Preview

Kutafin Law Review

Advanced search

Concepts of Public Law Dogmatics during European Law Emergence.

https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2025.4.34.908-927

Abstract

The article is devoted to the impact of the idealistic concepts of the Antiquity made on the development of concepts of public law dogmatics during European law emergence. The current research is topical both for science (it helps to understand the conceptual framework as well as the way of thinking of those who specialize in public law) and application: the perception of the ideological grounds of public law dogma not only strengthens the relevant institutes of law regulating the public authority, but can also consolidate the legal community as the bearer of a relatively autonomous professional tradition important for the society. As in the early stages of its development dogmatics was mostly private law, the structure of public law in many ways was made of civil constructs and concepts. A new public law identity was shaped only at the end of the 19th century and the fundamental public law borrowings could be avoidable. The article attempts to find out the way the idealistic methodology influences the perception of public law pioneers of the main elements of legal reality, considering the dichotomy of idealistic and material, private and public, positive and natural law. Special attention is paid to the interpretation of the concept of “State” by J. Bluntschli, K. Gerber, O. Gierke and various conceptual approaches to the State (as a mechanism, system, legal entity, construct, etc.) in the theory of public law and order. It is noted that as compared to the representatives of a later developed legal positivism German lawyers trace down “ethical and spiritual contents” of law. The final part of the article is dedicated to the interpretation of legal dogmas as viewed in objective idealism. To solve the tasks set in the article, historical and legal, logical, hermeneutical, dialectical, formal and legal, sociological, theoretical and predictive as well as other methods of cognition are used.

About the Author

P. L. Likhter
Penza State University
Russian Federation

Pavel L. Likhter, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Private and Public Law



References

1. Aristotle, (1983). Politics. Works in 4 volumes. Asmus, V.F., Mikeladze, Z.N., Rozhansky, I.D., Dovatur, A.I. (eds). Moscow: Thought, vol. 4, pp. 375–545. (In Russ.).

2. Auɣarth, A., (1883). Die platonische Ideenlehre. Inaugural Dissertation. Marburg. (In German).

3. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T., (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. L.: Penguin Books. Bluntschli, J.C., (1868). Allgemeines Staatsrecht. Ertser Band. 4. AuÀ. München: J.G. Cotta-Buchhandlung. (In German).

4. Cohen, H., (1902). System der Philosophie. T. 1: Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. Berlin. (In German).

5. Gerber, C.F., (1880). Grundzüge des deutschen Staatsrechts [1865]. Dritte AuÀ. Leipzig: Verlag von Bernhard Tauchnitz. (In German).

6. Gerber, C.F., (1852). Über öɣentliche Rechte. Tübingen: Laupp und Siebeck. (In German).

7. Gierke, O., (1874). Die Grundbegriɣe des Staatsrechts. Tübingen: Laupp. (In German).

8. Gierke, O., (1895). Deutsches Privatrecht. Erster Band, Allgemeiner Teil und Personenrecht. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot. (In German).

9. Hart, H.L.A., (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

10. Hegel, G.W.F., (1812). Wissenschaft der Logik. Bd. 1,1. Nürnberg: Schrag. (In German).

11. Hegel, G.W.F., (1990). Philosophy of Law. Moscow: Thought. (In Russ.).

12. Heidegger, M., (2001). Gesamtausgabe (herausgegeben von H. Tie tjen). II. Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1919–1944. Band 36/37. Sein und Wah rheit. 1. Die Grundfrage der Philosophie. 2. Vom Wesen der Wahrheit. Frankfurt, Moscow: Klostermann. (In German).

13. Hertwig, O., (1922). Der Staat als Organismus: Gedanken zur Entwicklung der Menschheit. Jena: G. Fischer. (In German).

14. Kelsen, H., (1934). Pure Theory of Law. Translated by Knight. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

15. Muromtsev, S.A., (1884). Chto takoe dogma prava? Kritiko polemicheskaya zametka po povodu stat’i Gol’mstena “Neskol’ko myslej o pozitivizme v nauke prava” [What Is a Dogma of Law? A Critical Polemic Note on Holmsten’s Article “A Few Thoughts on Positivism in the Science of Law”]. Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. Legal Bulletin, issue 4, pp. 759–765; issue 5, pp. 231–240. (In Russ.).

16. Plato, (1993). Parmenides. Collected works in 4 volumes. Los eva, A.F., Asmus, V.F., Takho-Godi, A.A. (eds). Moscow: Mysl Publ. Vol. 2, pp. 346–412. (In Russ.).

17. Plato, (1994). Republic. Collected works in 4 volumes. Loseva, A.F., Asmus, V.F., Takho-Godi, A.A. (eds). Moscow: Mysl Publ. Vol. 3, pp. 79– 421. (In Russ.).

18. Savigny, F.C., (1840). Vom Beruf unsrer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. Available at: https://www.gleichsatz.de/b-u-t/can/rec/savigny_beruf.html [Accessed 01.02.2025]. (In German).

19. Spectorsky, E.V., (2006). The problem of social physics in the 17th century. Vol. II. St. Petersburg: Science. (In Russ.).

20. Stahl, Fr.J., (1845). Das monarchische Princip. Heidelberg: Mohr. (In German).

21. Stammler, R., (1928). Lehrbuch der Rechtsphilosophie. de Gruyter, Berlin 1970. Verm. AuÀage. Unveränderter photomechanischer Nach druck: de Gruyter, Berlin, Leipzig. (In German).

22. Stolleis, M., (2014). Die Entstehung des Allgemeinen Teils des Verwaltungsrechts (1850–1900). Juridica International, 21, pp. 21–28. (In German).

23. Windelband, W., (1901). Platon. 3. AuÀ. Stuttgart: Frommanns Verlag. (In German).


Review

For citations:


Likhter P.L. Concepts of Public Law Dogmatics during European Law Emergence. Kutafin Law Review. 2025;12(4):908-927. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2025.4.34.908-927

Views: 131

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-0525 (Print)
ISSN 2713-0533 (Online)