deportation. Nov. 26, 2014.
10. ITUC. The case against Qatar. Host of the FIFA 2022 World Cup. Special Report. March 2014.
11. Laughland, O. (2017). FIFA official took bribes to back Qatar’s 2022 World Cup bid, court hears. The Guardian. Nov. 15.
12. Liew, J. (2017). World Cup 2022: Qatar’s workers are not workers, they are slaves, and they are building mausoleums, not stadiums. The Independent. Oct. 3.
13. Müller, T., Platzer, H.-W., and Rüb, S. (2010). Global Union Federations and the Challenges of Globalisation. International Policy Analysis.
14. ter Haar, B. Ph. and Keune, M. (2014). One step forward or more window-dressing? A legal analysis of the recent CSR initiatives in the garment industry in Bangladesh. The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law & Industrial Relations. 30:1. 5.
15. The Middle East’s migrant workers. Forget about rights. The Economist. August 10. 2013.
16. Toumi, H. (2011). Calls to implement summer working hours in Qatar. Gulf News. May 15.
Review
For citations:
Ter Haar B.P. The FIFA 2022 World Cup and Labour Rights - Seizing the Moment for Labour Law Reforms in Qatar. Kutafin Law Review. 2018;5(1):139-164. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2018.1.9.139-164
Views:
1070
Email this article 
